+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

Ya'alon is only the latest Israeli security official to back Iran deal

In declaring that there are no existential threats to Israel, the former defense minister joins a litany of current and former security officials who have spoken out in favor of the Iran nuclear deal.

By Ali Gharib

Moshe Ya’alon announces his resignation as Israel’s defense minister at IDF headquarters in Tel Aviv, May 20, 2016. (Miriam Alster/Flash90)

Moshe Ya’alon announces his resignation as Israel’s defense minister at IDF headquarters in Tel Aviv, May 20, 2016. (Miriam Alster/Flash90)

When world powers led by the United States signed a nuclear deal with Iran, American neoconservatives and other pro-Israel hawks were positively apoplectic. Mark Kirk, the Republican senator from Illinois who enjoys a consistent windfall of pro-Israel campaign cash, said that the deal was worse than the Munich agreement with Nazi Germany. The Wall Street Journal opinion page’s Bret Stephens actually used that as a headline: “Worse than Munich.”

In fairness, these hawks were just taking their cues from Israel itself. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has long regarded Iran as a second coming of the Nazis. He stated this unequivocally when the world was on the cusp of a nuclear deal—and defended the line of argument when it was criticized. That this notion would echo through rank-and-file right-wing Israel supporters in America should be no surprise: they have long been clear in their affinity for Netanyahu and his bankrupt worldview.

Oddly, however, Netanyahu’s tack seems to have always engendered more detractors in Israel itself — and not just lily-livered peaceniks. One hawkish figure, Netanyahu’s last defense minister Moshe Ya’alon, didn’t ever directly repudiate the comparisons of Iran to the Nazis but never made them himself. An eight-year member of Netanyahu’s Likud party, Ya’alon recently parted ways acrimoniously with the government. At a speech to this year’s Herzliya Conference (the “neocon Woodstock“), he delivered a blistering attack on Netanyahu and his rhetoric. Here’s The Washington Post‘s translation:

At this time and in the foreseeable future, there is not an existential threat to Israel. Israel is the strongest state in the region and there is an enormous gap between it and every country and organization around it. Therefore, it is appropriate for the leadership in Israel to stop scaring the citizens and to stop telling them that we are on the verge of a second Holocaust.

But Ya’alon didn’t stop there. He went on to more-or-less endorse the Iran nuclear deal. The Islamic Republic’s nuclear program, said Ya’alon, “has been frozen in light of the deal signed by the world powers and does not constitute an immediate, existential threat for Israel.” It’s hard to see how this latest statement could possibly stand in opposition to Secretary of State John Kerry’s defense that “the people of Israel will be safer with this deal.”

Ya’alon’s turn-around has been nothing short of stunning. Though eschewing comparisons to the Nazis, he was a vociferous critic of diplomacy with Iran. As Netanyahu pointed out in his rebuttal to Ya’alon, the then-defense minister called Iran an “existential threat” to Israel just four months ago. “One cannot express full confidence in the leadership when one is part of it and then say the complete opposite when you are outside,” Netanyahu said in response to Ya’alon’s latest remarks, according to the Post. “Therefore, no importance should be ascribed to such political attacks.”

But actually one can expect exactly that. When one is in government, one is responsible to higher authorities. A government official must toe the line — it is literally part of their job — or resign and speak out. In this case, Ya’alon followed orders until his relationship with the government ended. Only then did he give voice to his criticisms. Ya’alon’s announcement that he had his own political ambitions was an additional complication — see: the “political attacks” that Netanyahu referred to — but it does not obviate what he is saying.

After all, Ya’alon is not merely casting himself as an outsider of Israeli politics. Rather, he is joining a litany of current and former security officials who have spoken out in favor of the Iran nuclear deal. Dissent from Netanyahu’s anti-Iran belligerence can be found at the top echelons of the military and among other nodes of the security establishment. The list is not limited to individuals, either. Israel’s nuclear commission, a bureaucratic body of experts created to advise the government, has also endorsed the deal. And yet in the U.S., hawks ignore the mounting accumulation of these countervailing opinions.

It’s a remarkable show of intellectual dishonesty. Some neocons bristle at being called Likudniks — they think it smacks of dual-loyalty accusations — but until now it seemed apt. With even a Likud man like Ya’alon breaking with Netanyahu’s party, however, it might be said that, today, neocons are hardly even Likudniks; they’re pure Netanyahuists. There is nothing that can make them so much as even acknowledge criticisms of the Israeli prime minister, let alone accept those criticisms. They are showing, once again, that their neoconservative ideology is just as bankrupt as their idol Netanyahu.

Ali Gharib is a New York-based journalist on U.S. foreign policy with a focus on the Middle East and Central Asia. This article was first published on Lobelog.com. It is reproduced here with permission.

Newsletter banner

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article

    * Required


    1. i_like_ike52

      Ya’alon is the latest in a series of arrogant. failed “generals/politicians” who think they have some sort of right they were born with to rule the country without any sort of recourse to respect for the democratic process and public opinion.It is no surprise that the three worst Prime Ministers in history were the three generals….Rabin, Barak and Sharon…all of whom gave Israel the world periods of terrorism in its history and whose main contributions to dealing with it was to say “there is nothing that can be done about it”..
      Ya’alon was chosen for the highest positions in the Israel government and was voted to high positions on the Likud Knesset list by the Likud membership. Out of gratitude he now curses Netanyahu and the party for being “extremists” even though this didn’t seem to bother him for the past several years. He even tried to align himself with Feiglin’s faction which Netanyahu succeeded in ousting from the party because he and many others viewed THEM as too extreme. Thus anything Ya’alon says should be taken with a grain of salt. I hope he does like Douglas MacArthur said about old soldiers and simply “fade away”.

      Click here to Reply or Forward

      Reply to Comment
      • Ben

        Yes indeed Ya’alon is the latest in a series of arrogant, failed “generals/politicians” who think they have some sort of right they were born with to rule the country without any sort of recourse to respect for the democratic process and public opinion. Indeed. The whole enterprise is corrupt. Read the article by Ali Gharib on this same page. You think you just had a string of bad luck? No way. No silk purse from this sow’s ear. You make the left’s case for it. Time to make this an actual democratic process. That means either enfranchising the entire population from river to sea or letting go of a mere 22% of historical Palestine and East Jerusalem with it. Decisions decisions. And then you won’t have these mysterious serial failures. You will have to surrender the idea that only Jewish people matter but you’ll get over it, trust me.

        Reply to Comment
        • i_like_ike52

          You think I believe “only the Jewish people matter”? Well, you only believe the “Palestinian people matter” and you really don’t even care about their lives, either, for that matter. I have pointed out on several occasions why the 2-state solution can’t work and why a singe, unitary state can’t work either and that the only soluation is a Palestinian-Jordanian-Israeli confederation (which exists to some extent at the present time) and that the main ones who would suffer for the two “solutions” you keep demanding will be the Palestinians themselves, just as their Arab/Muslim brothers are persecuting and slaughtering each other in the neighboring states. But you ignore it. “Just give them a state” you demand without and regard for the consequences, which would be a bloody civil war in the Palestinian territories which would spill over into Israel.
          We are not going to commit suicide in order to make you “feel good about yourself”.
          And, by the way, as a “humanity-loving progressive” what are you PERSONALLY doing to help the Syrians and Iraqis who have had sever HUNDRED THOUSAND PEOPLE killed and million uprooted?

          Reply to Comment
          • Ben

            The occupation can’t be neutered by not so clever gimmicks, nor would Jordan or Egypt ever agree to it. Yes you laid out a scenario, a scenario for total Israeli domination and deepening occupation. Nothing more, nothing less. The same corrosive trends would continue. It is nice how, after 50 years of effectively entrenching an occupation, effectively dividing and conquering, and effectively promoting weakness and corruption with every ruthless trick in the book, right wing Israelis then throw up their hands and bat their eyes and feign damsel-in-distress helplessness: “Oh!, why I just don’t know how we could ever promote cooperation and stability and strength politically and economically in our neighbor, why darling I think I’m going to swoon and faint at the mere thought of it! We are so helpless! Victims of the big bad Palestinian wolf! Rescue me! Oh my! Why, dear old Uncle Sam is only giving me an allowance of 40 billion over 10 years! What’s a sweet little lady like me to do?!”

            Reply to Comment