+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

Will we ever know the truth about World Vision and Hamas?

Australia says it found no evidence that its World Vision funds were diverted to Hamas, as Israel alleges. But can the Israeli legal process be trusted?

File photo of Palestinian workers offloading a truck full of aid in the Gaza Strip. (Abed Rahim Khatib/Flash90)

File photo of workers offloading a truck full of aid in the Gaza Strip. (Abed Rahim Khatib/Flash90)

The Australian foreign ministry has not found any evidence that the Gaza head of a major humanitarian organization funneled Australian funds to Hamas, Australia’s ABC news reported Wednesday. The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) conducted an investigation after Israel arrested a, Muhammed el-Halabi, the Palestinian head of World Vision’s Gaza office, and accused him of siphoning millions designated for humanitarian relief in Gaza to Hamas.

Israeli authorities held el-Halabi for 50 days before lifting a gag order on the fact that he had even been arrested, during which time Israel says he made a confession. For 25 of those days he was not allowed to see his lawyer, according to early reports. His lawyer has said he was physically beaten, and according to the ABC report, he was held in solitary confinement for six days – a practice that is associated with torture. Halabi has maintained his innocence and pled not guilty, refusing to accept a plea bargain sought by prosecutors.

World Vision is conducting its own internal forensic investigation into the issue, and has stated that it conducts scrupulous yearly audits to detect and prevent exactly this type of fraud. Australia and Germany both suspended their funding to date, for World Vision’s Gaza program in light of the arrest. The organization’s program mainly serves over 90,000 Palestinian children, Palestinians, including 40,000 in Gaza alone, according to its website.

Halabi’s case is currently being heard in Israel’s Beersheva District Court, which generally hears cases related to Gaza. A spokesperson for the Israeli Foreign Ministry, Emanuel Nahshon, told +972 Magazine that Israeli authorities had no comment on the DFAT report, arguing that the trial is not specifically about Australian funds but World Vision’s Gaza funding in general. The Shin Bet, Israel’s domestic intelligence agency whose jurisdiction also extends to the West Bank and Gaza, doesn’t focus on NGOs, Nahshon said. “We only got to them through Halabi, because he works with Hamas,” he added, repeating the accusations against the Gazan man. “We have no focus on international non-governmental organizations.”

World Vision did not respond to a request for comment by the time of publication.

Israel has made similar accusations that relate to two other humanitarian organizations over the past year. In August 2016 Israel accused a United Nations Development Program (UNDP) employee, Waheed al-Bursh, of aiding Hamas. Israeli authorities also arrested and held Bursh for over a month, also under a gag order and barring contact with the outside world, including with a lawyer. He eventually accepted a plea deal after after the Shin Bet said the he had confessed, according to news reports. A seven-month prison sentence for aiding an illegal organization “without intention” was reduced to time served and eight months of probation. Bursh’s case also raised the specter of a diplomatic incident, +972 Magazine reported at the time, because as a United Nations employee, the UN asserted that he enjoyed limited immunity that only the secretary-general could lift.

In the third case, which broke just days ago, Israel arrested a Palestinian Gaza resident who works for a Turkish humanitarian organization, Tika, on similar charges: diverting aid to Hamas for armed attacks on Israel.

“We feel there’s an impression of a modus operandi of exploiting international organizations intended to help regular people, but to get their funds and material to Hamas,” said Nahshon.

Israel’s accusations regarding World Vision can be seen in the context of a broad campaign against civil society organizations in recent years, especially those organizations dealing with human rights in the occupied Palestinian territories. Last year, the Israeli Knesset passed the so-called NGO law to constrain civil society organizations, tailored to almost exclusively target left-leaning groups or those defending human rights violations against Palestinians.

Earlier this week another law passed its final reading, this one tailored to restrict funding for civil society groups promoting political opposition. These laws followed years of intense rhetorical attacks on left-wing civil society organizations in the public sphere. The accelerated pace of accusations against international NGOs addressing Palestinian humanitarian may be an extension of intimidation of civil society – this time in the international sphere.

Israeli authorities have also been quick to publicize allegations against individual Palestinians and Palestinian society for acts of violence and terrorism in recent months, later found to be unproven or wrong. In a wave of 1,500 wildfires late last year, the Israeli prime minister and other senior government officials spoke freely of an “arson intifada.” No one was ever charged and no evidence of Arab arson-terrorism was ever produced.

In January, Israeli police killed a Bedouin citizen of Israel who had run over and killed a policeman with his jeep during a pre-dawn operation to raze the town of Umm al-Hiran. Official statements from police and senior government ministers immediately branded the man, a schoolteacher, as a terrorist and alleged ISIS ties, based on newspaper headlines they found in his home. Later investigations indicated that police shot at him mistakenly, causing him to accelerate and lose control of his vehicle, only then striking other officers. A government minister gave a “qualified apology,” for the death, but not for the unfounded accusations.

Which context, or narrative, the World Vision case ultimately falls into will not be clear until the trial has concluded. But even then, it seems unlikely either side will be convinced.

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article

    * Required


    1. Baladi Akka 1948

      Emmanuel Nahshon is a pathetic liar, he’s regularly interviewed on France24 in French, and always lying out through his mouth. How could anyone pay attention to his BH.

      Reply to Comment
    2. R5

      The Israeli legal system is highly respected in developed countries, and Israeli judges, legal schools and practicing lawyers are much more influential in global legal scholarship and opinion than Israel’s size should suggest. But +972 is happy to undermine confidence in the courts – which are an indispensable pillar of public order in any functioning democracy – in the service of suicidal, far-left politics and crackpot theories. Repugnant, shameful nonsense. And the author’s bad faith is revealed by her references to the behavior of the Israeli politicians and police, which is clearly an attempt to conflate different issues and influence the reader emotionally, not rationally.

      Reply to Comment
      • Bruce Gould


        Although settlers in the Occupied Territories live in an area that is subject to military rule, and despite the fact that the settlements have not been formally annexed, Israel has applied a substantial part of Israeli law to the settlers. As a result, Israeli civilians living in the Occupied Territories are not subject to military or local law, as are the Palestinians, but are prosecuted according to the Israeli penal law……The Emergency Regulations (Offenses in the Occupied Territories – Jurisdiction and Legal Assistance), 5727-1967, enacted by the Minister of Defense in July 1967, provided that Israeli civilians who have committed offenses in the Occupied Territories can be tried also in Israeli civil courts. This created extra-territorial personal status for Israeli civilians in the Occupied Territories. Since then, the Knesset has regularly extended these regulations….Being subject to the Israeli judicial system, settlers enjoy liberties and legal guarantees that are denied Palestinian defendants in the Occupied Territories charged with the same offense.

        Reply to Comment