+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

Will the UN Gaza report finally push Europe to confront Israel?

The UN’s Commission of Inquiry report on the 2014 Gaza war has been able to achieve what the Goldstone report could not in 2009: a new gateway for confronting the EU to demand accountability for the devastation of the war.

Palestinians inspect damage to a destroyed ambulance in Shujaiyeh, a neighborhood in eastern Gaza City that was the site of some of the war’s heaviest fighting, July 27, 2014. (Photo by Anne Paq/Activestills.org)

Palestinians inspect damage to a destroyed ambulance in Shujaiyeh, a neighborhood in eastern Gaza City that was the site of some of the war’s heaviest fighting, July 27, 2014. (Photo by Anne Paq/Activestills.org)

Two weeks ago the UN Human Rights Council passed a resolution to adopt the report of the UN Commission of Inquiry (COI) on the 2014 Gaza Conflict, calling for the implementation of the report’s recommendations. In a move that some observers described as “unprecedented,” all eight EU member states on the Council – the U.K., France, Germany, the Netherlands, Ireland, Estonia, Latvia and Portugal – voted as a unified bloc in favor of the resolution.

The EU vote was surprising given its track record under “Item 7” of the council’s agenda, which examines the human rights situation in the occupied territories. Many EU states criticized the UN fact-finding mission led by Justice Richard Goldstone that investigated Operation Cast Lead in 2009, claiming the mission was counterproductive to the peace process. Last year, the EU members on the council abstained from the resolution that created the new COI for Operation Protective Edge, saying the text was biased and “prejudged” the circumstances of the war.

This reluctant and oftentimes obstructive approach by the EU in the council was further reflected in its discussions ahead of this month’s vote, when it applied strong pressure on the Palestinian delegation to tone down the language of its resolution. Reports also emerged that the EU members were actually told by the Israeli government to vote for the resolution, as long as they forced the text to be vague enough to be almost negligible – possibly to help Israel avoid dealing with UN follow-up mechanisms like they did with Goldstone.

The focus on the resolution’s text, however, misses what is arguably a more important outcome: by approving the resolution, the EU has, whether intentionally or not, granted much-needed political legitimacy to the COI report. Most of the members on the Human Rights Council are states with terrible human rights records and that give a disproportionate amount of attention to Israel, with little impact on Israeli decision-makers or facts on the ground. The EU states hardly have clean human rights records themselves; but having them join the wider international community in taking a collective stance on this subject is politically significant for forcing Israel to start facing the serious issues raised by the COI, regardless of the dubious backgrounds of its creators.

This was likely facilitated in part due to the “balanced” approach that the COI took in its report and its media outreach, which helped counter accusations that the report would be overly biased against Israel. Despite many criticisms of this approach (since the war, like the wider conflict, was grossly asymmetric), the report’s style and content made it difficult for the EU states to reject its findings. Moreover, despite’s Israel’s campaign to delegitimize the COI by targeting its former chair William Schabas, many EU diplomats recognized that the Commissioners and their staff were operating with professionalism and consideration for all sides of the conflict.

Palestinian school girls walk across a destroyed part of Shujayea neighborhood, Gaza city, November 4th, 2014. (Photo by Anne Paq/Activestills.org)

Palestinian school girls walk across a destroyed part of Shujayea neighborhood, Gaza city, November 4th, 2014. (Photo by Anne Paq/Activestills.org)

The new COI report was thus able to achieve what the Goldstone report could not, in that it has offered a new gateway for confronting the EU to demand accountability for the devastating Gaza war. Some critics are displeased that this has come at the price of reducing the resolution’s harsh criticism of Israel’s human rights violations, but this is a small price that is arguably worth paying given the Human Rights Council’s long line of defunct documents on the subject. If the report is to have any impact on the conflict, the more important objective would be to rally momentum among Israel’s key political and economic partners to pressure Israel and the Palestinians to comply with and implement its recommendations, including the call to cooperate with the preliminary examination of the International Criminal Court (ICC).

This is a difficult if not impossible task, since the EU states have other strategic interests at play in the region that would make accountability the least of its priorities, despite its rhetoric in support of it. But at worst, the COI report can serve as a new benchmark to name and shame the EU if (read: when) the next war in Gaza unfolds and worsens the conflict even further. Then it will be clear that the “prevalence of impunity” described in the COI’s report is not just the result of the Israeli and Palestinian warring parties, but by their foreign allies’ refusal to prevent a repetition of the violence when they had the chance.

Newsletter banner

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article
  • LEAVE A COMMENT

    * Required

    COMMENTS

    1. Bruce Gould

      “Shoot and lie: Israeli Forces Are Killing Civilians With Impunity”:

      https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/articles/debate/19862-shoot-and-lie-israeli-forces-are-killing-civilians-with-impunity

      In the Israeli authorities’ version of events, as “dozens” of Palestinians threw stones at the security forces, one “demonstrator” was injured. The Jewish Press, a right-wing, US-based news site, described Damiri as “one of the rioters.”

      The police’s claims soon came unstuck, however, as security camera footage emerged showing how Damiri had indeed been shot while simply standing in the shop. This was the second time in just 24 hours that a story spun by Israeli forces following Palestinian casualties had been exposed.

      On Sunday, B’Tselem published video footage of the moments leading up to the murder of 17-year-old Palestinian Muhammad Kasbeh at the hands of the Israeli army’s Colonel Yisrael Shomer. Kasbeh was killed on July 3 in a-Ram, near the Qalandiya checkpoint.

      Reply to Comment
      • Ben

        I well remember a predictable poster just a week ago instantly and mechanically generating the usual dodge: “the video has been doctored.” The same kind of poster who accuses others of being “shills.” Can you believe it?

        “No one wants to hear what’s really going on in the occupied territories. No one wants the dirt from the backyard to get to the front. It’s time to put the dirt so that everyone can see and that we can all begin to address it” -Yehuda Shaul, founder of Breaking the Silence

        Reply to Comment