+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

Israel’s Knesset gives a nod to settlement labels

In order to give preference to contractors located in West Bank settlements, won’t Israel’s parliament first have to distinguish them just as the EU plans to?

Maale Adumim settlement near east of Jerusalem (Activestills.org)

The settlement of Ma’ale Adumim, located east of Jerusalem. (Activestills.org)

A key parliamentary committee advanced a draft law on Monday that would require the Knesset to give preference to West Bank settlement businesses in one-quarter of the goods and services it contracts.

The bill, sponsored by Likud MK David Bitan, is an attempt to strengthen Israeli businesses in the occupied West Bank in response to European plans to label settlement goods. The bill must still pass a number of legislative hurdles before becoming law.

MK Dov Khenin, of the Arab-Jewish Hadash party, was quick to point out the irony of the bill.

“In order to give a real preference to settlement products you need to [label] them, and in doing so, the Knesset is joining the growing worldwide trend toward labeling settlement products,” Khenin said following the committee hearing.

The European Parliament last month officially endorsed the labeling of settlement products, an official EU policy goal that has gone unimplemented for years. The EU’s free trade agreement with Israel has always demanded the distinction of settlement goods. Imports from the West Bank are subject to EU tariffs, unlike products produced inside Israel proper.

Before the Knesset Committee hearing on Monday, committee chairman MK Bitan attempted a shame the left-of-Likud Zionist parties into voting for his bill. Bitan added language that gives the same Knesset purchasing preference to other “periphery” areas in Israel, namely the Galilee and Negev.

And it worked, kind of. A few hours after the Knesset hearing the headline on right-wing news website NRG read: “Because of [the West Bank]: The Zionist Camp voted against the Galilee and the Nevev.”

Palestinians Burn Settlment Products in Front of the Karmei Tzur Settlement. Picture Credit: Joseph Dana

Palestinians burn settlement goods in front of the settlement of Karmei Tzur, West Bank. (photo: Joseph Dana)

It is through bills like this that the peculiarity of official Israel’s relationship with its West Bank settlements comes into focus. Whereas most governments give preference in bidding for contracts to suppliers and manufacturers located inside their own country, Israel is trying to do the same for business located outside of its borders.

Historically careful not to officially annex any parts of the West Bank — setting aside East Jerusalem for a moment — the Israeli government makes little distinction between its governance of areas within the area internationally recognized as its own and the “areas under its control” — the occupied West Bank.

That lack of distinction is most on display in attempts to fight boycott efforts. Instead of differentiating boycotts that target only Israeli settlements (“Zionist BDS,” as Peter Beinhart calls the strategy), whose trade and exports are marginal in comparison to the economy inside Israel proper, Israel has doubled down and rejected the ideas of even its most supportive critics, arguing that there is no difference between West Bank settlements and Israel.

In that, the Israeli government and its right-wing base is correct. A blurred-into-oblivion Green Line is more reflective of reality on the ground than attempts to boycott or isolate only those Israeli entities and commercial ventures located or operating in the West Bank.

What is one to do with a national, Tel Aviv-based bank that funds construction in West Bank settlements? How about petrol companies that own and operate gas stations in the settlements? What about national infrastructure entities that literally build the segregated roads that serve settlements and supply electricity, cellular towers and water to outposts even the Israeli government considers illegal? And what of state agencies like the Israel Police that draw on the manpower and resources of their Israel-based organization to run their West Bank operations?

Soon it will be possible to say the same of the Knesset itself.

Newsletter banner

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article

    * Required


    1. Ginger Eis

      This article can best be summed up in four words: Fallacy Of False Equivalence.

      That’s a fatal error that destroys the entire theme of this article which Mr. Michael Omer-Man spent an enormous amount of time writing!

      The article fails in whole – miserably.

      Reply to Comment
    2. Ben

      Michael Omer-Mann is right on target as usual. The article succeeds – admirably. But then the author asks, “What is one to do….? “ Yes, well those who are not citizens of Israel and therefore not subject to Israel’s effective censorship of its own citizens on this matter, are in a position to speak to this more directly. Such individuals have proposed that Israelis be taken at their word and treated the same as West Bank settlers. That is, most Israelis insist that whenever boycott of settlement products is proposed, that “Ariel is Tel Aviv, we are all Israelis.” OK, have it your way Israelis.

      Reply to Comment
    3. SkyHawk

      The FRENCH Supreme Court has Ruled:

      BDS unlawful and that BDS is racist in that it discriminates against others on the basis of their national origin – i.e. Jews, and Jew alone!


      According to the Supreme Court of France supporters and promoters of BDS against the Jewish State and its industrious and entrepreneurs citizens, are in fact practicing discrimination against Jews, while at the same time preaching against what they claim is discrimination against Arabs who are called “Palestinians” and hiding behind their imaginary violations of their “human rights”.

      Reply to Comment