+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

Why Mizrahim don't vote for the Left

It is no wonder that Mizrahim vote for right-wing parties when the Ashkenazi-dominated Left has done everything in its power to exclude them. Want things to change? Start talking about Ashkenazi privilege.

By Tom Mehager

Those who have, historically, voted for Israel’s left-wing camp are often nicknamed “the white tribe.” On the other hand, the right wing enjoys a high percentage of Mizrahi voters. Why? In the run-up to the elections, it might be worth taking a look at this question.

Tzipi Livni and Isaac Herzog announce a joint slate for the upcoming elections, December 10, 2014. (Photo by Activestills.org)

Tzipi Livni and Isaac Herzog. Will they speak about Mizrahi issues this time around? (Photo by Activestills.org)

First of all, the social categories “Mizrahim” and “Asheknazis” are nowhere to be found in the platforms of Israel’s leftist parties. While the platforms of Labor (the “Zionist Camp”), Meretz and Hadash include, among other things, social issues relevant to both central Israel and the periphery, these parties base themselves on a colorblind worldview that believes that “there is no such thing as Mizrahim and Ashkenazim anymore.” But that’s just it – there is such a thing. When it comes to many issues, Mizrahim were and still are a group that faces discrimination, when compared to Ashkenazim. And yet, left-wing parties choose to totally ignore this fact.

1. Representation

Amir Peretz stood at the helm of the Labor Party during the 2006 elections, while Ehud Barak headed the party during the 2009 elections. A comparison between the percentage of people who voted for Peretz and Barak reveals a clear-cut picture: Peretz, a Mizrahi leader from the periphery, significantly raised the percentage of Labor voters among the Mizrahi public.

For example, in Sderot (Peretz’s hometown) 24.57 percent of voters gave their vote to Labor, as opposed to 5.31 percent who voted for Barak. In Dimona 17.49 percent voted for Peretz, while only 5.31 percent voted for Barak. In Shlomi 20.74 percent for Peretz, and 5.99 percent for Barak. In Yeruham 14.9 percent for Peretz, as opposed to 4.21 percent for Barak. Labor won 19 Knesset seats under Peretz, winning only 13 under Barak.

Amir Peretz (photo: Yotam Ronen / activestills.org)

Amir Peretz. (photo: Yotam Ronen / activestills.org)

It is true that the Labor Party, which openly supported Operation Protective Edge, and Meretz, which silently supported the war until a very late stage, are not worthy of being called “Left.” What is clear, however, is that there is a huge potential to mobilize Mizrahi voters. On the other hand, Israel’s left-wing parties systematically exclude Mizrahim; Labor, Meretz and Hadash reserve spots for women and Arabs (Labor saves spot 18 for a representative of the kibbutz movement), yet they still push aside Mizrahim.

The Jewish-Arab Hadash party still talks about Charlie Bitton, a Mizrahi Black Panther turned member of Knesset, yet it doesn’t seem like they are working toward including Jewish representation from the periphery any time soon. In Meretz, Mossi Raz was chosen to an unrealistic sixth place on the party list, and he deals mostly with the occupation, rather than with the interests of the Mizrahi public. The situation in the “Zionist Camp” is slightly better – Amir Peretz and Eitan Cabel are high up on the party list, and Prof. Yossi Yona has a good chance of making it into the next Knesset. However, the party is still led by Isaac Herzog, Tzipi Livni and Prof. Manuel Trajtenberg. So while leftist parties rightfully work toward a more respectable representation for women and Arabs in their ranks, they still exclude Mizrahim. Furthermore, these parties never speak up about the lack of Mizrahim in academia, human rights organizations or as judges in Israel’s courts. On the other hand, people such as Minister of Internal Affairs Gilad Erdan have openly spoken out against the lack of Mizrahi judges on Israel’s Supreme Court.

2. Education

Israel’s education system is racist toward Mizrahim. Most vocational students are either Mizrahi or Arab students, whereas a majority of Ashkenazim are enrolled in the formal, matriculation system. It is no surprise that Amir Peretz and Meir Cohen, both Mizrahi politicans from development towns, supported Minister Silvan Shalom when he told Prime Minister Netanyahu that his son “should go be a metal worker” during a heated cabinet meeting on education.

But where was the Left in this story? Aside from Labor MK Shelly Yachimovich, who wrote an important response to the Shalom/Netanyahu confrontation on her Facebook page, Labor, Meretz and Hadash kept mum. None of the parties’ platforms talk about Israel’s discriminatory education system. How can it be that parties who claim to promote equal opportunity, good education and the bridging of gaps, remain silent in the face of these policies?

Naftali Bennett speaks to a young Israeli. (photo: Naftali Bennett's official Facebook page)

Naftali Bennett speaks to a young Israeli about his educational opportunities. Does the Left really offer an alternative? (photo: Naftali Bennett’s official Facebook page)

Furthermore, the history of Jews who came to Israel from Arab and Muslim countries is entirely missing from the curriculum. Almost every student learns about the waves of immigration from Europe at the end of the 19th century, as well as about the pogroms and the Holocaust. But they do not learn a thing about the history or culture of the communities that came here from Arab and Muslim countries. More than a decade ago, Education Minister Limor Livnat tried to improve the situation after pressure from the Mizrahi Democratic Rainbow Coalition (an umbrella group of Mizrahi social justice activists). However the changes have since been rescinded, and the Left remains silent.

3. Land

Recently the kibbutz movement signed an agreement with the Israel Land Authority (ILA), which would allow kibbutzim to buy land directly from the ILA, thus “preserving the kibbutz way of life” and ensuring no state control over the purchased properties.

In a press release, the kibbutz movement responded to the agreement as follows: “After repeated delays, and almost 20 years of an unstable relationship between the ILA and the kibbutz movement, and many long months during which the kibbutzim around Gaza stood in the first line of fire during Operation Protective Edge, the Israel Land Authority Council made an important decision on this matter, according to which the ILA will have no claims to the areas purchased by the kibbutz that are intended for housing…”

First of all, what does “standing in the first line of fire” have to do with an economic agreement? Didn’t the people of Ashkelon, Rahat and Sderot all stand in the first line of fire? Secondly, the kibbutzim are the only sector in the country that owns such a large amount of such one valuable resource, so much so that it is able to negotiate with the state over its use. Nearly every Israeli citizen from the lower-middle class faces housing difficulties, especially in the mostly-Mizrahi populated development towns and the Arab cities and villages. Only the kibbutzim get to sign an agreement that improves their housing situation.

Woman near shattered window caused by a Hamas rocket on July 15, 2014 in the town of Sderot, Israel. (Photo by Activestills.org)

A woman stands near shattered window caused by a Hamas rocket during Operation Protective Edge, Sderot, Israel. Mizrahim, like kibbutzim in the south, are in the first line of fire from Gaza. (Photo by Activestills.org)

It is important to note that Housing and Construction Minister Uri Ariel, who handed over a large number of apartments that were originally intended for public housing to national-religious institutions, praised the ILA agreement’s with the kibbutz movement. Moreover, Bentzi Liberman, the former head of the Yesha Council (an umbrella organization of municipal councils of West Bank settlements) who is being investigated on corruption charges, is the current chairman of the Israel Land Authority and is primarily responsible for the deal. Not only do left-wing parties offer very little in the face of unequal distribution of resources, representatives of both Labor and Meretz actually support the agreement. The others? They simply shut up. On the other hand, former Interior Minister Gideon Sa’ar previously promoted and put into action a plan that slightly ameliorated the situation.

4. History

Today we know that the medical establishment and welfare authorities in Israel took children from families that immigrated from Yemen, the Balkans and other countries, and lied to the parents over their fate. We also know about the nearly 70,000 children who were sprayed with pesticide after immigrating from North Africa, falling victim to the state’s racist behavior in the 1950s.

Yemenite Jews walking to a ‘reception camp’ near Aden, 1949. (Photo by Kluger Zoltan/Israel National Archive)

Yemenite Jews walking to a ‘reception camp’ near Aden, Yemen, 1949. (Photo by Kluger Zoltan/Israel National Archive)

One of the most significant components in the reconciliation between two groups is recognizing the injustices of the past. It is crucial to publicly recognize the crimes perpetrated by Israel’s authorities, as well as compensate the victims and teach this history in school. The Israeli Left is supposed to lead such public calls against racism and historical injustices. But even here, it ceases to function.

5. Culture and identity

A study conducted by the Ministry of Economy in 2013 showed that candidates with an Ashkenazi-sounding last names have a better chance of being invited to a job interview, as opposed to candidates with Mizrahi-sounding last names.

The reason for this is image-related. Since the founding of the state, Western culture has always been seen as supreme, while Mizrahi culture was seen as primitive and weak. This worldview became popular, especially due to the fact that Israel is seen of as a Western outpost in the Middle East, or as Ehud Barak put it: “a villa in the jungle.” This is the reason that Mizrahi music is almost never played on public radio stations, or why television commercials are full of white characters, except when they cast someone to play a worker or a criminal.

A multicultural approach does not accept the assumption that one culture is better than the other. Every community in Israel has its own significant cultural attributes, and making room for them in the public sphere is not only a moral act, it will also an act that will enrich our society. Even in this aspect, the Left stagnates.

* * *

But despite the aforementioned initiatives of Erdan, Livnat and Sa’ar, the Right is also blind to the interests of the Mizrahi public. Shas under Aryeh Deri and Moshe Kahlon’s Kulanu party are not seen as either left or right, but they will attract a significant number of voters from the Mizrahi public, first and for most because they are parties established by Mizrahim. Not to mention the fact that they both speak about the interests of the Mizrahi public, whether directly (Deri) or indirectly (Kahlon). They are, in effect, the Mizrahi parallel of Yair Lapid’s Yesh Atid party, which does not align itself with either the Left or the Right, but rather caters to the needs of upper-middle class Ashkenazim.

Moshe Kahlon (Photo by Activestills.org)

Moshe Kahlon. Looking out for Mizrahi interests isn’t necessarily a partisan issue. (Photo by Activestills.org)

Two historical facts make the Right, and especially Likud, into a natural political home for Mizrahim: first off, the Left built a regime of privileges that benefit Ashkenazim, and continues to resist any attempt to challenge it. Until the “revolution” of 1977, when Likud was elected to lead the country for the first time, Mizrahim voted in high numbers for Mapai, Labor’s predecessor. Since then (aside from the 2006 elections), Mizrahim have viewed the Left as part of the Ashkenazi elite, and rightly so. Secondly, Mizrahim have adopted vehement Zionist-nationalist positions, after they were made to renounce their Arab culture by successive Israeli governments. Therefore, even if the Right doesn’t speak clearly about the interests of the Mizrahi public, it at leasts provides an alternative political home to the Ashkenazi Left.

For the Ashkenazi public, however, voting for the Left is a pretty good deal: they vote for parties that are ostensibly enlightened and moral, while totally ignoring the historical relationship between Ashkenazim and Mizrahim, as well as the privileges they enjoy until this very day. But without talking about Ashkenazi privilege in a clear and direct manner, there will be no real change in this country.

Tom Mehager is a Mizarahi activist and a graduate student of political science. This article was first published in Hebrew on Haokets.

The struggle for Mizrahi recognition isn’t limited to Israel
Yemenite Children Affair: Families of the kidnapped speak out
‘How can this monkey be talking about an ideology that developed in Europe?’

Special Coverage: 2015 Elections

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article

    * Required


    1. Ben Zakkai

      Okay, so Mizrahi Jews have suffered a long history of discrimination by the Ashkenazi elite, and that same elite is highly visible on the Israeli Left, so maybe that gives Mizrahis a reason to vote for the Right. But has Bibi’s corrupt-capitalist Likud really brought tangible economic and status improvements to Mizrahi Jews? Nope, Bibi has almost always served the fat cats at the expense of the poor, a disproportionate number of whom are Mizrahi. The reason they vote Likud anyway is closer to the gut: when you’re part of the majority but low down on the totem pole, the easiest way to feel better is by hating the minority. Like in the US, who hates blacks more than poor whites? And Mizrahi Jews, who share much cultural heritage with Arabs, have even more reason to distinguish themselves from Arabs and prove their Jewish bona fides by going all national-religious and hating on the Arabs. Meanwhile the Right gathers up their votes, feeds their hatred, throws them an occasional bone and laughs at them. Sorry Mizrahis, until you develop your minds and hearts to the point where wisdom and decency drive you to treat Arabs better, I can’t generate too much sympathy for all your sob stories.

      Reply to Comment
      • Deborah

        But why should Mizrahis have to distinguish themselves from Arabs, if they are Arab?

        Reply to Comment
        • Pedro X

          They are not Arab. They are Jewish Israelis. As other Israelis do, they vote for whomever they choose.

          Reply to Comment
    2. William Burns

      Interesting argument, but there’s another reason here. Mizrahis occupy the intermediate position occupied by working-class and poor whites in the Jim Crow South. Whatever they don’t have economically, they have the privileges of being Jews in the Jewish state. Since Jewish privilege is the main thing they have, they’re going to vote for the side that is most explicitly dedicated to maintaining it. That happens to be the right (not that the Israeli Jewish left is particularly dedicated to dismantling Jewish privilege, but they aren’t as completely committed to it as the right.)

      Reply to Comment
    3. Paldi5

      I believe that the key to a one state future with everyone given the vote is predicated on the Mizrahi’s forming their own political party or joining the new United Democratic Arab party. (With a name change to just “United Democratic”.)

      Reply to Comment
    4. “Mizrahis have adopted vehement Zionist-nationalist positions, after they were made to renounce their Arab culture by successive Israeli governments.” Maybe they adopted Zionist nationalist positions because they believe in them, not because of anything anybody did to them? Maybe they believe in power, and in an us-vs.-them Judaism because they see the Arabs fighting Israel, and they just want to fight back and win? You don’t have to be Mizrahi to be that sort of Jew. Maybe the Left should give the right-wing Mizrahim credit for coming to their political beliefs on their own power, instead of always being the object of leftist power? Leftist power – that’s been a joke for a long time, anyway.

      Reply to Comment
      • Gustav

        Good post Larry

        Reply to Comment
      • Paldi5

        I disagree, they are being disrespected by both the right and the left. One can feel “protected” and serve in the army to assure one is protected. No need to suck up to Ashkenazi. Form your own party and get into a governing coalition. Almost half the country is Mizrahi.

        Reply to Comment
    5. Gustav

      “Almost half the country is Mizrahi”

      More than half of the country is Mizrahi/Sephardi.

      Mizrahim/Sephardim are not being disrespected more than any other groups. We tend to take the mickey out of each other in a good natured way but at the end of the day, we are all brothers because we are all Israelis and we face common threats.

      Reply to Comment
    6. Bryan

      “A multicultural approach does not accept the assumption that one culture is better than the other. Every community in Israel has its own significant cultural attributes, and making room for them in the public sphere is not only a moral act, it will also an act that will enrich our society.” And all that sad propaganda directed at Israel is completely unfair – if only it was correctly translated we’d find that young Jews rampaging through Jerusalem, supposedly chanting “Death to Arabs” are actually imploring the government to “enrich our society even more, please”, the President has not referred to Israeli racism as a moral sickness, and Lieberman is advocating that there is room in the public sphere for all cultures, and Israel has lessons to teach Europe on genuine multi-culturalism.

      Reply to Comment
      • ICat

        Again, no coherent thought-process; chaotic internal logic and no decipherable point. All in all: another mumbo jumbo from a pretentious turd.

        Reply to Comment
    7. Mordi P

      As in most countries the founders of the state will always be the leaders. Look at the US, the UK, and others. The establishment will be the ones in power, be they right or Left. The Mizrahim lived a comparative stones throw from what was Palestine, but it took those awful Ashkenazim from Russia to lay down the roots that eventually became Israel.The Mizrahim have a chip on their shoulder that it’s about time they got rid of. Yes they were and are discriminated against. But they made their situation worse when they voted in the right wing government of Manachem Begin. They thought under him they would get equality. Well look at Begin’s successor Netanyahu how many Sapharadim does he have in his cabinet, none. They are their own worst enemy. Only when they will stop thinking of themselves as second class citizens will their lot improve the army has shown that this can happen. We have had several Chiefs of Staff of Saphardi origins, and two Presidents, though one ended badly, not due to his origin though.

      Reply to Comment
    8. Mikesailor

      The Mizrahim remind me of the “crackers and rednecks” of the 60’s to the present. They were always discriminated against in jobs, education, housing, etc. by the wealthier Democrats in the region. Remember the definition of a “Yellow-dog Democrat”? It was one who would vote for a “Yellow-dog” as long as the dog was a Democrat. With the signing of the Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts of the 1960″s, these Democrats became Republicans en masse. Why? The Republicans had been and presently are even worse for the education, housing and jobs requirements in the South than the Democrats. Weren’t these new Republican conservatives somehow voting for a status quo that keeps them as an underclass? Perhaps. But they are still, within their social grouping, considered a higher class socially than the blacks of the time. The most interesting phenomena is how much the youth and their view of racial relationships is so unlike that of their parents and grandparents. They are far more open to cross-racial friendships and even marriages, let alone educational opportunities and employment hiring. So the Mizrahi youth emulate this trend? Or are they stuck in the past like their preceding generations? Should the Jew give up on separate schools and integrate their classrooms with an eye toward a fairer future society? Or is this directly in opposition to the Zionist ideal?

      Reply to Comment
    9. Viktor Arajs

      Look, the so called Mizrachi are occupying Palestine. Instead of trying to get them to vote for you, which they never will, try to get them to exercise their Right of Return to Iraq, Iran, Mororcco, etc, so the Palestinians can enjoy their Right of Return

      Reply to Comment
    10. saja

      Tamtoom <3

      Reply to Comment
    11. Although I applaud your efforts to shed some light on discrimination against the non-ashkenazi public in Israel (which includes arabs as well as jews), it’s unfortunate you’ve failed to distingiush the sepharadim from the mizrahim – even going so far as to call Amir Peretz, a sepharadi originally from Marocco, MIZRAHI. Anyone with an ounce of knowledge knows that, despite any similarity between the two groups, there are major differences between the two groups, ESPECIALLY when it comes to political outlook. And it has nothing to do with any alleged discrimination by the labor party with regards to said groups (which I believe is more of a societal problem than anything else) and EVERYTHING with their views towards the arab minority. This causes some groups to exhibit a general preferance towards the more anti-arab likud over the more pro-arab labor party despite the labor party being far more suitable to their economical needs.

      Reply to Comment