+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

Why it may be time to rethink Abbas

There is great desire and momentum for change in Israel and Palestine, yet a dire lack of leadership to harness it. If given the international support he needs, could Mahmoud Abbas be the one to guide that change?

By Abraham Gutman

Last week, on my way to listen to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas speak at Cooper Union, I was talking to my sister on the phone. I told her that I wasn’t sure how I was supposed to feel going into the speech. As an Israeli, I tend to automatically get defensive when it comes to issues of Israel and Palestine. But as a strong proponent of the two-state-solution, and one who believes that peace is possible, I was excited to hear what Abbas had to say. One of the first sentences of his address, which also became one of the main themes of his speech, was “I came here to ask you to rethink Palestine.” I am writing this now to ask you to rethink Abbas.

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas addresses students at the Great Hall of The Cooper Union, New York City, September 22, 2014. (photo: Abraham Gutman)

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas addresses students at the Great Hall of The Cooper Union, New York City, September 22, 2014. (photo: Abraham Gutman)

Unlike Netanyahu, Abbas doesn’t have a perfect American accent when he speaks English, nor the charm and charisma of Barak Obama, but when was the last time that either of them received a standing ovation from a room full of both “pro-Israel” and “pro-Palestine” students? “Prime Minister Netanyahu: End the occupation, make peace!” Abbas repeated. I was sold.

Don’t get me wrong, it’s not that I think Netanyahu was just waiting for Abbas to demand an end to the occupation, and now that’s it, problem solved. But as an Israeli it is so rare to feel part of the solution. Most of the time I find myself defending the problem with statements I don’t really believe, just because I feel trapped and on the defensive.

Abbas shared with the audience his prayer for peace: “Will you join this old man in his prayer? Will you help me to build a peaceful world? I am sure your answer is yes, we will.” Israel lacks leadership, and Israel’s government lacks moral fiber. What if Abbas is the leader the Middle East needs? What if Abbas is the leader the world needs? In this time of identity politics and wakening of self-determination movements all over the world, from Palestine to the Basque lands, Scotland to Taiwan, the world needs a symbol. Let’s make this old man a symbol, a champion of diplomacy, self-determination, conflict resolution, equality and non-violence.

As expected, some on Twitter weren’t as excited about the speech as I was. Criticism ranged from Abbas being “too soft,” to him “normalizing the occupation.” I disagree. I believe Abbas dared to dissent from Netanyahu’s approach to peace negotiations. By making a habit of pointing fingers at the Palestinian Authority and blaming it for the failure of negotiations before they even begin, Israel’s leaders have repeatedly shown that it’s Israel that isn’t a partner for peace. It would be pointless for Abbas to take the same approach and blame the Israelis; how does a rejection of peace talks serve the Palestinian people?

It’s clear, however, that the tide is turning on Israel. This past summer, during the Gaza war, voices emerged in the U.S. that hadn’t been heard before in the mainstream discourse. Groups such as ‘If Not Now’ seem to have become the voice of American-Jewish Millennials, a voice that does not automatically support Israeli government policies, a voice that believes self-criticism is grounded in Jewish thinking, a voice that calls for an end to the occupation. And still, it seems that the pro-peace community is deeply divided.

“In the language of youth, there is no such word as tired. In the vocabulary of youth, there is no such word as failure,” declared Abbas. We must pressure Israel to end the occupation and honestly join the negotiating table. We must act so the international community will join that pressure. I believe that Abbas can lead that movement, but we have to allow him.

The day before Abbas’ Cooper Union speech, I was at the 92nd Street Y, a Jewish community center in New York City, for the annual Social Good Summit. One of the panels was about a new social initiative and film titled Beyond Right and Wrong, which presents stories of reconciliation from all over the world. On the stage, next to the producer, were three parents who had lost children in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. They all denounced the occupation. “People aren’t free in Palestine; it is not Jewish, and opposing it is not anti-Semitic,” said Rami Elhanan, who lost his daughter in a terror attack in Jerusalem in 1997. He added that between hate and forgiveness is a space called reconciliation; that is the space that we should aspire to.

There is great desire and momentum for change, yet a dire lack of leadership to harness it. Let’s rethink Abbas as a leader. Some might dismiss him as having lost legitimacy among his own people, but that doesn’t prove anything. With no change in the status quo, wouldn’t you, as a Palestinian, be frustrated with your leader? Abbas isn’t inherently illegitimate; he can regain his relevance in Palestine if there’s a break in the status quo, and a true process for peace is initiated. Others might say that Abbas makes inflammatory statements, such as the genocide comment in his UN General Assembly speech last week, but there was a wider message and more than one sentence in that speech.

As the international community, it is up to us to empower Abbas and his message of non-violence. Most importantly, when Abbas reaches out and extends his hand, let us all demand that Israel does the same, so it too can become a real partner for peace.

Abraham Gutman is originally from Tel Aviv, and is currently enrolled in a dual BA/MA program in economics in New York City. He tweets from @abgutman.

Related:
Accusing Israel of ‘genocide’: Major fail
Watch out war criminals, Mahmoud Abbas is coming for you
Now is the time for American Jews to speak up on Israel

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article
  • LEAVE A COMMENT

    * Required

    COMMENTS

    1. bir

      “As the international community, it is up to us to empower Abbas and his message of non-violence. Most importantly, when Abbas reaches out and extends his hand, let us all demand that Israel does the same, so it too can become a real partner for peace.”

      This is delusional. Did you not hear Abbas speak at the UN a day or two after speaking at Cooper Union?

      He lied about Israel.
      He lied about genocide.
      He demanded a “solution” that gave no suggestion or hint at any compromise with Israel over Judaism’s holiest sites.
      He claimed to be one and the same as the pre-1967 fedayeen – that’s right, Palestinian terrorists from before the occupation even began.

      This is the person you wish to empower? You think his message is one of non-violence?

      Grow up.

      Reply to Comment
      • Urooj

        if you can’t acknowledge that Israel is engaging in acts of genocide.. and has engaged in acts of genocide since 1948.. then you are delusional… you have not seen the extent to which the israeli government will go to cleanse Palestinians from their indigenous land.. and i take it you don’t care for the Russell Tribunal’s findings either… either way a 2 state solution is no longer possible since the israeli government continues to illegally annex land in the West Bank.. 1000 more hectares of land in bethlehem.. continuing settlements… those are not actions of a government that wants peace.. the israeli fascist terror state wants to silence dissent against its illegal policies and will kill those in the west bank and gaza if necessary.. especially as Gaza is a constant reminder that the state of Israel is one big colonizing power that force ably displaced millions of Palestinians.. many of those in Gaza are from present-day Israel.. Israel the world to forget about that.. u need to listen to Miko Peled (if you haven’t already)

        Reply to Comment
      • Felix Reichert

        His message is more about non-violence than Netanyahu’s. That’s a fact.

        Reply to Comment
        • bir

          Sure, because he ignored all the Hamas rockets.

          Reply to Comment
    2. Mikesailor

      This is a remarkably silly article. Abbas is a Quisling, paid for by both: the Israelis and the Americans. Otherwise he would have resigned his position and dissolved the PA when his elected term ended. He had a choice then: to call for new elections under Palestinian auspices without regard to outside (Zionist) objections or to end the farce the PA has become. After all, when the Israelis began jailoing Hamas elected officials, Abbas was conspicuosly silent. He chose to stay on. Now he wants a deadline for borders yet, again he stops before bringing out the only leverage available to the Palestinians: the bringing of a suit in the ICC. Why hasn’t he propsed a real deadline with the ICC waiting at the end if the propsal is denied? Why hasn’t he mentioned US obstructionism and collusion with the Israelis in war crimes? (The colonization of occupied territory for starters) Why not use everything in your diplomatic quiver? Unless, of course, what you are gaining from the status quo is worth more than taking a chance on independence. Why do you think Hamas is gaining in popularity on the West Bank? Becaue they have the intestinal fortitude to say: “NO MORE”. What does Abbas have? Nothing much except hot air.

      Reply to Comment
    3. Kolumn8

      It may also be time to rethink the telegraph.

      When Mr. Abbas (not a legitimate president) accepts Israel as a Jewish State and stops telling his people that he is working on eliminating Israel by flooding it with Arabs, then I’ll rethink him. Until then he is just another Arab that wants to destroy Israel except that he thinks he can do so by getting the world to do it rather than by the Arabs doing it themselves. That is Abbas’ message when he is talking to other Arabs, not “non-violence” and not “peace”. Back home he presides over state funerals for the remains of suicide bombers that blew up Israeli women and children while naming squares and streets after terrorists whose sole claim to fame is the murder of Israeli civilians. He funds terrorists sitting in prison for murdering Israeli civilians, with those that killed more getting more money. He sits in a government with an internationally recognized terrorist group and seems perfectly able to find a compromise position with a group that is dedicated to destroying Israel.

      You can rethink him all you want. I already have. I once thought there might be a difference between Abbas and Hamas on the core issues, but there isn’t. Both Abbas’ movement Fatah and Hamas are perfectly happy to kill Israeli civilians as a tactic and Abbas himself honors suicide bombers and other terrorists as heroes. Both would be willing to accept a temporary state if it makes them stronger for the next round of hostilities against Israel. Neither would accept any agreement that ends the conflict because both are dedicated to eliminating Israel. The only differences are in the immediate tactics used, not in any core positions.

      Reply to Comment