+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

Israelis don't understand Palestinian fears over Jerusalem

For Israelis, Jerusalem is an archaeological treasure. For Palestinians, it is a city whose heritage and identity are constantly under threat.

By Yonathan Mizrachi

Archaeologists digging at a digging site of the remains of a citadel used by the Greeks more then 2,000 years ago to control the Temple Mount at the City of David near Jerusalem Old City on November 3, 2015, According to the Israeli Antiquities Authority the site was found under a parking lot a few years ago also know as Givati Parking Lot. (photo: Yonatan Sindel/Flash90)

Archaeologists digging at a digging site of the remains of a citadel used by the Greeks more then 2,000 years ago to control the Temple Mount at the City of David near Jerusalem Old City on November 3, 2015, According to the Israeli Antiquities Authority the site was found under a parking lot a few years ago also know as Givati Parking Lot. (photo: Yonatan Sindel/Flash90)

It turns out that issues of identity, religion and recognition are far more critical to East Jerusalem Palestinians than what the Israeli Right and center would have us believe. A new survey shows that East Jerusalemites are more concerned with Jewish pilgrimage to the Temple Mount/Haram al-Sharif and archaeological excavations than issues such as lack of infrastructure and the denial of construction permits.

The survey, commissioned by Israeli NGO Emek Shaveh, an organization of archaeologists and community activists focusing on the role of archaeology in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, asked East Jerusalem residents what issue concerns them the most in heir home city.

The survey was carried out by the Smith Institute, and included 500 individuals representing Israel’s adult population (Jews and Muslims, ages 18 and older).

According to the findings, 67 percent chose Jewish pilgrimage to the Temple Mount, while 44 percent responded that archaeological excavations concern them most. Forty-one percent of respondents say the denial of construction permits is most important to them, while 30 percent believe the lack of infrastructure is of top priority.

Contrary to the view that providing a higher standard of living and better housing for East Jerusalem’s residents will resolve the tensions in the city — a position that both rightists and centrists seek to advance — the results of the survey suggest the threat to Palestinian identity and the violation of Jerusalem’s symbolic status are of greater concern.

The survey further shows that Israeli Jews and Palestinians in Jerusalem hold completely different attitudes toward the city’s archaeology. The participants were asked their opinion about the purpose of archaeological excavations in the Old City, to which they were able to choose from up to two responses. Eighty percent of Israeli Jews believe that the objectives of archaeological excavations in the Old City and the East Jerusalem neighborhood of Silwan are purely scientific — that is, to find historical evidence of life in the city throughout history.

Among East Jerusalem Palestinians, on the other hand, the most notable responses were to strengthen the Jewish hold on Jerusalem (53 percent), and to erase all remnants of Muslim history from the city (57 percent). Another 21 percent believe that the purpose of the excavations is to erase all of the city’s non-Jewish historical remnants. Only 14 percent are of the opinion that the objectives of the excavations are scientific. In other words, while most Israelis view archaeological excavations as a non-political scientific activity, the other side views them as a clear threat to the city’s heritage and identity.

How does one explain the fact that Israelis and Palestinians hold completely different attitudes toward the same phenomena? Once again we are confronted with the fact that identity, national belonging, and how each side views the past are central to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Take, for example, the archaeological activity in Silwan and excavations below the Muslim Quarter. Neither ostensibly affect their quality of life, yet Palestinians view these excavations as a greater threat than lack of investment in services and infrastructure. Despite the poverty, the conflict with Israeli settlers and the chronic lack of basic infrastructure – the primary problem for East Jerusalem Palestinians is the perceived threat to Al-Aqsa Mosque and their historical right to Jerusalem.

The Israeli position does not give due credit to these concerns, and the reason is clear: Israelis are the sovereign, and thus remain unthreatened by the archaeological authorities’ activities, whom they deem to be in line with their own national identity and collective priorities. On the other hand Palestinian residents of East Jerusalem experience the archaeological activities in their neighborhoods as both an extension of the occupation, as well as a sophisticated method of undermining their national and religious identity.

The author is an archaeologist and director of Emek Shaveh. This article was first published in Hebrew on Haokets. Read it here.

Newsletter banner

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article
  • LEAVE A COMMENT

    * Required

    COMMENTS

    1. i_like_ike52

      During the Camp David discussions between Arafat and Barak in 2000, Barak was willing to hand over control of the Temple Mount to Arafat and asked, in return, that Arafat agree to a statement in the proposed agreement that states that he recognized the fact that the Jews also view it as a holy place. Arafat adamantly refused. Clinton berated him for doing so but it didn’t help. Arafat thought he is going to tell us Jews what OUR religion and holy sites are. By what right? Any Jew, religious or not, would agree with the statement, “Muslims regard the Temple Mount as a holy site”. Is Islam so fragile and Muslims lacking in self-confidence regarding their religion that they can’t even acknowledge that other religions exist in the same space as them?

      Reply to Comment
    2. i_like_ike52

      It is ironic that a majority of east Jerusalem Arabs believe that Israel wants “erase all remnants of Muslim history from the city (57 percent)”.
      That is because they are projecting on the Jews behavior they themselves advocate regarding the Jews and other minorities if THEY were in control. It should be noted that the Muslims build mosques on top of pre-existing holy sites belonging to other religions, such as the Temple Mount in Jerusalem and other places throughout the Middle East in territories they conquered in their great imperialist war of expansion. This occurred as far away as India.
      This is done in order to show that those pre-existing religions are now superseded and that the Muslims are now in control.
      In the period between 1948 and 1967 when the Jordanians controlled the Jewish holy sites in
      Jerusalem, not only did they prohibit Jewish access to them, most notably the Western Wall, even though they had committed themselves to just than in the cease-fire agreement they signed with Israel, but they systematically destroyed all the 50+ Jewish synagogues in Jerusalem, Hevron and other places, and desecrated the 3000-year-old Jewish cemetery on the Mount of Olives. Given that their holy places and access to them are protected under Israeli rule, something they themselves refused to do for the Jews when they had control, I think they should review their attitudes and Jews and others who care about non-Muslim access to their holy places should want Israel to maintain such control, for the benefit of EVERYONE, including the Muslims.

      Reply to Comment
    3. Ben

      Gershon Baskin has debunked several crucial myths employed in defense of the occupation of Jerusalem and the West Bank. And remarks that It is ‘common during these times for people to pull out their common “knowledge” and throw it into the fire of the debate as absolute truth. All too often these statements of “truth” have become the accepted version of history, but the problem is that many of them are simply wrong.’

      Encountering Peace: Debunking myths
      By GERSHON BASKIN
      Wed, 21 Oct 2015
      http://m.jpost.com/Opinion/Encountering-Peace-Debunking-myths-428662#article=6017N0MyRjhGNzJBQzhDRDlGODRGNDZCMDE1OEVBQzY2RTQ=
      _________

      Myth: “In 1993 Israel signed a peace agreement with the Palestinians, but we have no peace.”

      Myth: “Israel has offered the Palestinians everything but they have turned down every offer and walked away.”

      Myth: “In 2005 Israel unilaterally withdrew from the Gaza Strip and gave it all to the Palestinians, not leaving a single settler or soldier there, and in return Israel got Hamas and rockets.”

      Myth: “The status quo on the Temple Mount has not changed and Israel is not changing it.”

      Reply to Comment
    4. ish yehudi

      or could equally read:
      “Secular Israeli’s don’t understand their primitive cousins relationship to Jerusalem”
      (don’t get upset just yet, the primitives here are us(me) the religious Jews) for whom Jerusalem is not “an archeological treasure.” rather the source of emanation, a place of revelation (as in Islam) and holy site.

      Reply to Comment

The stories that matter.
The missing context.
All in one weekly email.

Subscribe to +972's newsletter