+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

Why I am proud of my work for J Street

By Max Socol

In 2010, less than a year after returning to the United States from Israel, I helped establish J Street DC Metro. Like Moriel Rothman, I was deeply disturbed by Cast Lead, which had defined my time in Israel. I felt strongly that an American initiative would be needed for the bloodshed to stop, and I also felt that, for better or worse, that initiative would have to be midwifed by the American Jewish community – the only American voting bloc with the credibility to speak about Israel, the political power to make a difference, and the generally liberal values that would align with the sacrifices that needed to be made for peace.

I was under no illusions that this would be an easy process. And I agree wholly with Moriel that the window for a two-state agreement will have passed before a majority of American Jews actively identify with J Street.

Nonetheless I want to explain why I am proud of the work I have done for J Street and why I not only have no plans to stop, but on the contrary intend to increase the time and energy I expend for the group, starting with our Future of Pro-Israel campaign.

Building a coalition. There is no other Jewish organization in the world where you can hear from Stav Shaffir, Ehud Olmert, Jennifer Mizrahi, and Mustafa Barghouti under one roof. There is no other organization where you can meet with Ameinu, Gisha, B’Tselem, Friends of the Earth Middle East, Geneva Initiative, and Americans for Peace Now within 15 minutes. In three years, J Street has built an unprecedented center-left coalition.

Shaffir’s appearance, in particular, was a coup. As a representative of the most powerful social justice movement in Israeli history – one which has been ignored by the bulk of the American Jewish community – she has the potential to open a massive door for J Street into the Israeli middle. Perhaps nothing will come of her time at the conference; but the kind of open and creative thinking that led J Street to place Shaffir front and center is exactly why I support the organization.

And this isn’t only a top-down coalition. The future of pro-Israel campaign centers on a statement of principles generated by J Street activists at the grassroots level, and in the coming months the document (available on our website) will be ratified by locals across the country.

As for Ehud Olmert. Yes, he is implicated in alleged war crimes. No, he will not be arrested. Neither will any of the past three American presidents, or the prime ministers of Russia, England, or any other country that has engaged in preemptive war with high civilian casualties in the past decade. To suggest that J Street is conspicuously approving of this phenomenon is a bit like accusing it of ratifying the theory of gravity because its conference was not held on the ceiling. Ehud Olmert is the immediate past prime minister of Israel, the country that J Street hopes to influence. Until recently he was the leader of its largest voting bloc, and he retains plenty of influence despite the allegations that dog him. Turning him down for a speaking engagement would be nothing short of lunacy.

It’s not my place to tell Israelis or Palestinians how to feel about this, and I understand that he is a deal-breaker for some. But we should be realistic: whatever peace is made, it will exonerate many who are accused or guilty of terrible crimes. This is not an unintended consequence of peace after war, but a primary feature.

Positioning on Capitol Hill. As J Street activists swarmed the Hill Tuesday morning, American lawmakers swarmed our base of operations in a House office building. Representatives Dingell (D-MI), Braley (D-IA), Baldwin (D-WI), Capuano (D-MA), Lewis (D-GA), Van Hollen (D-MD), Edwards (D-MD), Polis (D-CO), and Schakowsky (D-IL) all visited with J Street members and gave short addresses, exhorting we volunteer lobbyists to continue to fight for a just and lasting peace.

Yes, AIPAC held a lot of meetings. Yes, the AIPAC/J Street dynamic still hews too closely to the first part of the Goliath/David story. But J Street held 225 meetings of its own that morning, an enormous number, and one that guarantees that while we may not have won (yet) we are far from being ignored.

For the first time, I did not have to walk into offices and explain what my organization does. Actual representatives, rather than their staff, were pleased to meet with me, knew exactly what J Street was, and were often eager to support us. And I’m not just talking about the “usual suspects” of American progressivism. I met with a number of southern Republicans who are sick of war and ready for a new approach to Israel/Palestine.

Part of this phenomenon is J Street’s rapid growth, and the amount of money it has been able to spend in key districts to support friendly congresspeople. Part of it, however, is the fact that J Street has raised its profile considerably by opposing an Iran war. Americans are tired of wars of choice, and that is filtering through to their representatives. J Street is in position to capitalize on these sentiments.

There is a larger lesson here. The left will never win if it refuses to play. Taking our ball and going home because AIPAC is so huge may feel satisfying, but it accomplishes nothing and, worse, it saps our ability to accomplish anything even in the far future. We could not have made gains on the Iran war issue this year if we weren’t already on the Hill two years ago. What future opportunities would we lose out on if we gave up now?

No one can predict how American politics will shift in the coming years, but two things are certain: they will shift, and it will be those who have already established themselves in the halls of Congress who are in position to determine the new consensus.

The long game. I feel the urgency of the situation acutely – that is why I am part of J Street to begin with. I agree with many writers on +972 Magazine who remind us that the time for a peaceful resolution is running out, though I disagree with others who claim time is already up.

However, just as we are quick to point out that Israel has been damaging itself internally for decades in order to support the occupation, we must also be willing to accept that rebuilding will also take decades. What we on the left are demanding is a major reconfiguration of what Israel looks like, how Israelis and Palestinians see themselves, and how they relate to the outside world. We do ourselves no favors by pretending that this will all magically occur when Israeli and Palestinian heads of state sign an agreement.

The coalition that J Street is building will be necessary for the acceptance of an agreement, but it will also be necessary for the future beyond that agreement. The dismantling and evacuation of settlements, reinstatement of rule of law, protection of Israel’s minority Arab population, reparations and resettlement of refugees, the division of Jerusalem and the internationalization of holy sites – every one of these tasks is immense, and many will be heartbreaking. If we are serious about a peace agreement we must begin preparing for them now, with the same commitment and dedication as our parents and grandparents employed for the creation of the state.

I do not know what is in the future for Israel and it would be ludicrous to claim that the era of Netanyahu has been an improvement. I am not, however, ready to give up, and it’s clear to me that J Street is the best hope we have.

 Max Socol is communications chair for J Street DC Metro, J Street’s grassroots presence in the DC area.

Read also:
J Street, undaunted by reality: Interview with Jeremy Ben-Ami
J Street third annual conference marks shift to the right
What’s wrong with J Street – an open letter to members
WATCH: Why does a Palestinian speak at a J Street conference?

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article

    * Required


    1. Jiddu Krishnamurti

      The first link is not working.

      Reply to Comment
    2. noam

      Wow! way to go. Well put.

      Someday this will all bear fruit. Whoever is talking about one state is not interested in a foreseeable peace. Perhaps in some sense of megalomanic “justice”, but definitely not a better life for Israelis and Palestinians.

      Reply to Comment
    3. aristeides

      Go ahead. Take your time. The Palestinians will be long gone by then, of course, but you can take comfort in the fact that you never rocked the boat for their sakes.

      Reply to Comment
    4. Noam W.

      Big tents are good in that they are inclusive, but they need to be careful not to become diluted.
      But Stav Shaffir as a leader of the most powerful social justice movement in Israel?
      What is the great success this movement has to show? The increase in gas prices or the increase in electricity prices?

      Reply to Comment
    5. Moriel Rothman

      @Max, thank you for this thoughtful piece, a lot of which I agree with. I maintain my comment that I think J Street should invest a bit more in solidifying and building its Left Wing base as it moves forward, but I certainly am far from saying that J Street should pack up and go home, and far from discounting the great importance of J Street’s voice in DC and in the US. Nor am I saying that the Left should take our ball and go home, my critique was basically that we should stop trying to mimic the moves of our opponent on the field, if you will, that we should move in a way that is more natural to us. David did not defeat Goliath, to play off of your metaphor, by trying to make his sword as big as his opponent’s.

      @Jiddu, the link to my article is the second one under the Read Also category above, “J Street conference marks a shift to the right.”

      Reply to Comment
    6. Max Socol

      @Moriel, thanks. You’ve been lumped in here for the sake of (some) brevity with two other pieces that were critical of J Street. I know you weren’t suggesting anyone walk away, but others were.
      Personally I am eager to make inroads with those who are to J Street’s left, though I’m not sure I would identify them as its base of support. My preference is only that this outreach come from positive gestures that open us up to more viewpoints, rather than closing us off from opposition (or perceived opposition.) In my view the conference represents J Street at its best – an open forum for both Peter Beinart and Donniel Hartman, so to speak.

      Reply to Comment
    7. Yehuda

      After interning for J Street I can say that the organization is completely useless. They are so driven by fear of any criticism from the right that they have become wholly ineffectual. A peace organization that is unwilling to take a stand for peace – even supporting a veto in the UNSC simply stating established US opposition to settlement expansion – is in fact dangerous. It allows those who want to think of themselves as opposing the occupation to in fact support the occupation and still feel good about themselves. The most damaging part is J Street’s success in co-opting much of the United States’ Jewish American left. Sorry to those who support J Street, but you can not have your cake and eat it too.

      Reply to Comment
    8. aristeides

      Exactly so, Yehuda. Many on the left wished for years that someone with money and clout would start up an anti-AIPAC organization to provide a locus of support for anti-occupation activity. J Street, they thought, would be that organization.

      Now, with J Street in existence, the possibility of a truly progressive locus for progessive Jews and others has been cut off at the knees. If AIPAC had created it just in order to coopt opposition, they couldn’t have done a better job.

      Reply to Comment
    9. Max, I liked most of your article. Why is supporting sanctions against Iran the same as oppossing a military attack on Iran? The underlying logic of sanctions is that we are right and if Iran does not say uncle we should attack.

      Please convince me so I can join J street.

      Reply to Comment
    10. Cortez

      “Now, with J Street in existence, the possibility of a truly progressive locus for progessive Jews and others has been cut off at the knees. If AIPAC had created it just in order to coopt opposition, they couldn’t have done a better job.”
      This is such an astute observation…J-Street is to AIPAC as Kadima is to Likud.

      Reply to Comment
    11. Daniel

      J-Street represents a part of a bigger problem – that of the American Jewish lobby groups dictating Israeli policy. Rather than another petty attempt to order our lives from the diaspora, you should work on transforming your own community to counter the efforts of the right-wing nationalist lobby, and to pose an alternative for American policymakers to identify with.

      Reply to Comment