+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

Who are the 'Welcome to Palestine' activists?

In the air between Geneva and Tel Aviv, I spent some time talking to the international activists who joined the “Welcome to Palestine” campaign. 

Activists who told this writer in the Geneva airport that they are traveling to Palestine cheered quietly and smiled as the plane took off.

However, a number of those activists declined to be interviewed. Several who had said, in the airport, that they were part of the action became skittish and recanted, claiming that they were visiting Tel Aviv or that they didn’t speak English at all.

Two men, aged 25 and 49, said that they were, indeed, headed to Bethlehem but that they were feeling “paranoid” and preferred to talk after they landed in Tel Aviv.

A majority of the activists appeared to be in their twenties.

One 19-year-old man who asked to remain anonymous said he is traveling to the West Bank to “help the Palestinian people…because they are my brothers in religion and humanity.” The young man is a French national who is the son of an Algerian Muslim father and a French mother. He is studying to be a plumber and heating technician and is active with the Boycott Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement.

When asked about critics’ claims that “Welcome to Palestine” activists don’t want Israel to exist and are attempting to delegitimize the country, he shook his head. “No, that’s not true,” he answered. “[Jews and Palestinians] can live with two countries, with two equal states.”

Ofir Gendelmen, a spokesman for the Prime Minister’s Office claimed on Twitter, however, that, “The #airflotilla2 provocation was conceived by extremist Islamic+anti-Israel organizations who object to peace&call for Israel’s destruction.”

The young activist added that he had joined the action not just because he is a Muslim but also because he feels that Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians is unjust.

When asked if he is nervous about arriving to Ben Gurion International Airport—where hundreds of Israeli police and security forces await the unarmed activists—he smiled and nodded. “Sure, I’m scared.”

Loubna Amar, a 37-year-old French national of Moroccan and Algerian descent, was hesitant to be interviewed. Only after this writer mentioned that she was employed, in the past, by Al Jazeera, did she consent.

“Okay, for you I speak English,” Amar said, smiling.

She said she had joined the “Welcome to Palestine” campaign because, “We have a right to [travel] to Palestine freely.

“[Palestinians under Israeli occupation] are like prisoners. It’s not acceptable.”

She added that “we have to show people all over the world” that Palestinians, including those in Palestinian-authority controlled Area A, live with severe restrictions imposed by the Israeli government.

Amar, a sales assistant who lives in Lyon, France, said that she feels that the “Welcome to Palestine” campaign is “good for Palestinians as well as Israelis” because an end to the occupation would mean that Israelis could “live peacefully—no more war, no more wall of shame.”

Amar is active in the BDS movement and said she believes in one state, to be shared by Jews and Palestinians alike. “Jews and Palestinians lived together before 1948. Why isn’t it possible now?”

When asked about critics’ claims that “Welcome to Palestine” activists want to see Israel blotted out of existence, Amar said, “No, not at all. [Jews] have the right to live…what’s important is the human being, not [whether they are] Palestinian or Israeli.”

Does Israel have the right to block her passage to Bethlehem? “No,” Amar answered. “We are pacifists and we want to go to [build the] school [in Bethlehem]. If there was an airport in Palestine, in the West Bank, we would go there.”

Amar showed this writer the letter she intended to present to Israeli border control. It stated that she had been” invited to participate in the building of the Palestine International School” and that she “will be hosted… in Bethlehem.”

Amar explained that she became interested in Palestine about five years ago, when she befriended a Palestinian Jordanian whose parents were from Jenin. He wasn’t politically active, but he did tell Amar about his family’s roots and she began exploring the issues on her own.

While more than half the passengers on the flight from Geneva were expected to be activists, Amar estimated that about 20 of the passengers were taking part in the action.

She acknowledged, however, that she might not know all the activists on the plane.

Many passengers said that they knew about the action but that they weren’t involved. Some passengers said they had not heard about the “Welcome to Palestine” campaign. A number of Israeli passengers seemed suspicious of the internationals and several used their cell phones to snap photos of this journalist and her interviewees.

Asked for her personal thoughts about the activists’ intention to visit Bethlehem, Tehilla Michel—a 54-year old French-Israeli social worker who lives in Jerusalem—remarked, “I don’t have a problem with it.”

Michel added, however, that she thinks that Israel has a right to decide who can enter the country. “Every country does this.”

When this writer pointed out that the activists aren’t trying to enter Israel, that they’re trying to reach Bethlehem, Michel countered that they needed to enter Israel to do so, not realizing, perhaps, that the action was meant to call attention to exactly that–that Israel ultimately controls even Area A of the West Bank.

A young Israeli man who this writer mistook for an activist said, derisively, that “thank God” he is not a part of the “Welcome to Palestine” campaign.

UPDATE: I saw the 19 and 25-year-old men I spoke with taken away by security after they presented their letters.

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article

    * Required


    1. palestinian

      The “writer” focused on “Muslim” activists.Is it iegal to take photos of people without their consent ?!

      Reply to Comment
    2. Aaron the Fascist Troll

      Just wanted to say that I think you’re doing a fine job reporting on this story. Well, as far as I can tell without knowing anything about it personally. To that commenter who said earlier that to be a real reporter you have to be unbiased or something like that, well, first of all, I think this is some relatively unbiased reporting. Second, I prefer to read stuff by reporters who don’t pretend to be unbiased. Third, I think fairness is more important than unbiasedness anyway, and this reporting seems quite fair.

      Reply to Comment
    3. Tafline Laylin

      More than one use of “this writer” in one story is unnecessary, in my opinion. It’s a silly thing to object to given the bigger issues, but that’s partially the point I hope to make: your overuse of this actually distracted me from the actual story.

      Reply to Comment
    4. max

      I presume that as is typical in such actions, the majority of the ‘soldiers’ are ingenuous – if naive – people, while the hard core ones are known without letters…
      But – as I presume again is obvious to Mrs. Guarnieri – the important question isn’t who’s coming but who’s sending.
      You may not know who’s financially behind the action, but would you at least let your readers know who paid for your ticket?

      Reply to Comment
    5. caden

      Aaron, it’s not a trivial distinction. Mya is a paid propagandist for the fly in crew. To call herself a reporter is a complete misrepresentation.

      Reply to Comment
    6. Dhalgren

      Reporting while embedded with a particular group does necessarily limit the perspective of the reporter. However, this does not equate to misrepresentation. Mya has stated the purpose of her reporting on this, and that is to describe the experiences of the “Welcome to Palestine” campaign first-hand as they occur. Your definition of propaganda is excessively broad if it includes this kind of reporting. Nowhere has she presented her opinion of the activists’ actions, for instance, or exaggerated the actions of any of the parties involved in this effort. Furthermore, a reader of this article is not directed to think in a particular way about the activists.
      As to “who’s sending,” the campaign website has a list of endorsements:

      Reply to Comment
    7. Joel

      “Jews and Palestinians lived together before 1948. Why isn’t it possible now?”

      Uhh…Jews and Palestinians didn’t get along too well before 1948.

      Reply to Comment
    8. Jack

      Before the unlimited emmigration of jewish settlers, arabs and jews lived together rather peacefully.

      Reply to Comment
    9. Jack

      And which time did I refer to?

      “Before the unlimited emmigration of jewish settlers,…”

      Reply to Comment
    10. Jack

      If you look at your own source most attacks are during late 1800 and then 1900. No matter how much you want to see conflicts between arabs and jews sustained jews and arabs lived rather peacefully together before the immigration.

      Reply to Comment
    11. Jack


      Early enough for what?

      Reply to Comment
    12. BOOZ

      @Jack :

      To support the idea that the life of the yishuv under foreign rule has never been ” a piece of cake” even in the absence of “massive ” jewish immigration.

      Quote from the Wiki notice :

      “In 1473, the authorities closed down the Nachmanides Synagogue after part of it had collapsed in a heavy rainstorm. A year later, after an appealing to Sultan Qaitbay, the Jews were given permission to repair it. The Muslims of the adjoining mosque however contested the verdict and for two days, proceeded to demolish the synagogue completely. “

      Reply to Comment
    13. Jack

      Have you recently picked up a book on this subject? Because frankly your arguments makes no sense.

      Reply to Comment
    14. BOOZ

      Oh really ?

      Considering the rest of your opus on thes threads, I don’t give a damn.

      Reply to Comment
    15. Jack

      Well your arguments makes no sense, you pick something here, pick something there and make your case without really knowing what you are refering to.

      Reply to Comment
    16. BOOZ

      Look, sevral poster including me have posted several references which destroy your mendacious assumption that “Before the unlimited emmigration of jewish settlers, arabs and jews lived together rather peacefully”

      If the only argument you oppose is calling me names… again, I don’t give a f… to whatever you can type.

      Reply to Comment
    17. Jack

      Not at all and I understand that you want to keep conflicts between arabs and jews alive.

      Reply to Comment
    18. max

      Jack, you’re a troll. You claim facts, you’re proven wrong, you ignore and continue to rant.
      You’re a bore.

      Reply to Comment
    19. PebblePump

      This is not set in stone but in my experience applies to a good majority of the “Welcome to Palestine” activist.

      U won’t find these same people in Africa, China, Iran, or Egypt.


      Reply to Comment
    20. Click here to load previous comments