+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

When the Sultan took in Jewish refugees

Bayezid II, the sultan of the Ottoman Empire, saved my family’s life during the Spanish Inquisition. The Israeli government could learn a thing or two from him.

By Tom Pessah

Sultan Bayezid II.

Sultan Bayezid II.

I am a Jew of Sephardic origin, which means the defining moment of my family’s history was their expulsion from Spain in 1492. I still have relatives who speak Ladino, the Jewish language that evolved out of medieval Spanish and was preserved in the countries the Jews arrived in. We have our own dietary customs and liturgical traditions.

For years, I only heard about the villains in this story — Ferdinand II of Aragon and Isabella I of Castile — religious zealots who expelled the Jews and Muslims who refused to convert to Christianity from the newly re-conquered Spain.

But no one ever taught me about Bayezid II, the sultan of the Ottoman Empire at the time of the expulsion. In August 1492, he sent his navy to Spain to evacuate the expelled Jews to the empire, where he granted them permission to settle and become citizens. He sent a special decree to the governors of his European provinces, ordering them to receive the Jewish refugees well. Bayezid reportedly criticized the Spanish rulers for rejecting the Jews: “You venture to call Ferdinand a wise ruler, he who has impoverished his own country and enriched mine!” The sultan even provided economic assistance to pay ransom for Jews who had been kidnapped.

Bayezid was generous toward the Jews who suffered persecution, but he also saw their potential contribution to his empire. And indeed, the resettled Jews flourished under Ottoman rule, with the much-needed skills they carried from Spain. Jews, including my family, have been the beneficiaries of this humane, far-sighted policy of accepting refugees.

It is hard not to contrast Bayezid’s policies with those of the modern State of Israel. In 1948 the majority of its Palestinian population were expelled, and the return of millions of refugees is still prevented through violence. Although Israel is a signatory of the 1951 U.N. refugee convention, the country never developed a serious, systematic policy for granting asylum to refugees.

Asylum seekers protest the Israeli government's deportation plan in front of the Rwandan embassy in Herzliya. January 22, 2018 (Keren Manor/Activestills.org)

Asylum seekers protest the Israeli government’s deportation plan in front of the Rwandan embassy in Herzliya. January 22, 2018 (Keren Manor/Activestills.org)

Today Israel is preparing to deport 40,000 refugees from Eritrea and Sudan to Rwanda and Uganda, without guaranteeing them any form of permanent status. This means they are likely to be kidnapped, enslaved, or killed upon reaching their new home. This has been the fate of many African refugees Israel expelled in the past.

Israel’s policies toward refugees have been harsher than those of the United States and most European countries, as well as those of Lebanon and Jordan. Of the 2,408 Eritreans in Israel who have requested refugee status, only four (0.16 percent) have received a positive reply. The rest were either denied or are still waiting for a response. Meanwhile, only a tiny fraction of Sudanese asylum seekers have received protection from the state. Internationally, 84 percent of Eritreans and 56 percent of Sudanese asylum seekers either received refugee status or were granted extended protection in the first half of 2014, according to the United Nations refugee agency, the UN High Commissioner for Refugees.

The moral is clear: as Jews, we could not have survived episodes like the expulsion from Spain had we been subject to policies like those of the Israeli government. We must draw on the lessons of our own history and ensure the government immediately halts its plan to deport tens of thousands of asylum seekers.

Tom Pessah is a sociologist and activist.

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article

    * Required


    1. Ben

      84/.16 = 525.

      You could call it the racist heartlessness index. Or the hypocrisy index.

      But don’t worry, I heard Michael Oren is working on a brilliant expose’ of “imaginary, unreal Eritreans.” He’s been walking around muttering about how the Eritreans “don’t have the correct Eritrean dark espresso coffee color, something’s fishy…it’s Eritreaollywood…”

      Reply to Comment
    2. Habib Saad

      The zionists expelled palestinians from their homes not talk giving asylum they forget what they went through in Spain and the asylum given to them by the Sultan.

      Reply to Comment
    3. alan

      israel is a very small densely populated country w a strong birth rate. as it’s economy continues to strengthen, it’s very possible many israelis living abroad will return. the high population growth is acknowledged to b a problem for israel. in contrast, sparsely populated sweden was the most welcoming country to migrants. it liked appearing to b humane, but, in truth, needed migrants cuz of its low birth rate. the number of migrants who were granted asylum in sweden in 2017 is a tiny fraction of what it used to b. this is happening worldwide. u just merely choose to demonize israel.

      Reply to Comment
      • Ben

        84/0.16 = 525.

        Reply to Comment
    4. Camille

      The problem with this article that it only mention the Jews that were expelled out of Spain at the end of the Arab-Andalusinian era. How can a Muslim Khalifat welcome Jews bit not Arab Muslims, and send his ship to take the Jewish refugees but not the Muslim refugees. Man ypour story doesn’t make sence to me, and as usual history always distored to your favor. Common give me a break, you’re talking about the African refugees but there is no mention to the Palsestinian refugees and their agony.

      Please do not under estimate our intelligiance.

      Reply to Comment
    5. Yaron

      I disagree.

      Reply to Comment
    6. Ben

      Yirmi Szanton of UConn, your unstated and false premise is that other empires in the benighted past did much for refugees even when it was not in their interest to do so. Your other unstated premise is that the world saw, or can expect, from Israeli culture an impulse in favor of human empathy. Where is it? Where is it in regards to the African refugees? Have you even read this magazine? Have you read the comments here by Israelis? Where was it in regards to the Yemeni children taken from their parents? Where was it in regards to the general treatment of the Mizrahim? Where was it or is it in regards to the Palestinians? Tell me, the soldiers doing what is documented here, by Breaking the Silence, does that demonstrate some heartwarming impulse of Jewish culture in favor of a human empathy that Arab culture lacks?:

      Reply to Comment