+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

When Israel's military aggression against Palestinians becomes civilian aggression

Violence against Palestinians is no longer reserved for Israeli soldiers or settlers, who still justify their actions with “security.” The young Israelis who have been attacking Palestinians, unprovoked, on the streets of Western, educated, democratic Israel, have no such excuse.

In the last week or so, the number of images of Palestinians laying in hospital beds or being carried away in coffins that has appeared in my news cycle is astonishing. It is not necessarily that there are more incidents of violence (it’s certainly plausible though I have not seen any statistical reports yet), but the media is certainly giving it more attention, and it certainly feels like there are more.

A resident of Jaffa beaten viciously by Jews by the Tel Aviv beach, a young Palestinian woman attacked while waiting for the Jerusalem light rail, a man assaulted by the Sea of Galilee, a waiter in Tel Aviv, the list goes on and on. All of these Palestinians are victims of hate crimes and racist violence committed by Jewish Israelis across Israel.

But there is also a woman in East Jerusalem, Ruba Odeh, who suffered a serious injury to her jaw after being shot by a Border Policeman on the roof of her own home in Silwan with a foam-tipped plastic bullet. Or 13-year old Mohammed al-Kurdi, wounded by IDF fire in the Aida refugee camp near Bethlehem. Or 23-year old Mohammed Asfour, who died Thursday from his wounds after being shot in the head two weeks ago during a West Bank demonstration in solidarity with the 4,593 Palestinian prisoners currently held in Israeli jails.

Asfour is the sixth Palestinian to be fatally shot by the IDF since 2013 began. From B’Tselem:

11 January 2013: Anwar al-Mamluk, 20, of a-Shuja’iyeh neighborhood, Gaza City, fatally shot by soldiers near the Gaza military perimeter fence

12 January 2013: ‘Udai Darwish, 21, of Dura, Hebron District, fatally shot by soldiers after crossing the Separation Barrier into Israel on his way to work

15 January 2013: Samir ‘Awad, 17, of the village of Budrus, Ramallah District, fatally shot by soldiers beside the Separation Barrier near Budrus

18 January 2013: Saleh al-‘Amarin, 15, of al-‘Aza Refugee Camp, Bethlehem District, fatally shot by soldiers in al-A’yda Refugee Camp

23 January 2013: Lubna al-Hanash, 21, of Bethlehem, fatally shot by soldiers near Route 60, by al-‘Arrub Refugee Camp

Where are the official condemnations? Where is the public outrage? Why hasn’t any senior government or military official come out unequivocally against what can only be deemed the normalized killing of Palestinian civilians?

Last August, I wrote about the Palestinian teenager, Jamal Julani who was brutally attacked by a mob in central Jerusalem’s Zion Square. Because of the severity of the attack and its location, the government was compelled to condemn the incident. But at the time, I pointed out that the extremely severe case should come as no surprise considering the discriminatory policies built into Israel’s legal, educational and cultural systems, and the reality of settler impunity,

Now it seems that such incidents in varying degrees are becoming commonplace. Taking the sheer volume of violent incidents against Palestinians in the last few months, it is becoming more and more impossible to distinguish between Israel’s military and civilian aggression against the Palestinian population.

This began with Israel’s military occupation in 1967, got worse after the First Intifada and the consequent brutalization process the IDF underwent, has increasingly deteriorated with the sharp rise in settler violence and the collusion between IDF and civilian settlers, and is now becoming increasingly rampant among Israeli civilians all over within Israel’s 1948 borders.

Violence against Palestinians is no longer reserved for soldiers, or for settlers, who still justify their actions with “security.” The young civilians who have been attacking Palestinians, unprovoked, on the streets of Western, educated, democratic Israel, have no such excuse.

So is it possible that there is less and less difference between Israeli military aggression against Palestinian civilians and Israeli civilian aggression against Palestinian civilians? To me, they are just becoming one big blurry mess of bloodshed deeply rooted in the Israeli ideology that Jews and Arabs are inherent enemies, and only one can prevail.

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article

    * Required


    1. Joe

      Not only impossible to distinguish, the one actively leads to the other.

      If this were not true, the military would protect the Palestinians as the settlers and/or we’d see more civilians standing against their own compatriots to protect Palestinians.

      Reply to Comment
    2. Benjamin

      Democratic Israel? Lol is that a joke?

      Reply to Comment
    3. I keep quoting this on 972:

      “Our Government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its example. Crime is contagious. If the Government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy.”

      Associate Justice Louis D. Brandeis, dissenting
      Olmstead v US (1928), 277 U.S. 438

      What is happening, as you note, is that race war ideology is enabling action under perceived immunity. Every justice denied augments that immunity. Lynchings in the 1900-50 Jim Crow South were not frequent, but they didn’t have to be. Knowing such impunity existed enabled much other violence.

      Brandeis was a Zionist. He visited proto-Israel.

      Reply to Comment
    4. rsgengland

      The two Palestinian ‘past their sell by date’ administrations should hold new elections.
      Then the democratically elected leaders of the Palestinians, and the democratically elected government of Israel can sit down to discuss peace.
      First they can all state what they want.
      Next they can all explain why they have rejected the other sides demands, and explain their reasons for rejection.
      Then the proper peace talks can begin, as all the positions will be known.
      Then when there is peace, we can all live in utopia, and the violence will stop.
      Until then, when Palestinians come near security fences or challenge Israeli soldiers, there will be injuries or worse.

      Reply to Comment
      • From the peice: “A resident of Jaffa beaten viciously by Jews by the Tel Aviv beach, a young Palestinian woman attacked while waiting for the Jerusalem light rail, a man assaulted by the Sea of Galilee, a waiter in Tel Aviv, the list goes on and on. All of these Palestinians are victims of hate crimes and racist violence committed by Jewish Israelis across Israel.”

        Within Israel–not the outer ever war. I again redirect you to Olmstead v US, above.

        Reply to Comment
    5. Piotr Berman

      But why do you not appreciate the fact that Israel just had free elections 🙁 And they also helped when there was an earthquake in Haiti!

      Reply to Comment
    6. Noevil9

      Israel and Israelis are nothing but a continuation of the Zionist movement dream to establish a home land for the Jews, in a land that is inhabited by others, The palestinians. What did the first Zionist use to achieve such a task? They killed what they killed, they massacred two or three villages inhabitants. They bulldozed about 500 villages and towns of the palestinians, and they expelled as many, as they were able to expelled,about 700,000 or so.
      You tell me, what have had changed then 65 years ago? I tell you; The packaging ! Just the packaging, to suit the hasbara image that Israel develops with time, to feed the masses, and the world of the Goys, the image that Israel thinks the (others) want to hear and see. There is no doubt that there are good israeli people who wish for peace, as your self and the rest of the Magazine’s group, and few of my friends. I know they exist. But the rest, as Greg Pollack correctly stated in the comments quoting L. Brandies, are the torch of Zionism carried , masked every now and then to quit people of conscious. The deeds are just the same as its evident by the facts on the ground, and as history will end up writing them. Something is terribly wrong with where is this going for the Palestinians and the Israelis, and I would not be surprised if it went for all the Jews as well.

      Reply to Comment
    7. Ella Austine

      It is our hope that the baseless and incessant killing going on between Israel and Palestine will be resolved peacefully as quickly as possible.

      Reply to Comment