+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

What Abbas should have told the United Nations

What if the Abbas had announced this was his last UN speech as Israel’s security contractor? A reimagined version of the speech that wasn’t. (Read or watch Abbas’s actual speech.)

By Rida Abu Rass

Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas address the general debate of the UN General Assembly’s 70th session, September 20, 2015. (UN Photo/Cia Pak)

Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas address the general debate of the UN General Assembly’s 70th session, September 20, 2015. (UN Photo/Cia Pak)

H.E. Mr. Mogens Lykketoft, President of the General Assembly,
H.E. Mr Ban Ki Moon, Secretary General of the United Nations,
Excellencies, heads of delegations,
Ladies and gentlemen,

I come before you today from Palestine to sound the alarm about what is happening in Jerusalem, about what is happening in the West Bank and Gaza and about what is happening in Israel. I come before you to sound the alarm about what has been happening to Palestinians for 67 years, in our own homeland.

We are often accused of refusing. Of refusing to negotiate, of refusing to settle, of refusing to compromise. In 1948, we were a naive, agrarian, developing people. 100 years after the spring of nations — that glorified winter of failed revolutions that gave rise to nationalism in Europe — we still knew nothing of nationalism and self determination. In 1948, when the Jewish people declared the establishment of the state of Israel in Mandatory Palestine, partition was out of the question for us. In the eyes of our forefathers, there was not a single doubt that this land belonged to us, for we have been living in it and nourishing it for longer than we can remember. We had no other land.

But we no longer refuse. For over 20 years, we have done nothing but reach out our hands for peace.

Ladies and gentlemen,

I remind you that history was not kind to us. Jewish militants, determined to create a state for themselves, ethnically cleansed us from our land in 1948. Those Palestinians that remained in Israel suffer from systematic discrimination every day. The Gaza Strip and the West Bank have been under one occupation or another for 67 years. Our brothers and sisters in Lebanon and Syria, third generation refugees, are drowning in the Mediterranean Sea.

Ladies and gentlemen,

We have had enough. We Palestinians understand the Jewish people’s unparalleled trauma. We realize the Jewish need for a safe homeland. But must their safety come at our expense?

Contrary to Netanyahu’s false accusations, we have continuously recognized Israel’s right to exist peacefully in its internationally recognized borders for over 20 years — despite the fact that those borders were drawn to include many of our home towns, and our own people. We wanted nothing more than a state within the 1967 borders, and indeed, the Oslo Accords brought a true hope for permanent peace in the region. But in recent years, Netanyahu derailed any attempt to negotiate, time and time again, despite the fact that we Palestinians expressed our willingness to make enormous compromises. The absurdity of negotiating with your own occupier became unbearably obvious for us Palestinians, as Israel continues its comfortable refusal to commit to a two-state solution.

Ladies and gentlemen,

I come before you today for the last time. As you know, our struggle has been focused on you, the international community in recent years. We thought you could help us, and I hope you still can. But what is clear to me and to the Palestinian people is that the Palestinian National Authority can no longer exist as Israel’s contractor in the West Bank. We refuse to continue playing the role of Israel’s riot police. Half a state is not a state at all.

Mr. President,

I thank you and the international community for giving us the status of permanent observer state. But we are not a state. We are treated as guests in our homes. Prisoners in our own land. I thank you for raising the Palestinian flag in New York. But what we urgently need is multilateral, international political action, not symbolic gestures of good will. Yet the Palestinian people are still in grave need of your assistance. I thank all of you that supported our bid for statehood, and I call upon you to accelerate your efforts in changing the status quo in Israel and Palestine.

Time and again, my hands as president of the Palestinian National Authority have proven to be tied.

Ladies and Gentlemen, Your Excellencies, Mr. Netanyahu,

I can no longer bear the enormous responsibility of speaking for a voiceless people, for you have rendered me mute. I hereby announce the dismantlement of the Palestinian National Authority, in order to reflect the reality on the ground: 6 million Palestinians between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean are systematically discriminated against, and they are voiceless.

We are not a state. We are not an authority. We are an occupied people with occupied territories. In dismantling the PA, the onus of this total occupation reverts to the Israeli government, the occupying power. We did our best to accommodate the Israeli need for a state alongside us, but the geopolitical reality that Israel created renders this solution impossible.

On behalf of all Palestinians, I declare that our hands are still outstretched to designing a peaceful solution for the region, but this time, as equal partners in our shared homeland.

Rida Abu Rass is a Palestinian citizen of Israel from Jaffa currently completing a graduate degree at Brandeis University in Boston.


Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article

    * Required


    1. Mark

      “6 million Palestinians between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean are …… voiceless.

      Whose fault is that? In the real world the voice of the people is heard in periodic elections. the voice of the sole representative of the Palestinian people is not very convincing in my eyes.

      Reply to Comment
      • Gustav

        I have one word to say about this BS about outstretched hand in peace…


        Reply to Comment
          • Gustav

            Yeah Right! O-S-L-O!!!

            I was all for it at the time. Pity it turned sour very quickly. Why? One word again…


            He did not really want a peace deal with Israel that’s why he played a double game. He tried to get as much as he could, using Oslo and give as little as possible in return. One thing he did give us though. An escalation in terrorism. The ink hardly dried on the signed accords and terrorism against us escalated instead of diminishing. That is why Baruch Goldstein lost his head and went berserk. He was a doctor and he treated so many victims of Arab terrorism that he swore and carried out vengeance. Of course he was wrong to do what he did but he was a symptom rather than a cause of what happened to Oslo.

            And one more thing. Contrary to pro Arab propagandists such as Benny, Oslo was never about withdrawing drom 100% of the West Bank. It’s agenda was based on UN SC Resolution 242 which required Israel to withdraw to SECURE AND RECOGNIZED BORDERS. The 1967 boundary lines which were nothing but the 1949 armistice lines certainly did not qualify as secure borders.

            Reply to Comment
          • Jason Kidd

            Ben just made the argument that there is nobody to talk to.
            He’s actually right this time.

            Reply to Comment