+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

Weeks after prisoner strike ends, Israel not holding up its end of deal

New report by Israeli and Palestinian human rights NGOs shows that Israel is not meeting the conditions to which it agreed in a deal to end a massive hunger strike almost two months ago. Three Palestinians are still on strike, one in mortal danger.

Nakba Day protest near Ofer Military Prison, May 15 2012 (photo: Activestills.org)

Fed with lies? Almost eight weeks have passed since some 1,550 Palestinian prisoners ended their collective hunger strike in exchange for a series of steps to better their conditions, promised by Israel. Yet a new report recently published by Physicians for Human Rights, Al-Haq, Adalah, Addameer and other NGOs shows that the state has neglected to fulfill several of the more significant promises it made.

The prisoners’ hunger strike, which started on Palestinian Prisoners’ Day, was aimed at challenging steps taken by Israel in 2011 against the prisoners in order to promote the release of Gilad Schalit. While Schalit was released in a prisoner swap, conditions in Israeli prisons remained the same, leading to the prisoners’ struggle. The strike was also about demonstrating solidarity with several administrative detainees who have been on strike for longer periods, demanding to put an end to Israel’s use of draconic detentions without trial or charge. The deal reached on May 15 between the state and the leaders of the strike was supposed to begin a process whereby inmates regained their rights – but only few steps were actually taken by Israel in that direction since.

An end to solitary confinement, no change in conditions

According to the NGOs’ report, the Israel Prison Service held up its end of the deal by releasing 18 political leaders from solitary confinement, where some had been held for years simply for being recognized as leaders, and allowing them back into the common cells. Only Dirar Abu-Sisi, kidnapped by Israel in Ukraine, remains isolated, as are several inmates who have been sentenced to solitary confinement due to their behavior in prison, who were not included in the deal.

However, other parts of the deal were not fulfilled to the same extent. One of the most important of these was the demand to reinstate family visitations from the Gaza Strip, which was sealed off in 2007. According to the report, visitations were supposed to resume within a month, but inmates have still not seen any of their loved ones. A similar problem affects several prisoners from the West Bank whose families are barred from entering Israel– another problem not yet solved by authorities. IPS spokesperson has said in response that the coordination of family visitations is a complex process, involving the army, Shin Bet, police and the ICRC, and that a joint committee is due to finish its work on the matter shortly. A source in the IPS also told +972 that the committee’s work was delayed due to the recent escalation on the Israel-Gaza border.

Demonstration in support of prisoners, Nablus (Ahmad Al-Bazz / Activestills)

Demonstration in support of prisoners, Nablus (Ahmad Al-Bazz / Activestills)

Other reasons for the strike included the prevention of higher education within prisons for Palestinian inmates only, periodic violent searches, and a lack of sufficient health care. The IPS denies that resuming access to the Open University courses was part of the deal, and states that the policy is not about to change. A petition by inmates on the matter is pending in the High Court of Justice.

Still held without trial or charge

A significant part of the report deals with the issue of administrative detainees. The NGOs strongly condemn the continued detention of Hassan Safadi, who was on strike for 71 days, promised a release on June 29, and is now once again refusing food due to a new detention warrant issued against him. Safadi has been in prison since June 30 2011, and had his detention prolonged twice with the broad accusation of his being “a threat to regional security” – a decision approved by the High Court. He is now on the 14th day of a renewed hunger strike.

Meanwhile, administrative detainee Thaer Halahleh has been released as promised, after 77 days of hunger strike, and four other veteran hunger strikers are expected to be released within two months, including Palestinian National Football Team midfielder Mahmoud Sarsak, who was on strike for more than 90 days. The four are hoping that Israel keeps its word and doesn’t prolong their detention orders further, at least not without any charges or a proper trial.

The NGOs also warn that Israel does not seem to have reconsidered its policy of extensive administrative detentions – also not in accordance with promises made within the deal. The NGOs recommend EU intervention to end the draconic policy.

Demonstration in Nablus in solidarity with hunger strikers, yesterday (Ahmad Al-Bazz / Activestills)

Demonstration in Nablus in solidarity with hunger strikers, yesterday (Ahmad Al-Bazz / Activestills)

PHR also mentions that three Palestinians are still on hunger strike in prison to this day. Akram Rikhawi is now on his 86th day of hunger strike, and doctors fear for his life. Rikhawi was arrested in 2004, sentenced to nine years (for charges not mentioned by PHR, or found online), and is now protesting against an IPS committee’s decision not to cut a year off his sentence, due to his chronic asthma, diabetes and osteoperosis.

Two other inmates on strike are Safadi and Sammer Al-Burq, an administrative detainee now on his 46th day of hunger strike. The IPS says the three are being taken care of in the medical ward, and on occasion transferred for treatment in civilian hospitals. PHR calls upon the IPS to transfer the three to a civilian hospital until they end their strike.

Read also:

Palestinian Prisoners’ Day: Hundreds join hunger strike

UPDATE: Prisoners agree to end hunger strike

Deal reached to free hunger striking athlete Mahmoud Sarsak

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article
  • LEAVE A COMMENT

    * Required

    COMMENTS

    1. Prometheus

      Palestinians never ever in the history of Mankind has held their end of the deal.
      Never means never. Not even once.
      So why anyone who deals with them should behave differently?

      Reply to Comment
    2. Jack

      Thats the classic tactic by Israel government,
      The topic gets alot of news, Israel is silent in the beginning but it gets too intense. Israel finally respond and say the prisoners will get better conditions. The world is happy, so are news so are Israel because now attention wont be on Israel anymore. BUT. They backed down from its promise. This is the classic tactic that is always used. They simply cant be trusted.

      Reply to Comment
    3. Kolumn9

      They should all go back on hunger strike and this time refuse any and all deals.

      Reply to Comment
    4. The Israeli security apparatus is not monolithic. Public agreements do not end contention within the apparatus. Failure of promise can be evidence of that contention.
      .
      On a side note, reflecting on the comments of Prometheus and K9, above: In the US, police used to be able to fire at people running from them. The US Supreme Court ruled, 7-2, that such wounding or killing violated due process (a rather newly appointed Sandra Day O’Conner voted no; she shifted her jurisprudence later). Prome. and K9 make every him a them. Everything is racially, categorically, clear. They seem unable to conceive of State error, or deliberate injustice. Perhaps that High Court peition about the Open University will go nowhere. But, if the pleas keep coming, someday I think they will go somewhere. You see, I reallly do think Prome. and K9 will ultimately fail.

      Reply to Comment
    5. Rafael

      Anyone expected anything different from this country of rogues and cheats? Palestinians were naive in believing non-violent activism is going to take them somewhere. Since when Israel follows deals? Force is the only thing Israel understands.

      Reply to Comment
    6. Prometheus

      @Greg – You have a very easy way to prove me wrong – just find 1 (one) case where the Palestinians kept to their end.

      After you will ultimately fail, start thinking again.

      Reply to Comment
    7. Jack

      Prometheus,
      You got the burden of proof so please tell us when Palestinians have kept violated deals?

      But just for the sake of argument, the deal 2008 in which Israel and Hamas accepted a ceasefire, where held by Hamas but violated by Israel.

      Reply to Comment
    8. Haggai Matar

      @Prometheus – your question is fairly easy to answer. Here’s one: According to one deal, palestinian prisoners were to end their mass hunger strike, and Israel was to change certain aspects of prison life. The Palestinians kept their side of the deal, and the strike ended. As shown above – Israel did not. Good enough?

      Reply to Comment
    9. un2here

      @Prometheus – Your level of provocative dishonesty is astonishing?!? In one word: Schalit! It’s even in the damned article …

      Reply to Comment
    10. Prometheus

      Oh, my bad.
      Should have added “whenever they have had a choice”
      Not that I’m saying that the State of Israel ever kept to it’s end of the deal whenever could afford not to.

      Reply to Comment
    11. Kolumn9

      @Greg, I only wanted to wish them the best of luck in their freely chosen endeavor.
      .

      I am perfectly capable of conceiving state error or deliberate injustice but I care more about my bus not blowing up. If Israel has a policy that has it hold an innocent man because it means also holding someone that might blow up a bus, I accept this policy with open eyes and an only mildly weighted heart. No system is perfect and it is better in my opinion to err on the side of caution when it comes to defending the lives of your citizens than on the side of liberty for non-citizens.

      Reply to Comment