+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

Trump is reaching into Netanyahu’s election playbook

From race baiting to fear mongering to warning of liberal media conspiracies against him, the Republican presidential candidate is doing exactly what Netanyahu did to get re-elected. But the Israeli prime minister had something Trump doesn’t.

Donald Trump poses for a photo with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in New York, September 25, 2016. (Kobi Gideon / GPO)

Donald Trump poses for a photo with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in New York, September 25, 2016. (Kobi Gideon / GPO)

There is a lot about Donald Trump’s presidential campaign that is worryingly reminiscent of Benjamin Netanyahu’s electoral antics, particularly his willingness to say just about anything, regardless of the consequences as long as he thinks it might be politically expedient. Beyond style and personality, however, the tactical similarities in their respective campaigns’ final stretches are even more disturbing.

In particular, Trump’s recent, wildly unspecified warnings of voter fraud in inner-cities closely mimic Netanyahu’s election-day warning that Arab voters were being bussed to the polls in droves. Both warnings were designed to increase turnout among white — or in Israel’s case, Jewish — conservative voters by stoking fears that minorities are attempting to influence the democratic process by voting.

Such warnings play off the fears and resentments of both men’s core voters — the idea that their kind, the traditional face of their respective nations, might lose demographic majorities, and subsequently, political power. In Israel that fear, which most Jews do not consider racist to discuss, is known as “the demographic threat” — that Israel will no longer be able to justify its Jewishness democratically if non-Jews become a majority in its democracy (or even among those it rules undemocratically). In the United States these days, such fears are generally only expressed outside the home by white supremacists, but Trump seems to believe that with this type of rhetoric, he can evoke latent and even sub-conscious racism in mainstream white voters.

Another tactic Donald Trump has been trying out is warning, as a statement of fact, that ISIS will take over the United States if his opponent is elected. Benjamin Netanyahu made almost identical claims in the days and weeks before the Israeli elections last year, publishing television advertisements that quite literally showed ISIS fighters driving toward Jerusalem, and declaring: “The Left will surrender to terrorism. It’s us or them.” The message was that a victory for his opponents meant an invasion by ISIS.

A third (although not the last) tactic that Trump is borrowing from Netanyahu’s playbook is his numerous declarations that there is a widespread liberal media conspiracy to elect his opponent. Just three days before the elections in Israel last year, Netanyahu made an almost identical declaration: “Left-wing and media elements in Israel and abroad have conspired to bring [Zionist Union leaders Isaac Herzog and Tzipi Livni] to power illegitimately, by means of slander at home and unprecedented money from abroad.”

All three tactics are textbook examples of fear mongering, and be warned: it worked for Netanyahu. The prime minister, who is not that popular of a politician in Israel, was behind in many polls leading up to election day primarily because he was losing votes to smaller right-wing parties. By successfully convincing those voters that a ballot cast for any right-wing party other than his own would guarantee a victory for the Arabs/ISIS/Hamas/left-wing media conspiracy/nefarious foreign powers/Isaac Herzog, he was ultimately able to convince enough voters to cast a vote for him, albeit apprehensively.

These are strong parallels for the Trump campaign to draw on, particularly as the Republican candidate has been hemorrhaging not insignificant numbers of conservative voters to Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson. But that doesn’t mean what worked for Netanyahu will necessarily work for Trump.

Netanyahu had something that Trump doesn’t, a factor that lent just enough credence to his fear mongering and conspiratorial race baiting to make them effective: years of experience as prime minister and a (questionable) track record of keeping Israelis safe. Making things even easier, Netanyahu’s equally unpopular opponent had no prime ministerial experience or security credentials.

In other words, for just enough Israeli voters, Netanyahu was the safe bet. In the United States, Donald Trump is the wild card.

Perhaps the most important difference, however, is that in Israel’s parliamentary system, Netanyahu’s Likud party only had to win 23 percent of the vote to win the election.

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article

    * Required


    1. Average American

      Ari – “Not empty hate mongering and racism but prudent thinking.” We’ve seen USA attacked by Israel numerous times. Israel’s leader verbally attacks our president and our values, Israel sympathizers infiltrate our congress and seek to turn it to their own objectives, Jewish investment banks attack our economy by bribing or forcing laws to be made in their favor and that’s what brought our latest financial crisis, Jewish newspapers attack whoever doesn’t tow their line, Jews give us false intelligence about Iraq WMD, Jews stifle our workers by excluding non-Jews in hiring, and Jews flaunt these things in our face. So we (non-Jews) observe this and think cautiously and prudently about Jews. These things by the way are exactly what the Germans experienced, and they began thinking cautiously and prudently about Jews.

      Reply to Comment