+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

Trump is no more racist than mainstream Israeli policy

Israeli politicians are joining the global pushback against Donald Trump’s anti-Muslim racism. But guess what other country bans Muslim immigration?

File photo of Donald Trump (Albert H. Teich / Shutterstock.com)

File photo of Donald Trump (Albert H. Teich / Shutterstock.com)

Just days after Republican presidential hopeful Donald Trump announced that he will be visiting Israel by the end of December, the billionaire populist called for a “total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States.” Everyone is aghast, including several Israeli politicians, figures and organizations, who began expressing their disgust and indignation Wednesday morning. Some went as far as demanding that Trump be blocked from entering Israel’s parliament, the Knesset, or to bar him from entering the country entirely.

The organization Republicans Abroad Israel was quick to condemn Trump’s statement, calling it “diametrically opposed to everything American stands for.”

Labor MK Omer Bar-Lev tweeted Wednesday morning that Trump is racist and should not be welcomed into the Knesset. Anti-settlement activist and scholar Gershom Goremberg tweeted that the appropriate Israeli response would be to ban Trump from the country.

Joint List MK Ahmed Tibi called Trump a neo-Nazi on Twitter who should not be allowed into Israel’s parliament, but noted that “the things he said are not unfamiliar to some of those here who serve in the Knesset.”

That might be the understatement of the year.

Racism — and various forms of discrimination against Muslims, Arabs, and Palestinians — is just as rampant here in Israel as it is inside the Trump camp, if not more so. Except in Israel, racism and ethno-religious discrimination is not only accepted rhetoric in the halls of power and the sidewalk cafes of Tel Aviv, it is also long-standing formal state policy.

Trump called to ban Muslims from entering the United States. In Israel, there is already a law banning Muslims from immigrating — the “Law of Return” which gives that right to Jews alone. Even those who were born here but fled, or whose families lived here for generations upon generations, are forbidden from returning.

The Anti-Defamation League on Monday called Trump’s plan to “bar people from entry to the United States based on their religion” is “deeply offensive and runs contrary to our nation’s deepest values.” Has the ADL ever spoken out against Israel’s Jewish-only immigration law and discriminatory border control policies?

Inherent institutional racism can also be seen in the two separate-and-unequal legal systems for Palestinians and Israelis living meters from one another in the occupied West Bank. It can be seen the total negligence of infrastructure, resources and education for Palestinians in annexed East Jerusalem as opposed to Jewish neighborhoods in the same territory. It can be seen in the rampant and deep-seeded discrimination against Palestinian citizens of Israel when it comes to housing, land confiscation and re-distribution, education and employment. And these are just the most obvious examples.

If we follow the logic of demanding that Donald Trump be barred from entering Israel’s Knesset, then so too should a large number of elected officials serving in that Knesset.

There is Education Minister Naftali Bennett who has bragged about killing Arabs and suggested that Jews are more evolutionarily advanced than Arabs. There is Likud MK Yaron Mazuz, who told Arab members of Knesset they should be grateful for even being allowed to serve as elected officials, that “We’re doing you a favor by letting you sit here.” There is Prime Minister Netanyahu, of course, who complained that Palestinian citizens of Israel were exercising their right to vote — “in droves.” There was the sitting foreign minister, Avigdor Liberman, who advocated population transfer.

And that’s just the right-wing camp.

The “Zionist Union,” a joint slate comprised of Labor and Tzipi Livni, voted to disqualify Arab MK Haneen Zoabi from the Knesset. The side of the Israeli politics formerly known as the Left also has no problem with acceptance committees designed to keep Arabs out of Jewish communities or the idea of segregated communities, or segregated schools. They have no problem with the ban on Palestinian citizens of Israel living with or conferring residency to their spouses from the West Bank or Gaza. Oh yeah, and of course, there’s the Jewish-only settlements and dual legal systems in the West Bank, which came into existence under “left-wing” governments and have never even been questioned by any subsequent government.

Israelis who want to ban Trump, who call him racist, need to take a good look in the mirror. And just imagine for a second what would happen if the American Jewish establishment — Democrats, Republicans, communal institutions, elected officials — treated racist policies in Israel with the same uniform rejection and disgust as they are starting to direct at Trump’s abhorrently racist rhetoric.

Newsletter banner

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article
  • LEAVE A COMMENT

    * Required

    COMMENTS

    1. NL

      Unlike America, the State of Israel wasn’t founded on the principle of religious freedom for all. It was founded as the return of the Jewish people to their original homeland, a place to guard against their persecution. Big, big difference!

      Reply to Comment
      • David

        NL

        “[T]he State of Israel.” Israel is neither a “state” nor a country, i.e., it has yet to formally declare its borders and have them accepted as such by the international community.

        “[Israel] was founded as the return of the Jewish people to their original homeland…” Are you serious? The United Kingdom of Israel lasted a mere 78 years, and never included the coastal plain from Jaffa to Gaza. Nor is there any archaeological evidence or more importantly, writings of contemporaneous civilizations, that prove David or Solomon ever existed or that the so-called “Exodus” from Egypt ever took place. The list of nonsense and misrepresentations of documented history is endless to justify the foreign Zionists’ dispossession and expulsion of Palestine’s indigenous Arab Palestinians, descendants of the Canaanites.

        The Egyptians ruled the region between the River and the Sea for 615 intermittent years, including the era of the Muslim Mamelukes; and the Romans ruled the region for 677 continuous years.

        Palestine was also ruled for several centuries by two other peoples: the Arabs (Muslims), for 447 continuous years (638-1085) and the Ottoman Turks (Muslims), for 401 uninterrupted years (1517-1918). In short, Jewish/Hebrew rule over the region was less than a blip.

        To quote the renowned historian/anthropologist and “Holy Land” specialist, Professor Ilene Beatty: “When we speak of ‘Palestinians’ or of the ‘Arab population [of Palestine]’, we must bear in mind their Canaanite origin. This is important because their legal right to the country stems…from the fact that the Canaanites were first, which gives them priority; their descendants have continued to live there, which gives them continuity; and (except for the 800,000 dispossessed refugees [of 1948 along with the further hundreds of thousands expelled before and after the war Israel launched on 5 June 1967]) they are still living there, which gives them present possession. Thus we see that on purely statistical grounds they have a proven legal right to their own land.” (“Arab and Jew in the Land of Canaan,” 1957)

        Reply to Comment
        • Merkava

          Actually, BEN/NL/David/Weiss/Eliza/Brian/Bryan/etc. are one and the same lunatic. He is a typical example of the kind of lunatics whose lives revolve around Jews and Israel that this site attracts. Go take your meds, freaking moron.

          Reply to Comment
    2. Weiss

      The Apple does not fall far from the tree…

      Reply to Comment
    3. Eliza

      Well, at least there will be some truth in the oft quoted line regarding Israel and America and shared values. Trump still maintains sizable support amongst American Republicans – and Trump and his ilk would be very much at home in the Jewish State.

      Another great article by Zonszein.

      Reply to Comment