+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

The myth of the wasted Israeli vote - and the alternative

As Israeli elections approach, are you considering voting for a party you don’t really like, merely to prevent Bibi-Lieberman from winning? Here is a piece from a friend active with the Da’am Workers Party on the importance of voting not just for the lesser evil, but for a party that offers a real alternative to exclusive nationalism and unbridled capitalism.

By Yonatan Preminger

By tactical voting to block the worst candidate, Israel’s left wing perpetuates the status quo. In order to enter the Knesset, a political party must garner a minimum percentage of votes (currently 2%), but our reluctance to support parties which are unlikely to pass this “electoral threshold” plays into the hands of the large parties who have amply demonstrated their inability to bring about peace and equality. Real change requires that we vote according to principle. This means supporting those who struggle for an alternative to exclusive nationalism and unbridled capitalism – no matter how small their party appears to be.

Why vote at all?

The Knesset is rife with corruption. Access to Knesset members is not equal to all citizens. Through its laws and norms, the Knesset is designed to maintain the privileged status of one group of people over all others. It is certainly not a perfect political structure. However, it is the only democratic framework Israel has, and those seeking change cannot afford to ignore it. Furthermore, it is sufficiently open and flexible to allow real change – if only enough people were to want it.

But real change comes slowly. It requires incremental transformations of political and cultural norms. It requires the patient development of an alternative, with its own values and norms, to extend an invitation to those who wish to take part in creating a different society. It requires the sure-footed establishment of principles that challenge the status quo. Real change will not come through tactical voting for the “best of a bad bunch.”

For 45 years the occupation has been going strong. Despite protests against it ranging from unarmed to the violent, despite various negligible victories – a detainee released here, a patient granted treatment in an Israeli hospital there, a family permitted to harvest their olives in a “closed military zone,” the separation wall moved by a few dozen meters – the general direction of Israel’s settlement project in the territories has not changed. And it has led to continued land expropriation, continued violation of human rights, continued denial of basic amenities, continued arrests and detention without trial and continued killing.

The occupation is Israel’s most pressing issue, yet it cannot be disconnected from a range of other issues which cry out for attention: increasing socioeconomic disparities; indirect subsidies for the wealthy; the retrenchment of welfare services; the reduction of universal education; the violation of the rights of migrant workers and refugees.; discrimination against Israel’s Palestinian citizens, etc. The list is long.

The three main parties (Likud-Yisrael Beiteinu, Kadima, Labor) are all partners in the settlement project. Most of the smaller parties that have sat in government coalitions did nothing to halt the occupation. The vast majority of Israel’s prominent politicians are implicated in this project. Moreover, all three major parties accept the economic structure of capitalism, despite populist declarations of support for the social protest movement: the parties’ records speak for themselves. Politicians switch parties according to narrow political considerations, regardless of agenda or principles. The former leader of the Labor Party is one of Israel’s richest citizens.

The status quo in Israel rests on two sturdy pillars: capitalism and the “inalienable” right of one group of people (Jews) to claim most-favored status above all others. From the point of view of those seeking real change, a wasted vote is a vote for a party which accepts either one, or both, of these two pillars. Voting for a party which rejects the twin pillars of Israeli society and works to build an alternative society is therefore not a waste of a vote: it is a principled vote that rejects political “quick fixes” and expresses confidence in this alternative, no matter how long the road.

Why vote the Da’am Workers Party?

The Da’am Workers Party (DWP), led by Asma Agbarieh-Zahalka (with Nir Nader second on the list), offers such an alternative. Since it was registered as a political party in 1995, it has consistently maintained an unequivocal agenda based on the principles of democracy and equality. Long before the social protest movement arose in Israel, it advocated integration and social justice which honors human welfare above profit. It rejects a dichotomous worldview of Jews on one side and Arabs on the other, and strives towards creating an open society in partnership with all those who wish to take part.

The DWP is not merely a vehicle for career politicians. Whether elections are approaching or not, members of the DWP work every day to realize the vision that drives the party and inspires the various organizations which share the party’s aspirations. These are not empty words: this vision is manifested in the activities of the various organizations; it is reflected in the party’s press releases, articles and the affiliated Challenge magazine, published in three languages; it can be seen in the lives of its members and the way they choose to act politically and socially.

We warn against the temptation to vote for one large party merely to prevent the victory of another: Those who vote for the “lesser evil” must not be surprised when evil continues to exist. We also reject calls for casting blank ballots. This is a legitimate form of protest against rigged elections or when none of the parties represents the voter’s worldview, but amounts to a wasted vote when there is a party whose principles you share.

In voting for the DWP, you are expressing confidence in an alternative, and helping others to remain firm in their desire for an alternative. Your vote is a voice of support that assists us in our daily work. We need to know that you are with us. The Knesset is an important channel, but there are others. With the support of your vote, the DWP will continue to act through every available channel to create an Israel of cooperation, equality, peace and true democracy.

Yonatan Preminger is a doctoral student in Sociology at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev and he is an active member of the Da’am Workers Party.

Editor’s note: This article represent the opinion of the author alone and is presented here as part of our elections coverage. +972 Magazine doesn’t endorse or support any party or candidate. 

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article

    * Required


    1. The Trespasser

      Wow. These fellas in BGU are outdated and uneducated.

      I really find it hard to believe that until today there is followers of that failed religion – Communism.

      p.s. there is no known examples of Communist Democratic countries.

      Reply to Comment
    2. BOOZ

      I doubt very much that the concerns listed hereabove come in the top priorities of the Israeli voters. I would rather cite the housing, health insurance, employment issues…together with the encroaching of minority ultra-orthodox parties on public life.

      As far as “useful” vote is concerned…I am sorry to confirm my Israeli friends that, as long as they will have a proportional system (where the country is a sole constituency and seats in the Knesset are distributed in proportion to the ballots) they will remit the destiny of their nation into the hands of party apparatchiks and allow any behind the curtains “combinazioni”.
      Here in France, your system is cited in 1st year of Law school as the epitome of unefficiency , as was ours during the 3rd and 4th Republics.

      Just give a try to constituency vote where the successful candidate is democracy-proven by having talked to a maximum of citizens or even by having been proved fit the job by having fulfilled an elective mandate such as local councillor our mayir.

      Reply to Comment
    3. BOOZ

      Oups, typo :

      I should have typed

      Just give a try to constituency vote where the successful candidate is democracy-proven by having talked to a maximum of citizens or even by having been proved fit to the job by having fulfilled an elective mandate such as local councillor or mayor.

      Reply to Comment
    4. XYZ

      Have to agree with Trespasser regarding the odd equating of Socialism with Democracy. I came to Israel in 1986 when the Histradrut-Hevrat Ovdim system was breaking down, but I saw what happens when “the workers”, through their supposed “representatives” ran things. This lead to a situation where in a “worker’s-run company” under the Histradrut had the situation where a worker who had a problem with his boss would go to his union represenative, who was …… HIS BOSS. After all, the “workers” ran the company, through their “representatives”. In reality this was very undemocratic.
      In Israel, under the MAPAI-MAPAI-Histradrut essentially one-party state, the slogan was “In Israel, the workers rule” which meant that the MAPAI-MAPAM-Histadrut system rule and they were essentially an unelected elite which was more disconnected from the average worker than any capitalist was.
      I heard from someone who came from Communist Romania that the slogan was “under our socialist system, the workers drink champaign every day……through their ‘representatives’ in the party”. I can’t believe anyone in Israel wants to return to that suffocating, corrupt system. I am sure that Yonanat will tell us that when HE runs things, it will be more democratic this time, but human nature being what it is , it is INEVITABLE that a socialist will end up corrupt and unrepresentative. The Israeli citizen is too intelligent to return to that system.

      Reply to Comment
      • The Trespasser

        The problem is that although capitalism is inherently bad, socialism is even worse.

        Full ‘social’ like in EU can’t be much lower than minimal wages, which causes lowest earning workers to prefer not to work if they can which makes foreign workers necessary and causes draft of large sums from country’s economy.

        The very few successful examples of Socialist Capitalism is Germany – Arbeit, Disziplin und Ordnung, you know; Japan with On and Giri and probably UK with their liberal self-employment system and other laws – world’s oldest working democracy, after all, a lot of time for improvement.
        However it is not the case for countries like pre-Likud Israel, Greece and Spain which are shining examples of ass-licking promotion system.

        Capitalism is a harsh necessity. People have to be worried about their own (other’s to but to a lesser extent) future to be motivated to work hard, set and achieve goals.

        Capitalism self-regulates, via unions, demonstrations and police firing tear gas, yet nevertheless it at least has such ability, contrary to Socialism or Social Communism where people have no-one to protest against.

        Another problem with the Capitalism is the power of corporations who’s turnover might be as one of a medium country, which makes their representatives extremely persuasive.

        Well, from my point of view state security is much more problematic to deal with that corporate security.
        Both can play extremely dirty, however if the state is not totally corrupt the it will stand against corporation.

        If it won’t – they will have another revolution, which is rather problematic in socialist countries – people got to be very hungry or very angry to actually do something.

        Reply to Comment
    5. XYZ

      I have a question for our Socialist friends….if Israel in the 1950’s and 1960’s was, as the slogan I quoted above a “worker’s-run state”, why isn’t it today? Why did “the workers” give up control of the economy to the feared capitalists?
      Was it because “the workers” really didn’t run things , but rather their elitist, disconnected “representatives” in the MAPAI-MAPAM-HISTRADRUT-Hevrat Ovdim and these people ended up handing over industries supposedly “owned by the worker” over to the tycoons for less than their real worth? Why would the “workers representatives” do this, unless, of course, they were paid off?
      Who’s to say that if Yonatan Preminger and his “Democratic Worker’r Party” came to power and took over everything that they wouldn’t become as corrupt and sell out their contituents just as the early MAPAI-MAPAM generation of functionaries did?

      Reply to Comment
    6. Gidon

      perhaps all you red baiters wuld like to make a comment about Pinochet? about Honduras? about Silias?
      And to another subject.
      Why cannot DWP join in a front with Hadash? yes there are differences, but all revolutions in the first stage are based on who will not rule!

      Reply to Comment