+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

The most important word missing from these elections

If the Left wants to win elections, it cannot continue to hide its true principles. It must speak clearly and openly about the most pressing issue facing Israel: the occupation.

By Amir Segal

Israeli soldiers arrest a 24 years old Palestinian youth during the weekly protest against the occupation in the West Bank village of Kafr Qaddum, January 3, 2014. (Activestills.org)

Israeli soldiers arrest a 24 years old Palestinian youth during the weekly protest against the occupation in the West Bank village of Kafr Qaddum, January 3, 2014. (Activestills.org)

Isaac Herzog will not be Israel’s next prime minister, and Benjamin Netanyahu overwhelmingly won this election. Now is the time when leftists most often express remorse, admit their mistakes and look for someone to blame for their defeat. The analysis on the loss ranges from long-winded explanations regarding Netanyahu’s success to listing every single failure of Herzog Zionist Camp.

It has become socially acceptable to blame the Left for being disconnected and unable to speak to the people, especially when it comes to Jewish identity. Some commentators see the Ashkenazi-secular identity of the Israeli Left as a reason for its loss. Ram Fruman even claimed that the Left has no chance of winning [Hebrew], and instead it should focus on helping itself.

They are wrong. This pseudo-sociological jargon is no more than an attempt at a clever analysis of a simple problem. More than that, it is pure condescension to think that more “Jewish” or “folksy” election messages will win the hearts and minds of the masses. The truth is that the Israeli Left, as well as the center, have stopped proposing a solution to the biggest, most important problem of Israeli reality — the occupation.

People are barely making it to the end of the month, and both the educational and health care system are in trouble. Many of us won’t be able to buy apartments. This is all true. But the most significant problem is the occupation. It defines our identity, it is the source of our problems in the international community and it will carve out the future of the state. But most of all, it is a perpetual injustice. Why should a politician who does not offer an appropriate response to this issue expect to win elections?

The last time Likud didn’t win an election was 2006, when Kadima received the most votes. It is easy to criticize Kadima and Olmert, but for the sake of historical accuracy, at least Olmert honestly believed that he would continue the “disengagement” (which began with Sharon in 2005) from the Palestinian territories, which would bring an end to the occupation and the establishment of a Palestinian state.

Labor leader Isaac Herzog at an election event (photo: activestills.org)

Labor leader Isaac Herzog at an election event. The occupation was simply not on his priority list during the elections. (photo: activestills.org)

For those who viewed Olmert’s plan as a mistake, or for those who simply hate Olmert and Kadima, it is important not to ignore the fact that his plan was a brave one, and that Olmert wholeheartedly believed he would be able to implement it. Olmert discarded the plan following the Second Lebanon War, and was left with little more than pointless negotiations, which until now have proven to be a mirage.

In this past election cycle, not a single party offered a solution to the occupation, and we didn’t see a single idea that could bring us closer to the inevitable establishment of a Palestinian state. On the contrary, we saw the head of the Zionist Camp, who was supposed to be an alternative to Netanyahu when it came to an agreement with the Palestinians, continue speaking about a “united Jerusalem.” Critics even poked fun at Herzog when he accidentally said he would protect a “united Netanyahu” on primetime television. But while we can forgive his slip of the tongue after weeks of fatigue, we cannot forgive the message that stood behind it.

I have no idea whether Herzog really believes that Jerusalem will remain united, or whether he was bluffing for the sake of winning. But it is difficult to imagine a situation in which most of the neighborhoods of East Jerusalem do not become part of a Palestinian state. Ignoring these principles led to, once more, a loss for the Left.

The establishment of a Palestinian state is a moral duty of the State of Israel. It is the most decent solution to the current problem. We must say it clearly: there will be a Palestinian state. The question is how it will be established, how many people will lose their lives until it comes to fruition and whether it will be a stable country for its citizens — as well as the citizens of Israel.

The Israeli Left, part of which calls itself “the center,” is held hostage to the need to cover up its positions. Sometimes this is seen as “talking directly to the people,” other times it is done in the name of “Jewish identity.” But it almost always avoids offering a practical solution for the establishment of a Palestinian state and an end to the occupation. The Left’s “self-examination” may lead it to forget its principles, as if the periphery would otherwise vote for the Left. This is a mistake.

Election banner - new

Nobody likes to think bad things about themselves, neither on a personal nor a national level. The Right, which ignores the reality of the occupation, continues to win election after election, because the lie Netanyahu told was better than the lie told by the people of the Zionist Camp. The Israeli public understood that the “peace process” is nothing but endless talks with no solution. The same goes for suggestions of annexation, one state or international agreements. While Herzog evaded the question about a deal with the Palestinians, Netanyahu simply lied to the people.

To their credit, Ehud Barak and Ehud Olmert, the two last prime ministers who were not members of Likud during their rule, proposed solutions that seemed relevant back then. Despite all the criticism of their inability to sign an agreement, we cannot ignore the fact that when there is a proposed solution to the Palestinian issue, the public is ready to accept and try it. Olmert and Barak were not elected because they were more “Jewish” or “of the people” than their opponents.

In order to remain relevant, the Israeli Left (as well as the center) must repeat the word “occupation,” which perfectly encapsulates the situation in the West Bank, stop hiding the truth and propose a practical solution. Will this cause the Left to win elections? Perhaps. What is certain is that avoiding the crucial questions will not keep the Right from winning. And anyway, it’s always better to tell the truth.

Amir Segal is a poet, literary critic and CEO of Ovdim. This article was first published on +972′s Hebrew-language sister site, Local Call. Read it in Hebrew here.

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article
  • LEAVE A COMMENT

    * Required

    COMMENTS

    1. Jack Holan

      Since 67′ the Arab side has not internalized & prepared for what needs to be done to achieve Peace. Oslo, could have been a starting point to educate a new generation to embrace the concept of non-violence that would have brought the process forward 90%. The Old Stalwarts will talk Peace to the EU, US UN and Israel but the second they see movement or serious issues come up they will not take a position of negation but one of demand and running to 3rd Parties or an excuse to halt the talks for awhile. Meantime the Street grows restless the Old time PLO in Arabic only raise tensions and give the people the idea of Peace is minus the Jews or a very tiny minuscule country to be dealt with later,
      The past year the now PA/Hamas has said no talks they are only going to international organizations and forcing their plan on Israel. SuddenlyI, 2 days before the election the game to influence events Abbas states he’s always wanted to negotiate, Maybe his people don’t see through these charades, we do.

      Reply to Comment
      • Brian

        What you write about Abbas is just false. It is interesting to see the distortions and self-delusions the Israeli average Joe uses to excuse and put out of mind what he is doing to another people.

        Reply to Comment
      • Kareem Jeans

        Those bastards! What about the Indiginous bats they are displacing?

        Reply to Comment
    2. Jack Holan

      i see u need to tow the line of your Agenda to get posted. It’s sad because if I’m respectful and make a legitimate point contrary to yours it creates dialog.

      Reply to Comment
    3. Bruce Gould

      One of the hardest things for people to grasp is that reality changes: Ayman Odeh of the Joint List is a fan of Martin Luther King – whatever the conflict was about in 1990 it has now morphed into a civil rights/anti-apartheid struggle, and the Palestinians want in, not out.

      Reply to Comment
      • Kareem Jeans

        No, its a political struggle
        I hope he internalizes the lesson thst Dr. King taught about anti-Zionism

        Reply to Comment
    4. Weiss

      The Fascists have tilted the political spectrum so far to the right that the “left” is now in the CENTER…

      … Which is a direct consequence of embracing Fascism.

      This is the true existential threat that is destroying Israel FROM WITHIN

      Reply to Comment
      • Pedro X

        Actually, Netanyahu has tilted the right back towards the center. The far right party Yachad was wiped out. The Jewish Home party to the right of Likud lost 33% of their seats. Yisrael Beitenu lost almost 50% of their seats. Shas and UTJ lost 5 of their previous 18 seats. Khalon’s party, a liberal Herut Likud, claimed 10 seats.

        Israel remains in the good hands of Netanyahu and Yaalon and will have the help of Khalon to make better the housing and social sectors. Hopefully Gideon Saar will find a way to help his fellow Likudniks in government.

        Reply to Comment
        • Weiss

          Like Goebels said: Repeat the LIE enough and it will become YOUR truth.

          This government is FASCIST and nothing you say will ever change this fact.

          Reply to Comment
          • Gustav

            The only fascists are the Islamo fascists like Hamas and those on the far left who support them. People like you Weissy boy.

            Reply to Comment