+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

'The Joint List isn't turning its back on Israeli society'

As an oppressed and colonized minority, we will only ever achieve real change in Israeli policy when we behave as a coherent national group. This does not, however, mean we are excluding our Jewish allies.

By Awad Abdelfattah

Joint List leader, Ayman Odeh, speaks during the party's Hebrew-language launch event, Tel Aviv, February 11, 2015. (Photo: Activestills.org)

Joint List leader, Ayman Odeh, speaks during the party’s Hebrew-language launch event, Tel Aviv, February 11, 2015. (Photo: Activestills.org)

The true strategic significance of the creation of the Joint Arab List has eluded most Israelis. Even among Arab Palestinians inside Israel, the common assumption is that the List’s sole objective is to surmount the electoral threshold after it was raised to 3.25 percent by Avigdor Lieberman’s Yisrael Beiteinu party, thereby increasing the influence of the Arab minority in Israeli politics.

This is undoubtedly a major aim — but it is not the most important one. Rather, the formation of the Joint List finally puts the Arab parties on a shared path towards the much-delayed goal of re-organizing our community.

The unification of the Arab parties came late, but the idea has been under discussion for many years. It was first proposed by the Balad party back in 1999 and is consistent with our platform that the Palestinian minority must be organized on a national basis.

The pressure on the political parties from the Arab public to unite had been mounting in recent years. The Palestinian minority has faced ever greater hostility as well as an escalation in racist legislation and incitement from the State. As the Arab members of Knesset became more marginalized, Palestinian citizens’ loss of faith in the political game grew. More and more of them chose to stay at home on election day, either out of indifference or because they actively boycotted Knesset elections. Now that the Arab parties have responded, the Arab public will expect to see this cooperation not only sustained in the Knesset and on the ground, but expanded.

Communist concerns

In the 2012 elections, the Communist Party (Hadash, a joint Arab-Jewish list) was the only one of the four Arab parties in the Knesset to object to the idea of unification. It argued that unity would alienate Israeli Jews and would lead to increased retaliation from the establishment. But a deeper reason for Hadash’s objection stemmed from its time-honored reliance on a Stalinist approach that espouses internationalism as a way to degrade nationalism. Some observers noted the contradiction in the Communist Party’s position, since it acknowledged Israel as the state of the Jewish people immediately after 1948, and its membership cards were titled “The Communist Party of Israeli Patriots.”

Iman Odeh, Dov Khenin and Aida Touma-Suliman of Hadash planting trees in Kfar Yassuf, February 4, 2015. (Photo: Ala Yediya)

Iman Odeh, Dov Khenin and Aida Touma-Suliman of Hadash planting trees in Kfar Yassuf, February 4, 2015. (Photo: Ala Yediya)

Moreover, the Hadash leadership always maintained it could not enter an electoral pact with the two other major parties, the Islamic Movement and Balad, because it identified as both a secular as well as an Arab-Jewish party. It also argued that such unification would present an image of Arab citizens as separatists, antagonizing Israeli Jews and the State. Instead Hadash preferred an integrationist approach, advocating Arab-Jewish cooperation based on communist principles rather than adopting liberal democratic values. The party advocated equality and rights for the Palestinian minority without specifying what form such rights should take.

This approach hit a crisis in the 1980s and 1990s as the Soviet Union crumbled. Both liberal-democratic values and the collective rights discourse entrenched with European charters in 1992 and 1995 safeguarding national minority rights became the order of the day.

Balad’s different discourse

Balad, meanwhile, advanced a different political discourse after it was established in the mid-1990s, immediately after the Oslo Accords were signed. The Accords left the matter of the Palestinian minority’s rights in Israel unresolved. We called for full citizenship and recognition of our national identity. Equal citizenship, in our view, bound a democracy to its citizens. We argued that no equality could be achieved as long as Israel was a Jewish state. As for the question of national identity, we argued that full citizenship was not possible unless the Palestinian minority was allowed the right to administer its cultural affairs.

MK Jamal Zahalka (Balad) marches along with thousands of people march through Jerusalem in support and solidarity with the Max Rayne “Hand in Hand” bilingual school, which was the target of a racist arson attack a week earlier, Jerusalem, December 5, 2014. (Photo by Oren Ziv/Activestills.org)

MK Jamal Zahalka (Balad) marches along with thousands of people march through Jerusalem in support and solidarity with the Max Rayne “Hand in Hand” bilingual school, which was the target of a racist arson attack a week earlier, Jerusalem, December 5, 2014. (Photo by Oren Ziv/Activestills.org)

Our demand that Palestinians in Israel have a right to self-determination was based on contemporary democratic political theory and drew on the experiences of national and ethnic minorities in modern Western states, such as the Quebecois in Canada, the German-speaking minority of the South Tyrol region in northern Italy, and others. Making such demands did not necessarily entail campaigning for a separate state, nor for an absolute autonomy based on either demographic or geographic criteria. Rather it required a minimum form of cultural autonomy, which entitles a community to organize on a national basis. Such minorities expect their own national institutions and elected leadership — or a higher council. This is the only way they can preserve their national identity and their historic narrative, and have some control over their development as a national minority.

In our case, this form of national organization would be a vital defense against Israeli policies designed to divide and fragment us into small sectarian, tribal and ethnic minorities. For example, the Palestinian Druze community has been cut off from the Palestinian people culturally since the 1950s, when it was forced to serve in the Israeli army.

Changing dynamics

The formation of the Joint List is likely to mark a radical change in perceptions within the Arab parties, and particularly within Hadash, regarding how we relate to the Zionist regime. Hadash has consistently opposed rebuilding the deeply flawed and unrepresentative Higher Arab Monitoring Committee (an independent political organization whose aim is to coordinate the political actions of various Arab groups in Israel) as a truly representative national body, supported by a locally-financed national fund financed. It is still far from clear that Hadash is ready to consider this step. But in finally joining a predominantly Arab electoral list, it has forsaken a major long-cherished tenet — namely, its rejection of organizing the Palestinian minority.

Election banner - new

I have been closely involved in the debate among the senior Arab leadership on this issue for the past 15 years. In that time it has only grown clearer to me that, as an oppressed and colonized minority, we will only ever achieve real change in Israeli policy when we behave as a coherent national group.

Those on the Zionist left, focused exclusively on ending Netanyahu’s rule, perceive the role of the Joint List in terms of effecting a change in the balance between the right-wing parties and the Zionist Camp. Given the current reality, in which polls show there will be no such change at this election, the more significant role of the List should be viewed in terms of empowering the Palestinian minority from within.

I very much hope that the unprecedented success of the Arab parties in uniting will open the way for further strategic steps, especially rebuilding the Higher Arab Monitoring Committee. If we obtain as many as 15 seats, such a reconstruction would greatly improve the balance of power.

This would not be a separatist step. The Joint List has not turned its back on Israeli society. To ensure the Arab parties preserve an avenue to Israeli Jewish society, the List has highlighted its platform’s democratic components, both in its declared principles and in having a democratic Israeli Jew among the first ten seats.

The Joint List is the only truly democratic party running in these Israeli elections. It advocates full equality for all citizens, in national and civil rights. It calls for an end to the colonial, apartheid regime in the 1967 territories, and it believes that consolidating our own unity can strengthen the Palestinian struggle in ways that help our brethren in the West Bank, Gaza and those in exile.

The List is driving home the message to the Israeli public that Palestinians in Israel will never renounce their right to full equality. Proper citizenship is achievable for the Palestinian minority but only when the colonial and racist structure of Israel’s version of apartheid is dismantled.

Awad Abdelfattah is the secretary-general of Balad, one of four Arab parties in the Joint List.

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article
  • LEAVE A COMMENT

    * Required

    COMMENTS

    1. Jello

      The party will break up within 6 months of the election, probably sooner.

      The ‘democratic Jew’ in the top 10 is an old school communist and it was nice of you guys to put a token Jew on the list though I would guess that reflects Hadash more so than the party as a whole.

      Balad is not a democratic party. It is a purely sectarian pan-Arab nationalist party that wants to eliminate Israel and as demonstrated recently is fundamentally incapable of cooperation with any parties not dominated by Arabs.

      That communists, Islamists and Arab nationalists can work with each other but not with any Jewish-dominated parties only demonstrates that the Arabs of Israel are primarily focused on eliminating Israel rather than working for constructive change within it.

      Reply to Comment
      • Bryan

        You may or may not be right about how long the part will survive for, but all political parties in Israel seem to be exceedingly fragile entities, highly fragmented on sectarian lines, prone to breakaways, constantly merging and re-merging, and often the fiefdom of some personality who temporarily attains dominance before their fortune wanes. Wikipedia provides a list of dozens and dozens of these entities. (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_political_parties_in_Israel#Former_parties). Even the major parties of the Knesset are short-lived – the current crop includes Yesh Atid (founded 2012), the Jewish Home (founded 2008), Yisrael Beiteinu (founded 1999), United Torah Judaism (founded 1992), Hatnuah (founded 2012), Meretz (founded 1992), Balad (founded 1995), Kadima (founded 2005). Compare this with proper democracies where you will find a few mass-membership parties that have maintained consistent policies over many decades and are not based on a cult of personality or easily fractured by disputes within the hierarchy.

        Reply to Comment
        • Jello

          The point is that this party can’t herald a new direction because it is inherently internally incoherent and its message is pure spin.

          Israel is a young democracy with lots of problems. The dynamic party politics in the country reflects that loyally.

          Reply to Comment
          • Bryan

            Indeed, Jello, Israel is a country with a lot of problems, but where is the vision of politicians to address these. All there seems to be is a don’t rock the boat attitude, there is no alternative to the status quo, and loyalty alone will sort things out. Surely every Israeli can see that their state is becoming a pariah and increasingly isolated and an embarrassment to the civilised world. Cometh the time, where will the man come from? No – disaster looms if Bibi does not return to lead his country down the path to failure. Don’t worry a small number of plutocrats are constantly enriching themselves whilst the ordinary citizen cannot afford decent housing – no problem – that will strengthen the settlement project, whilst subsidies for settlements and the inordinate cost of military spending undermine social provision, education, health-care and investment in infrastructure (apart from settler roads). Funding has run out even for the separation barrier which was supposedly essential to secure Israel’s civilians.

            Reply to Comment
    2. Pedro X

      The Joint list would not enter an agreement with Meretz because the joint list says that Meretz is a Zionist party and the Arab party with not deal with Zionists which account for almost 100% of Jews in Israel.

      Meanwhile the communications director of the Joint List said that ISIS learned its tactics from the Zionist movement. When asked if Hamas was a terrorist organization the director said no, Hamas had a right to do what it was doing.

      So here we have the true face of the Joint List, extremely hostile to Zionists and supportive of terrorists who want to kill Zionists.

      Reply to Comment
    3. Mustafa Rashid

      There are so many problems with this article that it’s hard to know where to to begin. It’s enough just to point out that the author considers that espousing internationalism is a “Stalinist approach” and “a way to degrade nationalism.” Even a very basic knowledge of socialist history is enough to know that the opposite is true. Unfortunately much of the so-called “left” in Israel – both the Arab list and its Zionist equivalents – is made up of bourgeois nationalists, who are not offering anything even close to a left-wing alternative. I usually enjoy and respect +972 magazine, but this article is only useful as an example of the nationalist dead end that we currently face.

      Reply to Comment