Appreciate this article? +972 depends on your support.

Click here to help us keep going

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

The Israeli Gaza flotilla inquiry is a sham

The Turkel Committee (investigating the legality of Israel’s lethal response to the Gaza Flotilla in May of this year) is not only a transparent sham, it also undermines what little faith remains in the Israeli system’s ability to scrutinize and correct its own mistakes.  

 

Noam has previously posted on a critical review [Hebrew] of the Turkel Committee (investigating the legality of Israel’s lethal response to the Gaza Flotilla in May of this year), by the Israeli blogger Tom. Now, in the final installment [Hebrew] of his critique, Tom uncovers his most damming finding yet.

Here is what committee member Reuven Merhav has to say about the legality of Israel’s siege on Gaza, while questioning a witness, during the hearings themselves:

… the state determines these things, and it declares a closure, and announces it, and it is legal by any standard, the supreme court approves it, and it meets every standard of international law… [emphasis mine]

And here is what the committee was asked to determine by the government when it was formed:

2.       The committee was asked to relate to an assessment of the security circumstances of placing the maritime closure on the Gaza Strip and the maritime closure’s compatibility with the rules of international law. [emphasis mine]

As you can easily see, the committee is not only evenhanded and unprejudiced, it is also remarkably efficient. Even before the hearings are concluded, one of its members (who is, by the way, no expert on international law) has already managed to answer one of the most difficult questions put before the committee. Mission accomplished.

Even one of his fellow panelists can see the problem:

I would like first of all, [to make] perhaps an interim comment, following previous comments, previous questions. Of course the question of the legitimacy of the Israeli maritime closure is a question that was put before the committee, and we will have to decide it after a full analysis of the facts and the legal aspects.

You don’t say?

Tom continues to plow through the committee’s protocols, and finds plenty of further evidence substantiating the committee’s gross bias (as well as boorish sexism and racism), but really, is anything further required? The Turkel Committee is not only a transparent sham, it also undermines what little faith remains in the Israeli system’s ability to scrutinize and correct its own mistakes.  

Note: the two quotes of Turkel committee members were translated by me, as the official translation of the protocol has not yet been posted on the committee’s website.

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article
  • LEAVE A COMMENT

    * Required

    COMMENTS

    1. […] not a surprise, of course; Anyone who paid attention knew the Turkel Committee is a sham months ago. It’s just so unusual to hear it from the horse’s mouth. Even so, it is unlikely […]

      Reply to Comment