+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

The false story Israel tells itself about the Middle East

According to Israel’s leaders, the Middle East is made up of primitive tribespeople and Islamic radicals who cannot be negotiated with. They’re wrong.

By Idan Barir and Ori Goldberg

File photo of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu looking out over the Egyptian border. (Ariel Jerozolimski/POOL/FLASH90)

File photo of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu looking out over the Egyptian border. (Ariel Jerozolimski/POOL/FLASH90)

Nearly a month ago, a hearing at the Knesset’s State Control Committee that looked into the State Comptroller’s report on Israel’s handling of Operation Protective Edge, brought together Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Meretz chairwoman Zehava Galon. During the hearing, Galon asked the prime minister what kind of future he proposes for Israeli citizens. His response had quite an impact on his supporters, who shared the video on social media under the headline, “The prime minister silences Zehava Galon.” For nearly three minutes, Netanyahu, in a rare moment of spontaneity, honesty and fervor, fleshed out his political, security-based, and economic worldview. It would behoove us to analyze how Netanyahu views the reality in the region, and perhaps especially the distinction between truth and lies.

“I suggest you get to know the reality,” Netanyahu said to Galon. “You wanted a ‘New Middle East?’ You got it. Radical Islam is everywhere. Any territory you evacuate, you get radical Islam […] more tunnels, more rockets […] have I solved the problem of Hamas? Without fully occupying you cannot solve the problem […] I don’t have the option of cleansing the Middle East around me of this murderous ideology, just as unfortunately I cannot cleanse Syria or Iraq from the murderous ideology of ISIS, and unfortunately we currently have no way to change Iran’s obsessive ideology.”

Between ISIS and the tribespeople

It turns out that according to the prime minister, at the root of the Middle East lies radical Islam. Thus, anywhere we leave radical Islam alone, it comes bubbling to the surface. Let’s put aside the baseless connection between Hamas and ISIS. Let’s focus on what Netanyahu was getting at: there are no real states in the Middle States. One cannot “cleanse” Syria and Iraq, or accede territory to Palestinians, since the sovereign Middle East state is no more than a cover. It does not have the vitality or the grasp that radical Islam has. And since radical Islam is characterized by obsessiveness and irrationality, one cannot negotiate with it. This is very sad, of course, but “we have no choice.” Israel is a state, and since states are rational entities that fully understand the reality, they define everything that stands before it as the exact opposite.

Netanyahu’s comments are one side of the coin. On the other side is our work as researchers of the Middle East. When we write about the complexity of the region and falsehoods such as “the Arabs are the same Arabs,” we often encounter a variation on the following theme: “There are no real states in the Middle East. No nationalities. Only tribes, ethnic minorities, extended families and local-ancient identities. Every attempt to engage with this reality is bound for failure, since one cannot hold stable, valid negotiations with such a wide group. They do what is good for them whenever is good for them, and a state cannot rely on such childish and primitive behavior.”

A clear example for this argument is, of course, “it’s great that we did not sign a peace agreement with Assad’s father that would have seen the return of the Golan Heights.” Even many who understand the complex reality in the region think this way. The belief that states do not really exist in the Middle East is stronger than any other. The threats that engulf Israel on all sides have become entrenched in popular opinion: on the one hand, we face widespread radical Islam. On the other side is always the lone Arab or Muslim whose very essence seeks to undermine all possibility of minimal stability. If only there were states here, rational entities with whom we could reach understandings and live alongside in peace, then, maybe. But there are none. And that’s it.

Losing our grip

The Israeli public is involuntarily blind to the fact that this worldview assumes “the rational” is a synonym for progress, democracy, and humanity. In other words, everything we are and everything our neighborhood isn’t. Thus, if rationality is an expression of humanity, then rejecting it means rejecting humanity. The de-rationalization of the region is its dehumanization. This way, the Jewish-Israeli collective defines itself as supreme over the riffraff of the Middle East, who are either tribespeople or radical Islamists, and in any case they remain in self-important collectives, bereft of any independent humanity or rationality that leaves them with little-to-no simple, pragmatic judgement of their own.

Yet the truth, as it so happens, is more complex. There are states in the Middle East. There are rational leaderships making their way with determination and sensitivity, just like us. Not always successfully, and sometimes due to a different rationale than “ours.” That goes for Iraq, Tunisia, Egypt, the Emirates, Turkey, and even Iran. In Israel we have abandoned our respect for the process and worldview of others, holding fast to their failures as if they were the most important thing. Our truths — which belong to us alone — are total, much like our grief. Our grief. And other truths, sometimes competing ones, are not true at all.

The power of Netanyahu’s Israel, at least in its view, is in its difference, its uniqueness, its isolation, and defensive seclusion. Beyond that, Israel sees itself as the only truth in a closed and evil region based on lies and forgery, denial and blindness. And yet, those who divide the world into “everything” or “nothing” lose their grip on reality.

Idan Barir and Dr. Ori Goldberg are research fellows at The Forum for Regional Thinking. This post was originally published in Hebrew on Local Call.

50 Years Too Many in-text banner

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article
  • LEAVE A COMMENT

    * Required

    COMMENTS

    1. Itshak Gordin Halevy

      What is the “Forum for regional thinking”? Probably 2-3 self-proclaimed “researchers”. In my room I am a researcher too and I think that they are wrong.

      Reply to Comment
    2. Fran Sharpe

      I wish you would give more examples of the rational leadership in the middles east.

      Reply to Comment
      • Mark

        Is sectarian kleptocracy rational?

        Reply to Comment
    3. i_like_ike52

      Very bizarre piece. No wonder the “progressive” Left in Israel is imploding. All they can do is repeat the famous quip attributed to Groucho Marx who said “who are you going to believe? Me, or your lying eyes?”. When we see around us in the Middle East massive violence, corruption, imploding states, destruction of minorities, our two writers tell us “when they are rational, they simply have a different rationality than we do”. I’ll say its different!
      Their “rationality” says that they are in a perpetual war with the Jews. Our “rationality” says otherwise. Our post-modernist writers tell us that their “rationality” is just as valid as ours is. I guess so! It’s just there is no room for us Jews in their ‘rational’ Middle East.

      They tell us that not all the states in the Middle East are imploding. We should ignore Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Libya and the recent horrific civil wars in Algeria and Lebanon, and focus instead on the Emirates (reactionary medieval monarchies), Turkey (well on its way to becoming an outright dictatorship), Egypt (wracked with violence, failing economy) and, above all IRAN! according to the writers, we Israelis can look to them as “peace partners”. I would like to ask the writers if they would like to live in any of these “rational states”?
      The writers of this piece remind me of the television serious about a Jewish family in Germany after the National Socialists came to power in 1933. The husband tells his wife that they had better get out of there. She replies “I will not leave, this is the land of Geothe and Schiller”. The husband replies “but my dear, they are not in power at the moment!”. Same here….the truly “rational” elements are not in power anywhere in the Middle East at the moment.

      Reply to Comment
    4. Ben

      This is good writing. Contrary to the deliberately catastrophizing picture painted by the right (a catastrophizing that Ehud Barak recently debunked) a Palestinian state living side by side in peace with Israel could be a crucial new beginning. An asset to the whole region. Israel could definitely engineer this outcome if it devoted one tenth of the energy it devotes to savagely oppressing an entire people. Ike52 neglects to mention the tremendous festering irrationality—political, economic, military, security-wise—of the occupation. The only thing that makes it “rational” for Israel is that it calculates that the price it has to pay to end it—relinquishing territory and reigning in its fanatical settlers—is higher than the huge price it pays to maintain the occupation.

      Reply to Comment
      • Itshak Gordin Halevy

        The “Palestinians” do not want any Jews in their artificial “Palestinian State”. So more than 500’000 Jews should be expelled from the Judea and Samaria to let these areas Judenrein. Do you approve this ethnic cleansing?

        Reply to Comment
        • brightdarkness

          I’ve always thought that if all the Jews have to expelled from a palestinian west bank why can’t all or at least an equal number of palestinians/arabs be expelled from the remainder of Israel?

          Fair is fair.

          Reply to Comment
        • Ben

          They Say, We Say:
          http://peacenow.org/page.php?id=2939#.WSqQxGjyu01

          (Brightdarkr, the Palestinians were expelled, in ’48. Of course. And removal of the settlers is not an expelling, it is a withdrawing of civilians unlawfully transferred.)

          Reply to Comment
          • Itshak Gordin Halevy

            Do you really think that the Israelis will agree? And what about all the Jewish communities expelled from the Arab countries in the 50s and 60s (more than 800’000 persons).

            Reply to Comment
    5. Sarcastic Randall

      Yes, the North African and Middle Eastern peoples are very intelligent, kind, advanced, rational human beings. This can be seen in many European states where the benefits of Islamic immigration are now bearing fruits in terms of improved security, greater diversity and enhanced work skills. This is particularly the case with the 2nd generation European-born moslems.

      Reply to Comment
      • Mark

        2nd generation immigrants are amongst the last residents of Europe to take the sky fairy seriously.

        Reply to Comment
        • Randall the Sarcastic

          Mark – the Manchester bomber was a “2nd generation migrant”. As I say, very kind, rational, hard-working person. More like him are crossing the Mediterranean daily – I believe about 5000 per day.

          Reply to Comment
    6. Mark

      Seems bizarre to me that IL has “settled” 500K+ Jews in the WB but not a single Palestinian refugee has been resettled in the last 70 years, whether in WB, Gaza or elsewhere out of Israel’s control. They are still stuck in camps. Why is that?

      Reply to Comment
    7. Mark

      The panegyric to Assad’s Syria published by one of +972 regular contributors, contrary to the views of Syrian citizens, is more than sufficient to understand quite how blind the Left is to freedom and liberty in the Arab world.

      Reply to Comment

The stories that matter.
The missing context.
All in one weekly email.

Subscribe to +972's newsletter