+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

Taking protests to the frontline in the U.S. and Israel-Palestine

As injustices continue to mount up in the U.S. and Israel-Palestine, young activists are taking the fight to politicians and powerbrokers.

By Yaser Abu Areesha

David Friedman, President Donald Trump’s pick for U.S. ambassador to Israel, sat through questioning in a Senate confirmation hearing this week, as part of the process any nominee has to go through before their appointment is approved. He wasn’t expecting the surprise that Palestinian and Jewish political activists — all U.S. citizens — had prepared for him.

Friedman’s responses were cut short throughout the hearing by young people who hurled accusations at him regarding his views on a solution to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict and over his support for the settlement enterprise in the West Bank. Friedman, who favors moving the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem, discovered that the road to the Temple Mount is not decked with roses. His frozen expression and fixed gaze every time an activist interrupted him and was removed from the hearing gave him away.

These young people expressed their opinions to Trump’s appointee freely and directly. They could have staged a more regime-friendly demonstration outside the hall, but chose what is becoming a more and more prominent tool for protesting in front of decision-makers: the in-your-face protest.

A similar protest took place in Israel on Thursday evening. In a small, quiet room stood Internal Security Minister Gilad Erdan and Police Commissioner Roni Alsheikh, present for a ceremony to mark the opening of a police station in Jaffa. The pair were joined by dozens participants, among them the Chief Rabbi of Tel Aviv, respected members of the Jaffa community, police officers, members of the public — and several social and political activists who had prepared a surprise similar to that received by Friedman.

The activists — Inbal Sinai, Yigal Rambam and Khaled Jabarin — cut off Erdan as he was speaking. Rambam accused Erdan of incitement and racism against Palestinians and Ethiopians. Jabarin asked him who he thought had shot Yaqub Abu Al-Qi’an to death in Umm el-Hiran last month, prior to a series of violent home demolitions.

Protesters demonstrate against Trump's Muslim ban, Boston, January 29, 2017. (Tess Scheflan/Activestills)

Protesters demonstrate against Trump’s Muslim ban, Boston, January 29, 2017. (Tess Scheflan/Activestills)

Sinai demanded that Erdan apologize for his incitement against Palestinian citizens of Israel during the “wave of arson” that wasn’t and for the “ISIS ramming attack” in Umm el-Hiran. The three protesters were hauled out of the room, detained and released under restricted conditions, including being banned from protesting for the next month.

These direct protests against decision-makers prove that they reverberate and raise awareness, even if they don’t involve huge numbers of people. They were targeted demonstrations which made noise and delivered a clear, distinct message.

The age of post-truth and alternative facts is also a new era for protest movements and activists around the world. Governments will stop at nothing to disseminate their lies and to stupefy the people they’re supposed to serve. Societal divisions have made it harder to fight a predatory regime, as have disagreements over sources of information and rifts in how reality is perceived — splits that governments can control and cultivate.

Nonetheless, individual protests and direct actions are turning the tables. The element of surprise, the disruptions, and the messages delivered point-blank, are undermining powerbrokers’ sense of stability and security.

This is a new age for protest, in which someone can stand directly opposite a government official and tell that person exactly what they, and many others, think. In these troubled times, people are coming to understand that being a decision-maker is not just a title. On the contrary, it’s flesh and blood with a name and address. A decision-maker is responsible for every step they take, and if they betray their primary role — impartial service to the public — they are liable to be faced with an especially fierce protest.

Yaser Abu Areesha is a student at Tel Aviv University. This article was first published in Hebrew on Local Call. Read it here. Translated by Natasha Roth.

Newsletter banner

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article

    * Required


    1. i_like_ike52

      These people, Inbal Sinai, Yigal Rambam and Khaled Jabarin, think they are being heroic in confronting politicians they know are not going to do anything to them when they shout them down. Well, it was in Germany and Russia, during their weak democratic regimes that extremists like these also shouted down democratic politicians. so this gang is joining the ranks of the anti-democratic extremists while pulling their childish political tantrums.
      If Khaled REALLY wants to be a hero, have him go to Ramallah or Gaza and shout down the FATAH or HAMAS politicians who are ripping off his brother Palestinians there. That would really show how much guts he has.

      Reply to Comment
      • Ben

        Actually, no, Ike. Areesha contextualizes well why these activists of this time are justified in these techniques and are distinctly not shouting down democratic politicians of weak democratic regimes and why Erdan is hardly some Weimar liberal democrat.
        Plenty of Israeli and foreign activists do bravely face down IDF troops and marauding settlers all the time, but this earns your contempt.
        It will definitely be time to face down Palestinian politicians when they actually have a state instead of a corrupted, exploited, economically strangled, welfare dependent set of occupied bantustans.
        And we have all seen enough scenes of MKs wildly shouting people down in the Knesset, and even moving to physically assault them, to be skeptical of your sensitivity to shouting in political arenas.

        Reply to Comment