Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

NY Times

  • The 'NY Times' puts apartheid on page one

    Netanyahu and the Israeli right's alternative to the two-state solution appears to be taking shape. There are only so many ways of describing that shape, and the reality to which it leads. Out of the six times that the word apartheid has been used to describe Israel or Israeli policy on page A1 of the New York Times over the past nine years, four were in the past month alone, according to a search of the paper’s online archives conducted Tuesday. [tmwinpost] What, if anything, has changed? It’s hard to say without being privy to the editorial considerations and political…

    Read More... | 2 Comments
  • 'New York Times' on Jerusalem violence: What occupation?

    Bureau chief Jodi Rudoren’s new article doesn’t even rise to the level of false moral equivalence. I don’t like to pile on in the left-wing criticism of the New York Times’ coverage of Israel/Palestine; as a rule I find it irritatingly “even-handed,” equating the violence of the subjugator with that of the subjugated, but this, after all, is a big step up compared to the coverage by so many other American media, which simply see the Palestinians as the aggressors and Israel as fighting back in self-defense. But yesterday’s article by Jerusalem bureau chief Jodi Rudoren about the violence in…

    Read More... | 11 Comments
  • Israel's Left forgot what dissent really means

    Dissent means going against the majority when you believe the majority is wrong -- and not just to be contrary. That means being unpopular almost by definition; the majority will never send us flowers. My colleague Mairav Zonszein has written an eloquent piece in The New York Times decrying the state of dissent in Israel, lamenting the persecutions and constraints on those who criticized the latest Gaza war from the left. She points to a number of disgraceful examples. The article has generated debate, as observed here. However, much of it breaks down along disappointingly predictable lines: those further to…

    Read More... | 43 Comments
  • Silencing dissent in Israel - continued

    Silencing dissent doesn't only mean directly quashing free speech. Silencing, or a chilling effect, also take place when certain forces in society dominate and monopolize the narrative, deciding what is acceptable, what is fringe and what is mainstream. Judaism for me is a sensibility of collective self-questioning and uncomfortable truth-telling: the dafka-like quality of awkwardness and dissent for which we were once known. It is not enough to stand at a tangent to other peoples’ conventions; we should also be the most unforgiving critics of our own. I feel a debt of responsibility to this past. It is why I…

    Read More... | 38 Comments

The stories that matter.
The missing context.
All in one weekly email.

Subscribe to +972's newsletter