Appreciate this article? +972 depends on your support.

Click here to help us keep going

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

State to court: No gov't approval for Yishai's plan to arrest Sudanese en masse

In its response to a petition filed by human rights organizations and six African asylum seekers, the State Attorney’s office said today that the government has not made an official decision to arrest Sudanese refugees. The reply also said that Interior Minister Eli Yishai, who stated publicly that asylum seekers have until October 15 to leave the country on their own accord, spoke without government authorization. 

According to the Association for Civil Rights in Israel, one of the organizations that filed the petition in hopes of preventing the state from detaining asylum seekers:

The State Attorney emphasized in its reply that the Population and Immigration Authority received no instructions to arrest Sudanese citizens, and that should such a decision be reached in the future, it shall be published through official channels by the Authority thirty days prior to its execution

The State Attorney’s response to the petition comes two weeks after a Jerusalem court answered the same with petition with a temporary injunction prohibiting the detention of Sudanese.

Speaking of the State Attorney’s remarks, ACRI attorney Oded Feller said:

Eli Yishai, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of the Interior of the State of Israel, took a severe and unprecedented act, and no responsible authority took action to restrain him.  The minister responsible for treatment of asylum seekers did not hesitate to issue the baseless and cruel announcement that thousands of asylum seekers along with their children would be detained in extreme conditions in the desert.  The decree sowed panic among thousands of people, including refugees and victims of genocide and torture, women, children and infants. The Prime Minister and Attorney General, who knew the announcement had no foundation, stood by and said nothing.

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article
  • LEAVE A COMMENT

    * Required

    COMMENTS

    1. Beware: the State Attorney did not deny the authroity to arrest and indefinately detain, but said that if such order was issued, a 30 day rule would be applied. The High Court has a history of ducking constitutional jurisprudence by focusing on administrative rules (which can then be slightly changed to avoid the Court’s substantive intent). All the State Attorney is saying is that if they decide to do what must be assumed they can do, they will honor the 30 day notice rule.

      Yet there is some fear of autonomous court action here; and it shows that NGOs can make lived life difference–for a while, anyway. The courts, generally, have yet to stake and independent stand.

      Reply to Comment