+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

Risk of unrest grows as Israel redraws relations with Arab citizens

Israel sees its Arab citizens as a security threat, and their leaders are increasingly under attack. While cooperation and political participation once seemed feasible, systematic discrimination has led to an untenable situation. Balad’s secretary general on missed opportunities and grim predictions.

By Awad Abdelfattah 

More and more voices among the 1.2 million Palestinians in Israel have been asking whether Israel is trying to redefine the rules of the game that have governed the relationship between the state and the Palestinians since 1948. In recent years, and especially since the outbreak of the second intifada in October 2000, Arab citizens have been re-characterized by the state of Israel as a security and demographic threat, like they were between 1948 and 1966, when they were subject to military rule.

Since 2000, a new series of repressive and discriminatory practices and laws have been implemented and legislated. Palestinian leaders in the Knesset have been systematically threatened and some have been prosecuted. The continued campaign of delegitimization has taken almost unprecedented forms. MK Haneen Zoabi, an MK from my party, Balad, has repeatedly received death threats from unknown right-wingers, and was been stripped of her diplomatic passport after participating in the 2010 flotilla that tried to break the siege on Gaza. Voices from the ruling Likud party have called to remove her and her party from the Knesset.

Attempts by the right-wing ruling coalition to further marginalize the Arab community and its political parties in the Knesset are manifested in a flood of racist laws aimed at restricting their political movement and expression. Our party – the National Democratic Assembly, known as Balad in Hebrew – is the most heavily targeted. Its former leader, Azmi Bishara, faced a fabricated security charge in 2007 involving alleged collaboration with Hezbollah. He preferred to leave the country and remain in exile rather than face such a charge, for which lawyers cannot properly defend their client, since they are not given access to all of the material in the investigation.

But the campaign against him started long before, and it is ideological and political in essence. It was cited clearly in a book written by the former head of the Israel Security Agency, Ami Ayalon, who demanded in 2001 that Bishara be brought to trial for allegedly crossing “red lines.” Ayalon accused Bishara of rejecting the right of the Jews to a Jewish state. The party itself has been subjected to repeated attempts at disqualification from Knesset elections.

The goal of the party as stated in its platform is to reinvent Israel as a state of all its citizens. That would mean that 20 percent of the citizens of the Jewish state, who are an indigenous ethnic minority, would be entitled to full equality, and would have genuine  legislative and political power to improve their status and their lives in a democratic secular state.

The emergence of Balad and its platform in 1996 quickly gained wide support from Arab citizens and scores of non-Zionist Jewish Israeli intellectuals. It was viewed by many as the most modern and liberal democratic formula to emerge among the Arab Palestinian community in Israel since 1948.

This community had undergone major social, economic, and political changes since the 1970s. A new intelligentsia emerged, looking for ways to express its needs and aspirations. This epoch witnessed the start of a new national and civic consciousness among the Arab elites who sought collective and individual rights and equal citizenship.  Political thinking changed with regard to participation in elections for Knesset, which had been viewed by many Arab citizens as a predominantly Zionist institution. Most of the founders of Balad, both individuals and groups, had previously refrained from engaging in the parliamentary game, and others had previously advocated a one-state solution.

The transition to a norm of participation – i.e., voting in Knesset elections – was painful and has been viewed by many inside the party as a major compromise. The leaders of Balad had hoped this new approach of seeking parliamentary representation would help create a more convenient climate for a dialogue with liberal Israelis and pave the way for the future bi-national entity.

However, the campaign against the party that began with the second intifada has continued and escalated, as members are routinely harassed and interrogated by the police. Israeli officials continue to claim that Arab citizens are not as extreme as their leaders, in order to drive a wedge between them. For most Palestinians in Israel, this claim is a worn-out cliché. Israeli officials can no longer deceive Arab citizens, as was the case in the 1950s and 1960s, when they were subjected to a tight system of control under military rule.

The continued incitement campaign against Arab parties like Balad and their leaders is perceived by many Arab citizens as a tactic to distance them from their representatives. Many also see it as a way to shift attention from Israel’s plans to complete the takeover of Arab lands. Coupled with the discriminatory policies Israeli implements, these land takeovers have led to the impoverishment of the Arab citizens.

The Israeli ruling coalition’s campaign to restrict Arab representation in the Knesset has deepened the Arab citizen’s distrust in the electoral process. In the last two rounds of elections in 2006 and 2009, the percentage of Arab voters dropped, from 90 percent at its peak and an average of 78 percent up until 1999 – to 56 percent. It is expected to drop further in light the ongoing and rapid shift of Israeli politics and society to the extreme right. Like in 2001 – after the incidents of October 2000, where 13 Arab citizens of Israel were killed in demonstrations – more and more voices call to boycott elections.

There are two reasons behind this call. First, if they vote, the Arabs legitimize Israel’s ethnic democracy, which systematically exclude them. Second, voting slows or curbs the prospects of real mass struggle. Those who call for a boycott hold that hostile plans by Jewish Israeli politicians against Arab leaders are being drawn up, and they believe that in a few years, a new and harsher reality will emerge. This reality – which could entail separated and besieged ghettos, poverty, violence and social fragmentation – could lead to wide internal civil unrest.

The Arab region is boiling, and revolutions are in the making. Palestinians inside and outside Israel are watching these upheavals closely.

The international community began only recently to shift some of its attention to the plight of the Arab citizens of Israel. It tended to praise Israel as the only democracy in the Middle East, despite the fact that 20 percent of the state’s citizens are being rapidly stripped of their basic rights.

In his 2003 book, Sleeping on a Wire: Conversations with Palestinians in Israel, Israeli writer David Grossman wondered, “How long can a relatively large minority be assumed by the majority to be an enemy without in the end actually turning them into one?”

He continues: “Slowly and steadily, as if slumbering, Israel is missing its chance to rescue itself from a horrible mistake. It is creating for itself the enemy it will run up against after other countries have made their peace with it.”

Awad Abdelfattah is the secretary general of Balad, which holds three seats in the current Knesset.

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article

    * Required


    1. AIG

      Highly unlikely. Israeli Arabs will more likely look around them, see the dismal state of Egypt and Syria and decide that violence is not the way forward. Unlike many citizens of other Arab countries, Israeli Arabs have a lot to lose.

      As for their lower voting percentage. I think it is a wake up call for the Arab parties in Israel. Perhaps their positions are not in sync with the Arab public.

      Reply to Comment
    2. Aaron the Fascist Troll

      My impression is that Arab political leaders started spicing up their rhetoric way before this recent anti-democratic stuff. Seems to me it really started back in the late 1990s.
      David Grossman was quoted approvingly here. I wonder what left-Zionists like Grossman would do to keep “creating for itself the enemy” of Arab Israelis. Would he give them a really nice, considerate Jewish nation-state to live in, with plenty of civil rights and a really nice, considerate Jewish Staatvolk gently ruling over them? Will that satisfy their demands? If not, then what will he do to keep from “creating” an enemy out of them?
      Arab Israelis are perceived as an enemy because they *are* an enemy. This article itself illustrates that. (Of course the reverse is true as well: Jews are the enemy of Israeli Arabs.) We should nevertheless try to get along and try not to be enemies anymore—at the same time we’re each trying to win, of course. Maybe someday Israeli Jews and Arabs won’t be enemies. Not anytime soon, though. Unfortunately, it’s more likely to go the other way: Arab Israelis will become more powerful due to demographics, with their increased power they’ll become more radical, and that will further alienate Jewish Israelis. So I see greater polarization in the future, not less. But I don’t have a crystal ball.

      Reply to Comment
    3. Aaron the Fascist Troll

      Another typo, sorry: should have been “…to keep FROM `creating for itself the enemy’….”

      Reply to Comment
    4. Bill Pearlman

      They are a scurity threat. A crime problem. And an economic anchor. Other then that, whats the problem

      Reply to Comment
    5. Bill Pearlman


      Reply to Comment
    6. Jazzy

      “basic rights”…hmmm, I think the ‘rights’ discourse has taken the anti-Zionists about as far as its gonna – that is, not far.

      Reply to Comment
    7. Lauren

      What I always find interesting is that Israel calls everyone who disagrees with them “enemy”. Everything is about violence against innocent civilians who have not threatened anyone under the guise of “self-defense”!!! Maybe Israel is the major problem in the ME. Maybe, just maybe, if Israel tried to work out the problems instead of insulting and threatening war, the ME could calm down.
      No matter how Israel plays it….. Americans are tired of the lies and the endless blood shed and tax dollars for Israel to kill others. We are not here to serve Israel.
      The lies about Iran are the same lies Israel has told about Iraq, Syria, Egypt and other neighbors. Americans are waking up and it will harder and harder for Israel to continue to steal from us then spit in our faces.
      If you disagree then consider me an enemy and tons of other Americans not bought by AIPAC and Israel. You have NO RIGHT to security when to spend your time making everyone less safe and secure….. such as the US.

      Reply to Comment
    8. AIG


      Let’s be fair. Some are what you say, but many are not. Very few are a security threat or involved in crime. As for the economics side, there a generalization is more warranted, the main problem being lack of participation of women in the workforce and the relative isolation and distance from the center.

      Just like the Haredi economic problem can be solved, so can the Arab one, as long as the Arab leaders are smart enough to keep violence and extreme discourse at bay.

      Reply to Comment
    9. directrob

      “Arab Israelis are perceived as an enemy because they *are* an enemy”
      “They are a scurity threat. A crime problem. And an economic anchor”
      “as long as the Arab leaders are smart enough to keep violence and extreme discourse at bay.”
      In my book these comments are racist, the first two even a criminal offense.

      Reply to Comment
    10. Aaron the Fascist Troll

      DirectRob, you forgot to quote another racist, criminal sentence of mine that’s just as bad: “Jews are the enemy of Israeli Arabs.” So I’m an anti-Semite, too.

      Reply to Comment
    11. directrob

      Yes that one was just as bad, but it does not make you anti Semite (or anti Arab), but the statement that Israeli Jews and Israeli Arabs ennemies (by birth!!) is utterly racist.

      Reply to Comment
    12. Aaron the Fascist Troll

      I think you might have misunderstood me. I was talking about collectives, not individuals. More precisely: the people Israel and the Palestinian people are enemies. Not by birth! And it certainly doesn’t mean that every Jew is personally the enemy of every Palestinian.
      Analogously, the US and USSR were enemies, as collectives (states). Again, not by birth.

      Reply to Comment
    13. directrob

      Aaron, you now write something entirely different, “People Israel” and “Palestinian people”. These groups are not even disjunct.

      Reply to Comment
    14. Aaron the Fascist Troll

      “The people Israel” is a common translation of עם ישראל, also called the nation of Israel or the Jewish people. Not to be confused with the State of Israel, of course. So the people Israel and the Palestinian people are disjunct.
      If you don’t buy that the Jewish people is an enemy of the Palestinian people (which is how I see it), it’s just as relevant here that Israeli Jews are an enemy of Palestinians. Again, to emphasize, that’s collectively, publicly: it doesn’t follow that any private persons are enemies.

      Reply to Comment
    15. Piotr Berman

      “Arab Israelis are perceived as an enemy because they *are* an enemy. This article itself illustrates that.”

      Actually, how? Because it does not praise multicultural accomplishments of the State? Same kind of thinking leads to calling Haneen Zoabi, Muhammand Bakri and Ewa Jasiewicz “terrorists”. The last is a British citizen who was deported on that basis. Disagreement is not “terrorism” or “being enemy”.

      Reply to Comment
    16. directrob

      Aaron, the Israeli state surely acts like it is at war with all people that claim a Palestinian identity. That is very very bad. Your claim that as a group people that claim an “Israeli Jewish” identity are ennemies of the group “Palestinian” Israeli is impossible. You might claim that “some” or “the majority of” thinks like that but not the group because that reduces individuals to a Jewish group and that is against their human rights.

      Reply to Comment
    17. Steve

      Israel, a Jewish-majority state, exists. This still angers and frustrates various hatemongers.

      Reply to Comment
    18. phil


      Yet another irrelevant comment unrelated to the article at hand..

      Ooops.. does typing this make me an anti-semite?

      (just anticipating your auto-reponse)

      Reply to Comment
    19. Ben

      It would be nice if anything in your post had anything to do with anything in this article (ironically, it’s written by someone whose general views seem like they could easily be in accord with yours, and you basically pissed all over him by not using your “analytical skills” to back up what he wrote). As for Israeli Arabs, my view is very, very simple: if you don’t want to be treated as a 5th column, don’t act like one, and if you don’t want that treatment to be harsh, don’t lie your ass off and then alternate between conspiracy-mongering and threatening unexplained + unprecedented levels of violence.

      Reply to Comment