+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

Reporting in the line of duty

Channel 10’s veteran military analyst rides along with a unit that goes undercover as Palestinians, taking a shot at embedded reporting. The result has very little to do with journalism.

By Nir Gontarz

Channel 10 military reporter Alon Ben-David. The subtitle reads: 'A feeling of control, absolute control.' (Screenshot)

Channel 10 military reporter Alon Ben-David. The subtitle reads: ‘A feeling of control, absolute control.’ (Screenshot)

Television journalists generally bring a videographer with them when they report from the field. Embarrassingly enough, the person who filmed veteran reporter Alon Ben-David’s recent report on Channel 10 about Border Police who go undercover as Palestinians (“Mistaravim” in Hebrew) was actually a cameraman from the Israel Police’s spokesperson’s unit.

When a journalist goes on a paid junket or any assignment that is sponsored and organized by an entity that is not his or her news outlet, it’s customary to disclose the arrangement to the reader or viewer. It’s called full disclosure, something along the lines of: “The reporter has been a guest of Toyota Israel,” or “The reporter has been a guest of the Georgian Foreign Ministry.”

Ben-David should have disclosed to his viewers that he was a guest of the police spokesperson, and if any restrictions were placed on him — to disclose them, too. For instance, did he commit to not asking his interviewees challenging questions that might, perhaps, bring up ethical or moral issues? And if no restrictions were imposed on him, why did he nonetheless choose not to make any disclosure?

Ben-David — a news presenter and military and security analyst – made a downright promotional piece, in which he painted a completely one-sided picture, devoid of any journalistic content. The veteran reporter, who never stopped flattering the arrest raid and assassination unit, chose not to ask the soldiers what it feels like to make extrajudicial arrests of civilians, or to break into a family home in the middle of the night based on shady information.

Under the cover of darkness, Ben-David accompanied the “Mistaravim” on an arrest raid, which we don’t know why they carried out, and in which as far as we can tell from the footage, the “undercover” officers showed up at the site of the arrest dressed in full uniforms — and not in civilian attire. After blowing off the front door of the home, the disabled suspect is arrested and put into a car. Ben-David doesn’t feel the need to tell his viewers what evidence emanated from the suspect’s interrogation, whether he was brought before a judge, whether his remand was extended, whether he was indicted, and if so, for what crime.

Ben-David equally refrains from asking the “Mistaravim” about the psychological price that they pay — and will pay — as a result of their service. Apparently he didn’t watch his colleague Or Heller’s television documentary, in which he found that the vast majority of people who serve in similar units suffer from psychological disorders after completing their service.

The Israel Police and Border Police spokespersons got a great deal: instead of producing a public relations video on their own dime, they invited Ben-David — or responded to his request — to make a film about them, for free and on prime-time television. The truth is that in his item, which was mistakenly categorized as a journalistic endeavor, Ben-David is entirely extraneous. His input as a journalist, had there been any, passed unnoticed.

More and more often, our television screens are filled with such high production-value items with no journalistic content whatsoever. They call them military reporters. There is no more problematic area of journalistic coverage in Israel than the defense establishment. Military reporters and analysts are entirely dependent on the subjects of their reporting and are entirely unable to criticize them, as is customary in every other area of journalism. Members of Knesset, ministers in the government and heads of other large public institutions would kill for even a pinch of the sympathy military reporters shower on the security establishment and its spokespeople.

The viewer doesn’t learn anything from Ben-David’s “news” item, certainly not anything new. Maybe only that even a veteran reporter like Alon Ben-David can fall deep into the traps set by military and police spokespeople.

This article first appeared in Hebrew on The 7th Eye website.

Newsletter banner

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article

    * Required


    1. Pedro X

      “he painted a completely one-sided picture, devoid of any journalistic content.”

      972mag does this every day of the year. 972mag day in day out never provides a balanced picture. This piece is no different.

      Reply to Comment
      • Ben

        I think the equivalence you draw is false. You’ve got the equation inverted. +972 provides real information and analysis shorn of propaganda. Channel 10 provided here pure propaganda shorn of any real information and analysis. (And it’s not a matter of “balance” of propaganda items and talking points which reminds me of the characterization of the USA as an “even-handed” third party but which is anything but. It’s a matter of honest analysis and documentation.) This is why +972 is so valuable and pretty unique If this distresses you you could always stop reading it instead of being the avid but constantly carping and complaining reader you are. After all, if it’s such trash, why bother? No one complains about the National Enquirer because everyone is in on the joke and knows it’s trash. What really bothers you I think is that +972 provides, in English!, to the outside world!, with remarkable honesty and accuracy and documentation, the real deal. As does Haaretz in its way. (This by the way is also what truly bothers the one or two jackass trolls who harass people here with completely asinine drivel. They hate the fact that non-Israeli non-Hebrew speakers are privy to the inside dope, the real deal, but they have no coherent answer so they just try, fruitlessly, to distract. It is also what truly bothers the Whataboutery Brigade that is always sallying forth hereabouts.)

        Reply to Comment