+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

Putting a halt to the 'assembly line' of Palestinian prisoners

Rather than arguing over the ‘gestures’ of releasing long-term prisoners, Israel must use restraint during arrests in the West Bank, while ensuring fair and swift procedures in the military courts.

(Translated by Ofer Neiman)

One of the main factors behind the failure of the recent round of Israeli-Palestinian talks was Israel’s decision to cancel the release of 26 Palestinian prisoners, which had been agreed upon as a goodwill gesture to the Palestinian Authority. The issue of prisoner release, whether in the framework of negotiations or in the framework of prisoner exchange deals, touches on very strong sentiments on both sides. For the Palestinians, the prisoners are members of their own people being held by a foreign occupier. For many Israelis, the prisoners are “bad people,” responsible for killing and injuring Israeli soldiers and Jewish citizens.

Illustrative photo of Palestinian prisoners in an Israeli military prison (By ChameleonsEye / Shutterstock.com)

Illustrative photo of Palestinian prisoners in an Israeli military prison (By ChameleonsEye / Shutterstock.com)

The release of prisoners, perceived by one side as the redemption of captives, is perceived by the other as gross injustice and even as a threat to one’s life. Accordingly, Palestinians have regarded the cancellation as sufficient grounds for terminating the talks; while in Israel previous rounds of prisoner release have brought about waves of protest and condemnation, culminating in a controversial bill aimed at preempting the future release of prisoners sentenced to life imprisonment.

Criminalizing an entire people

Negotiations on the issue of Palestinian prisoners tend to focus on a certain group of prisoners – those sentenced to lengthy terms, usually on the basis of convictions of grievous violence (the validity of these convictions and/or the gravity of the offenses are a bone of contention). All 78 prisoners released so far as part of gestures for the promotion of the talks in 2013 – 2014 belonged to this group (and the same holds for the 26 whose release was cancelled). Of 1,027 prisoners released as part of the Gilad Shalit deal in 2011, 434 had been sentenced to at least 20 years (including 275 cases of life imprisonment) – and this group was the focus of negotiations between Israel and Hamas.

Focusing on the aforementioned prisoners is only natural. They are the ones who have spent, or are expected to spend, a long period behind bars. They are also those who have been convicted by Israel’s military justice system of what it sees as grave offenses.

IN PHOTOS: Palestinian prisoners, supporters struggle for freedom

However, one should recall that this group is only a minority among Palestinian prisoners at large. According to the Palestinian NGO Addameer, the group numbers less than 1,000 prisoners out of a total of nearly 5,000. Fifteen or 10 years in prison is surely a long period, but even if one were to lower the bar, those same prisoners who have been sentenced to long terms will still constitute a minority. This follows from data (albeit not up to date) published by The Israeli Prison Service in 2007. According to the data, two thirds of the prisoners were sentenced to terms of no more than seven years.

Freed Palestinian prisoner Khaled Al-Azraq greets a young family member in their home in Aida Refugee Camp, West Bank, October 30, 2013. (Ryan Rodrick Beiler/Activestills.org)

Freed Palestinian prisoner Khaled Al-Azraq greets a young family member in their home in Aida Refugee Camp, West Bank, October 30, 2013. (Ryan Rodrick Beiler/Activestills.org)

The fact that supporters of the two-state solution (not to mention its opponents) have neglected this second group of prisoners is most disturbing. For every Palestinian sentenced to a lengthy imprisonment, there are, apparently, tens of Palestinians who have served or are serving, shorter terms. Some researchers have argued that a fifth of Palestinian men in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip have spent some time in Israeli prison. Even if the numbers are much lower, they still attest to the criminalization of an entire people.

Secondly, there is good reason to believe that the wider prisoner population ends up in jail due to substantial flaws in the military courts in which they are tried. These flaws are too numerous to list here, but the basic mechanism which they produce is quite evident.

Changing policy: A long-term investment

Palestinians who are indicted on “security” charges (including what is known as “disturbing the peace”) are almost always detained on remand (i.e. until the completion of proceedings). This means that they will spend a year or two in detention until their verdict is given. Their chances of being acquitted then – in the face of a hostile court – are quite slim. Such conditions create a very strong incentive to sign a plea bargain with the prosecution, in exchange for a somewhat reduced sentence, especially since conviction by an Israeli court is significantly less stigmatized in Palestinian society. This dynamic primarily affects those prisoners who are charged with lesser offenses, as they can reach a reasonable plea bargain.

This view is corroborated by data provided by the Israeli Prison Service to B’Tselem, the human rights NGO. According to the data, a third of current prisoners were detained before the court ruled in their case, and nearly all of them were detained on remand. The number of detainees has doubled in the past four years, while the number of prisoners being convicted has declined by one third. This is perhaps the reason why the total number of Palestinian prisoners hardly declined during the same period, despite the relative calm of recent years or the mass release of prisoners as part of the Gilad Shalit deal.

Should Israel use restraint during arrests in the West Bank, while ensuring fair and swift procedures in the military courts, the number of Palestinian prisoners will decrease substantially. This may also make the renewal of peace talks more difficult. The detention of fewer prisoners may lead to the issue becoming less prominent on the Palestinian agenda, and the “reserves” of prisoners who can be released will dwindle. Accordingly, Israel’s ability to implement gestures and deals while using this bargaining chip, as well as the PA’s ability to point out concrete achievements which would justify the continuation of the talks, will be degraded.

This is a classic example of the tension between promoting “peace talks” in the short run and laying the foundation for real justice between Israelis and Palestinian in the long run. Those who believe that the conflict will be resolved through a compromise between the elites, which need only gather sufficient strength to appease their public opinion, will continue to focus on “gestures” of prisoner release, while ignoring the production line for new prisoners. By contrast, those who believe that a true deal can only come about as a gradual process of changing reality for both peoples should focus their efforts on tackling the root of the wider problem.

This this post in Hebrew on Local Call.

Turning over a new leaf: An interview with a former Palestinian ‘security prisoner’
PHOTOS: Palestinian prisoners, supporters struggle for freedom

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article

    * Required


    1. Philos

      I’m not sure if the military courts need to get any more swifter than they already are…

      The entire problem with this thesis can be summed up in one sentence: the problem is the military courts

      Reply to Comment
    2. directrob

      ” those who believe that a true deal can only come about as a gradual process …”

      are ignoring that the Israeli state is annexing land, resources and property. (inside and outside 48 borders)

      Reply to Comment
    3. Rab

      1. Does the author believe there is a correlation between the number of prisoners and the relative decline in attempted terror attacks?

      2. Even if some prisoners are supposed to serve prison sentences of 5-7 years, the fact is that they were captured, given trial and convicted. They are criminals and it doesn’t matter that the “other side” thinks their crimes are unfair. Would you release Katzav from prison because his wife doesn’t believe he committed crimes?

      3. There is an unspoken truth here. Namely, it is that Israel is protecting the PA (and itself to some degree) from Hamas by ensuring that this terror group remains weak in Judea and Samaria. I would wager that some of the unconvicted detainees belong to this group. While the PA may yell about these prisoners, they want them to stay exactly where they are. Israel is a subcontractor. Also, read my first point again and you’ll see there may be a greater good.

      4. What mechanisms do you have to enforce the law if prison time isn’t one of them? I know the Palestinians are a peace-loving people, but if an Issawiyah young man steals a car from French Hill, he should go to prison. And, if he starts a fire to protest whatever restrictions the IDF places on the town because some other young men ambushed an Israeli car that entered the town accidentally, then he and his friends should be held in prison, even if their families and friends don’t agree.

      5. Early release for political deals encourages crime and violence.

      Reply to Comment
      • Philos

        A 98% conviction rate based almost entirely on “confessions” is characteristic of the most brutal and authoritarian “justice systems” around the world.

        Reply to Comment
        • directrob

          Actually if Israeli soldiers are involved military courts do a much worse job (James Miller, Tom Hurndall, Iman Darweesh Al Hams). That is all the more remarkable because most cases never see a court or are not even investigated, one should think the court gets the most obvious cases.

          Reply to Comment
        • Rab

          The USA has a 97% conviction rate. And they’re not surrounded by enemies.


          You do realize that the guy who was arrested today with the suicide bombing belt is one of the folks that in this article is considered a person who should be released because the other side doesn’t view him as a criminal?

          Reply to Comment
          • Rab

            Actually, I’d say the US system is in far worse shape. Unlike Israel, it is not dealing with an existential and security oriented conflict with neighbors who are under military rule. The Israeli system may be in bad shape, but I fail to see how. This article doesn’t demonstrate anything and nobody here is presenting any semblance of an argument that people are arrested and jailed improperly on a consistent basis. I’m sure it happens, because mistakes happen everywhere, but in order to complain, a systemic problem needs to exist. Show me where the problem is…

            Reply to Comment