+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

Netanyahu will have the last word in Washington

Call it a delicate balance of diplomacy, or a dance between two apparently opposing sides.  The Obama Shuffle involves first a sway to the left then a sway to the right, one step forward, then one step back.  And hop, hop, hop hop hop.  And stop.  (Now you try!)

The past 72 hours have shown that the US President is not afraid of engaging in some verbal warfare, depending on who is listening.  While condemning the Nakba Day’s pedestrian infiltration of Israel, he promoted (as Israel views it) a retreat to “indefensible” borders.  While calling for a return to negotiations by both the Israelis and Palestinians, he essentially insulted (again, as Israel views it) the very man he’s hoping to get to negotiate.  (I am sure Israeli linguists are struggling as this very hour to come up with a Hebrew term for “bitch slap.”)

Based on the tit-for-tat word-bombs – let’s paraphrase: ‘Obama doesn’t understand our reality’ from Israeli aides, and ‘Netanyahu doesn’t have the power to make much-needed concessions’ from American aides – I was surprised to hear that Bibi indeed boarded the plane.

It’s all about timing.  Let’s look at the chronology: Nakba Day protests, Mahmoud Abbas writes his New York Times op-ed, Netanyahu responds, Obama gives his foreign policy speech, Netanyahu responds.  Then (in a few hours, as of writing this) the two leaders meet behind closed doors in what is very likely an unfriendly situation, only to emerge smiling and shaking hands.  It can be assumed they will greet the press and express their joint commitment to – and understanding of – what needs to be done.  Then Obama goes AIPAC, then Netanyahu goes to AIPAC.

Note: Obama only days ago confirmed he will speak before AIPAC, essentially upping-the-ante.

Additional note: by the time Netanyahu speaks, the US president will already be in Europe, talking about strengthening NATO and putting missiles in Poland, while trying to calm the Russians.

So ironically, on Washington’s soil, Netanyahu is going to get the last word … and it is going to be in front of two very welcoming crowds: first, the pro-Israel lobby, and then the US Congress.   Netanyahu and his aides knew this, which is why they boarded their flight in Tel Aviv.  Cancelling on the US leader would have thrown down the diplomatic gauntlet – a move they might have considered.  But bailing out on their friends and letting the American president have the last laugh was unthinkable.

Most of those attending AIPAC will likely see more of the Obama Shuffle.  They’ll recall the last time then-Senator Barack Obama spoke before them.  He blasted his main opponent (then-Senator Hillary Clinton, also running for office, and also speaking at AIPAC) for her lack of foreign policy skills … only to then appoint her his top foreign liaison.  This week, at the start of his foreign policy speech, he praised her and suggested she will go down in history as one of America’s greatest secretary of states.

Obama-the-candidate was running for office and promised AIPAC a united Jerusalem as the eternal capital of Israel, a comment that within hours his aides were clarifying.  Obama-the-President is also running for office.  While it is easy to insist Netanyahu essentially take off his shoes before coming in, he will be least comfortable making such demands at AIPAC’s party.  And so the dance will continue, one step to the left, one step to the right, and hop, hop, hop hop hop.

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article

    * Required


    1. max

      The geo-political reality of Israel is defined by its location that is strategic for regional and global powers and its ability to defend itself from its direct neighbors, but not when associated with additional powers.
      That’s why Israel is worried about Iran’s influence and cautious in regard to the changes in Turkey.
      It therefore currently depends on the US for its mid- and long-term survival.
      To keep the US seeing it as an asset, not liability, Israel has to balance its short-term relationship with any government, maintain its broader emotional appeal to the American people and ensure that its defense doesn’t become a burden to the US, that is, ensure that it can continue and defend itself autonomously.
      It seems to me that the evaluation of what the latter part means (risk assessment – ‘Obama doesn’t understand our reality’ – and appetite – ‘Netanyahu doesn’t have the power to make much-needed concessions’) is at the core of the disagreement between the 2 governments.

      Reply to Comment
    2. Too much early talk about potential borders is both a waste of time and intentionally demeaning and degrading to the Jewish People and Israel. First up has to come some real progress with regard to real Arab and Muslim willingness to recognize the legitimacy and permanence of Israel as “the” Jewish State, i.e. as the political expression of the Jewish People in a part of its aboriginal homeland. Second, should comes mechanisms to resolve the long-standing issue of Jewish refugees from Arab lands (circa 850,000) and Arab refugees from the 1948 war (circa 726,000). Third perhaps is the issue of Jerusalem. And, the penultimate issue must be the many detailed security arrangements to ensure that it would be safe for Israel to agree to a new jurisdiction west of the Jordan River. After all these difficult issues have been ventilated, clarified and drafted, the time comes to start addressing the issue of potential borders. Premature reference to borders is probably just a tactic to discredit the Israel government and embarrass USA Jews. And, if those other key issues cannot be solved first, why bother talking about borders? In the absence of any agreement on those other key issues, instead of talking about borders, there should be firm and consistent action with respect to building more Jewish homes, schools, businesses and farms. And, to keep on building at strategic points of the “national home of the Jewish People” from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea. I believe in “peace now!” But, if there is no peace, let us go forward and continue to settle our ancestral homeland.

      Reply to Comment