+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

PLO committee agrees to push for landmark elections

With the Palestinian political horizon looking grim, reconciliation, elections and reform may be the only hope.

News of a major development in Palestinian politics was reached today in Cairo between leaders of various Palestinian factions.

A committee established by the reconciliation agreement signed in May 2011 to advance PLO reform has agreed to push for direct elections to the Palestinian National Council (PNC), the PLO’s parliament and highest legislative body, once polling and a mechanism can be reached. PNC elections, if held, would be a landmark accomplishment for Palestinian politics and pave the way for a representational government including Palestinians everywhere, not merely in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

The move is highly popular among Palestinians, who see the deterioration in the PLO as a significant problem affecting political life. On March 15, 2011, Palestinian youth groups took to the streets in Ramallah calling for PNC elections. A a reconciliation agreement soon followed, signed in Cairo by Fatah and Hamas, along with other smaller factions.

The PNC has traditionally been comprised of appointed representatives from Palestinian political parties, trade and student unions, along with various other Palestinian groups and organizations located around the world. Direct elections to the PNC have never occurred due to the geo-political difficulties involved. Since the PLO and Israel signed the Oslo Agreement in 1993, the PNC has been increasingly marginalized in favor of the PA and barely constitutes a functioning body.

A dire situation

Beyond the headlines, Palestinian politics is in a state of crisis. Despite the achievements on paper, very little has been done on the ground to mend the divisions between Fatah in the West Bank and Hamas in Gaza. Elections to the Palestinian Authority, which were supposed to take place within one year from the May 2011 agreement, have been stalled, with the Central Elections Commission unable to complete voter registration in Gaza. The reconciliation agreement and the prospect of power sharing in the Gaza Strip has exposed rifts within Hamas, as the Gaza-based leadership is clearly unhappy with the arrangement.

The political division and lack of elections to the Palestinian Authority have also created an untenable state where the status and legitimacy of the PA is tied directly to one man – Mahmoud Abbas. Without elections, any successor to Abbas would have no legitimacy to head either the PA or PLO, both of which Abbas currently leads.

This is all amplified by the fact that the current crop of Palestinian leaders enjoys very little popularity among the people, according to recent polls. Abbas and Khaled Meshaal, the political leader of Hamas in Damascus, have both stated they will not run for office in an upcoming election. However, it may be likely that Fatah will pressure Abbas to stay on because his departure could be catastrophic to the party.

The one achievement that Palestinians have put forward over the last few years was a growing economy under the stewardship of Salam Fayyad. Yet, like all things in the Palestinian territories, this is all tied to the occupation and can quickly change. As the political landscape has dimmed, and donor funding from the Arab countries has dried up, the financial crisis within the Palestinian Authority has become increasingly acute. This has caused the PA to increase taxes, a widely unpopular move that had people in the streets once again, and forced the PA to backtrack. If the economic situation deteriorates further, there is no telling how far the consequences will go.

“I think that it is very important for the Palestinian people to see their leaders making progress towards reconciliation and elections, because the continuity of the current situation would weaken the Palestinian position,” says Dr. Ghassan Khatib, the chief spokesman of the Palestinian Authority. “The best way of solving the interim split [between Fatah and Hamas] is through elections.”

Unless reconciliation, elections and reform can be achieved soon, Palestinian politics is headed down a grim and uncertain road.

Because the Palestinian Authority is only an interim government, it is a lot like a bicycle that requires the momentum of the peace process to keep it upright. Right now no one is peddling and the bike is moving simply from the inertia of two decades of existence. If there is no movement soon, it will inevitably tip over.

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article
  • LEAVE A COMMENT

    * Required

    COMMENTS

    1. Richard Witty

      A difficult development for political integrity.

      The reason that I say that is that it dilutes the argument around Israel that it should be a state of all its people, in declaring that the geographic jurisdiction is NOT the appropriate basis of authoritative governance.

      I appreciate the concerns of Palestinian diaspora, refugees and those residing in other parts of the Arab world, Europe and the US.

      Hopefully, the political goal of 67 borders Palestine will remain on the table, and that subsequent governance will be limited to a Palestinian state of all its people, geographically defined (including minorities, but excluding non-citizens).

      Reply to Comment
    2. aristeides

      It seems rather a farce to hold new elections when so many of the persons elected the last time are in Israeli prisons. Does Israel need more prisoners?

      Reply to Comment
    3. Jazzy

      “…including Palestinians everywhere, not merely in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.”
      oooooooo, ominous – your determined opposition to the Zionists’ divide-and-conquer strategy is so persistent, what will they do? I guess they’ll just follow your example and let American Jews vote in Israeli elections. Because democracy usually means roping in non-residents to vote for people who’ll have no authority where the non-resident voters actually live.

      Reply to Comment
    4. Palestinian

      @ Richard , I agree but without giving up our right of return.

      Reply to Comment
    5. This is excellent news. Because out of elections, you can get a representative government. And once you have a representative government, then you can have a government that functions in terms of the people’s needs; including security forces that are not draconian pushing the agenda of a few elite, and providing real justice in the Palestinian run territories. Plus an central organizing force for non-violent demonstrations against the Israeli government, and rational discussions with the Israeli government, and appeals to the rest of the world. And why can’t someone run from Israeli prison’s?

      Jazzy, I can’t tell if you are just a trouble maker, or unaware. Most Jews outside Israel never lived in Israel. Most Palestinians outside Palestine would live there if they could, but were chased out by the Israeli security forces; and so are bonafide citizens of Palestine. All country allow citizens to vote from any where in the world.

      Reply to Comment
    6. Steve

      Permanent peace will never come until the Palestinian leadership (with support from the Palestinian majority) seek a permanent peace with Israel and stop trying to erase Israel’s existence (via one-state “solutions,” fake rights of return, violent means, etc).

      Reply to Comment
    7. Piotr Berman

      “And why cannot someone run from Israeli prison?”

      They can be elected, but later there are problem with parliamentary quorums etc.

      Of course, some Palestinian group could learn to look and speak like militant settlers, walk into a military post (shouting and throwing stones to be less suspicious) and take over. Then PLO could negotiate exchange of prisoners.

      Reply to Comment
    8. Ayyosha

      @Steve: same applies to the other side…

      Reply to Comment
    9. sh

      @Warren Metzler – “All country allow citizens to vote from any where in the world.”
      They don’t. A few examples: British subject’s right to vote expires after 15 years abroad, Ireland doesn’t allow expat voting, India doesn’t, nor does South Africa. Come to think of it, last time I checked Israel didn’t either. There was a proposal to change this a few years ago, but I don’t think it passed.

      Reply to Comment
    10. sh

      As far as participation in elections is concerned, what’s the story for Palestinians with Israeli citizenship?

      Reply to Comment