Appreciate this article? +972 depends on your support.

Click here to help us keep going

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

Peace Now wants to collaborate with Lieberman

This, at any rate, is the headline of a small story by reporter Itamar Eichner in today’s Yedioth Ahronoth. Translation first, comments second:

An extraordinary meeting, the first such meeting of the Lieberman era, took place some days ago at the Foreign Ministry in Jerusalem, when Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon met behind closed doors with a delegation of senior officials of the Peace Now movement.

At the meeting, which was initiated by Peace Now, the activists asked Ayalon if the Foreign Ministry could cooperate with Leftist circles in its hasbara [public information] efforts in Israel and abroad – in a bid to present Israel as a pluralist country that allows for a variety of opinion.

During the meeting the organisation delegates suggest to Ayalon a number of possibilities for including the Left in hasbara efforts, including sending Peace Now delegates to lecture abroad on behalf of the Foreign Ministry. “Often it’s actually the voices coming from the Left that have a better chance of improving Israel’s standing in the world than speakers from the right,” Peace Now secretary-general Yariv Oppenheimer told Ayalon.

Openheimer explained Yedioth Ahronoth yesterday that “although the foreign ministry has a political minister, this minister has a state duty to represent Israel in all of its variety.”

“We have no intention to become spokesmen for Lieberman. We will continue attacking his policies. But we believe the foreign ministry has an interest to encourage those other voices to be heard around the world,” Oppenheimer said.

Ayalon promised Peace Now to take a positive look at their request. “I welcome the real and important dialogue between all parts of society and all Zionist organisations. Peace Now defines itself as a Zionist organisation, and as such I see no problem in them cooperating with the Foreign Ministry.”

And if this wasn’t enough, B’tselem director Jessica Montell met with foreign ministry officials and discussed possibilities for cooperation. Montell had met with foreign ministry officials before, but this was the first such meeting since Lieberman took office.

B’tselem spokeswoman Sarit Michaeli wrote today in response to bewildered activists:

“Btselem’s director-general met recently with officials from the international organisations desk and from the international law and human rights department to discuss two issues B’tselem is concerned with: Administrative arrests [detention without trial], and the legal definition of the situation in the West Bank as “armed conflict.” We explained to the officials why putting limits on the administrative arrests practice and matching the legal definition to the actual situation in the West Bank are key Israeli interests, and asked them to bring up these issues in their work within the system. Yediot Ahronoth reported the meetings in the same story but Btselem obviously has nothing to do with the meeting between Peace Now and Danny Ayalon.

I think Michaeli’s response makes for a good illustration of the differences between the practices of B’tselem and the Tel Aviv leadership of Peace Now  (the distinction is made so as not to throw the American Peace Now or the settlements Task Force of the movement into the same pot as Oppenheimer). B’tselem met with civil servants to get the government to change an oppressive practice by the state; Peace Now met with ultra-right, bellicose, hot-headed Danny “Low Chair” Ayalon to offer their help in pretending the state wasn’t that oppressive in the first place. Peace Now rather clumsily tried to play on Israel’s fixation with appearances, but ended up just joining the game themselves.

Apart from providing us with a textbook example of how a centrist movement gets appropriated by the very forces it’s meant to fight, it seems to me this escapade does very poor service to the important work of others, less limelight hungry Peace Now members. It is also likely to do considerable damage to the movement in the long run.

For additional original analysis and breaking news, visit +972 Magazine's Facebook page or follow us on Twitter. Our newsletter features a comprehensive round-up of the week's events. Sign up here.

View article: AAA
Share article
Print article

    * Required


    1. ronnie

      “the distinction is made so as not to throw the American Peace Now or the settlements Task Force of the movement into the same pot as Oppenheimer” – please explain the difference because i fail to notice them, between the different branches of the Piss Now. Oppenheimer is much more representative than you may think but in any case, everything this movement stands for is vile.

      Reply to Comment
    2. Remember Yossi Beilin’s herring breakfasts with Lieberman a while ago? That really improved Beilin’s position on the political scene, didn’t it? Wonder if it also had anything to do with Meretz’ current state of non-play? Way back in the 50s there was some commission that recommended setting up an Israeli peace party and getting it run by the Shabbak. Whenever I think about that, it makes me wonder…nuff said.

      Reply to Comment
    3. I do not want to refer to Oppenheimer’s reasons for the current steps of Peace Now. I do not know him personally. However, it seems to me that attempts by liberals to work within the administrations of the damned have never yielded positive results.
      The manipulation of one side by the other always leaves the more rational side worse off than before.

      Reply to Comment
© 2010 - 2017 +972 Magazine
Follow Us

+972 is an independent, blog-based web magazine. It was launched in August 2010, resulting from a merger of a number of popular English-language blogs dealing with life and politics in Israel and Palestine.

Website powered by RSVP

Illustrations: Eran Mendel