+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

Palestinian textbook case closed, but more trumped-up Israeli charges expected

This week’s publication of a U.S.-funded study cleared the Palestinians of charges that their schoolbooks ‘demonize’ Israel. This was not, however, the first hoop they’ve been made to jump through, and it won’t be the last.

The Israeli and U.S. Jewish establishment reaction to the terrible news that the Palestinians don’t demonize Jews in their textbooks reminded me of the long-forgotten uproar over the Palestinian Covenant.  Same bullshit. The stout-hearted nationalist Jews in the U.S. and Israel were saying in unison, “How can we ever trust the Palestinians to make peace when their covenant talks about ”liberating all of Palestine’?” And they made this their cause celebre – they lobbied Congress, they lobbied Clinton (this was in the mid-to-late 1990s), and Clinton pressured Arafat, until finally Arafat convened the relevant PLO council and they voted to take out the offending phrases. Clinton even went to Gaza at the end of 1998 for the historic event. He told the assembly: “You have sent, I say again, a powerful message not to the government, but to the people of Israel. You will touch people on the street there. You will reach their hearts there.”

I loved that. Nobody in Israel, no Jew on earth gave a good goddamn that they changed the Palestinian Covenant. But then none of them cared about the original “liberating all of Palestine” Palestinian Covenant, either. As soon as the vote in Gaza to amend it was finally taken, the whole issue vanished for the Israeli and American Jewish right as if it had never existed. This particular orange had been squeezed dry, and now it was time to move on – to find another issue over which to put the Palestinians on the defensive, to keep the world’s flashlight in their eyes and not in Israel’s, to find another hoop for them to jump through before Israel might be asked to slow the occupation train down just a tad.

So it is with the Palestinian textbooks. All this supposed distress over what the Palestinians are teaching their children about Israel and the Jews, this insistence that they clean up their textbooks as a condition for “peace”  – it’s another one of the old “stop Oslo” ploys of the Israeli and American Jewish right. A bunch of right-wing propagandists like Itamar Marcus and Palestinian Media Watch have been harping on all this “demonization” in Palestinian textbooks, and the intended effect, of course, has been to discredit Mahmoud Abbas and the Palestinian Authority, to blacken the Palestinians’ name and thus make it harder for them to get Israel off their neck. And that’s what’s happened – right-wing Zionists everywhere who of course don’t know a word of Arabic have been hammering away at the Palestinian textbooks for nearly two decades, saying there can be no peace until those books are scrubbed good and thorough. Do right-wing Zionists want peace? No, they want the Palestinians to keep scrubbing.

But this week a three-year study of Palestinian and Israeli textbooks came out, backed by a $590,000 U.S. State Department grant and billed credibly by its authors as being “among the most comprehensive, fact-based investigations ever done of school textbooks.” It found that while neither side exactly educates its kids for peace, they don’t demonize or vilify the other side, either, except in “very rare” cases.

“Academic study weakens Israeli claim that Palestinian school texts teach hate,” wrote the New York Times. “New textbook study threatens to undercut argument that Palestinian schools preach hate,” wrote the Jewish Telegraphic Agency. Oh no, what will we do? Maybe we can Goldstone these professors. “Whitewashing incitement,” said the Strategic Affairs Ministry. “Maliciously slandering the Israeli educational system and the State of Israel,” said the Education Ministry. “Distorted and counterproductive,” said Abe Foxman, a liberal compared to most other American Jewish machers. 

If these people were really concerned about demonization of Israel in Palestinian schoolbooks as an obstacle to peace, they would take the findings of the study as wonderful news – hey, we were worried for nothing, it’s not a problem, let’s make peace! Just like they might have taken the changing of the Palestinian Covenant as great news.

Or like they might have welcomed the PLO’s recognition of Israel 25 years ago, which answered their long-standing No. 1 demand for proof of the Palestinians’ good intentions.

Or like they might be convinced by the PA’s fight against terror under Abbas, which has been their No. 1 demand for the last 25 years.

But no. There is literally nothing the Palestinians can or ever could do to satisfy the demands of the Israeli and American Jewish right – which now have a lock on power – because these are not demands made with an eye toward peace, they’re weapons in an information war to keep the Palestinians down. If the Palestinians recognize Israel, they’ll be told they have to recognize Israel as a Jewish state. If they fight terror, they’ll be told they now have to fight incitement. If they amend the Palestinian Covenant, they’ll be met with blank stares. And if they turn out not to be demonizing Israel in their schoolbooks, they’ll be told that yes they are, and even if they’re not, they’re demonizing Israel somewhere else. If this orange has been squeezed dry, not to worry – there are plenty more oranges where that came from.

Yet another litmus test for the Palestinians was exposed this week as a cynical fraud. Now, moving right along, what are these conditions (four of them, I believe) that Hamas has to meet before Israel will agree to negotiate with them? Same bullshit.

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article

    * Required


    1. Henry

      Wow — that JTA story is creepy —

      “…some conclusions that already are making some Israeli government officials very unhappy: Palestinian textbooks do not have as much anti-Israel incitement as often portrayed.”

      I mean, here you have ‘the definitive source for American Jewish community news and opinion’ stating openly the fact that there are Israeli government officials who would be *happier* if it had been determined that Palestinian textbooks were teaching their kids to hate Israel and Jews. That’s *sick*.

      I’ve gotten pretty jaded recently. This made my head spin.

      Reply to Comment
    2. Richard Lightbown

      Nice post Larry, but we shouldn’t get too complacent. It will be interesting to see if the relative ministries of education follow up on the recommendations given in the report, and especially whether anything will be done to change Ultra-Orthodox education.But I have to admit the Israeli state school books scored a lot higher than I was ever expecting. Call that a begrudging compliment.

      Reply to Comment
    3. aristeides

      The true meaning of a “meme” is an idea that takes on a life of its own, replicating and propagating itself. The Palestinian textbook canard is such a meme.

      Reading the comments on this site is an excellent illustration of the way people keep replicating and propagating false information because it fits into their ideological mindset. I’m very sure that Derfner is right here, and the meme will survive the truth.

      Reply to Comment
      • Duh

        You are the meme, yourself. A laughing stock to yourself who refuses to accept reality.

        Reply to Comment
        • Y-Man

          (In childish taunting voice) No you’re the meme!

          Reply to Comment
    4. Masoud Jayazeri

      Now it is time to investigate zionist textbooks. These are poisonous textbooks that expose children to a fraudulent zionist narrative of having actual history in the land. The zionists have as much historical claim to Palestine as they to do Peru or Palau

      Reply to Comment
    5. One doesn’t have to make peace with someone who thinks as yourself.

      Peace comes through difference.

      Reply to Comment
    6. directrob

      The Hasbara formula here is very easy …

      Accuse your opponent of ten times as much as what you see in the mirror.

      Reply to Comment
    7. The report is actually more complicated. I heard today the authors of the study today (Friday) on The Brian Lehrer Show at WNYC (New York City’s NPR). The authors shot down the claim that Palestinian textbooks call explicitly for violence. But the did claim that the Palestinian textbooks do not teach the narrative of “the other side,” and that Israeli state secular schools do a better job at that and are more self-critical, in contrast to Haredi schools.

      Reply to Comment
      • directrob

        The problem the Palestinian books have is that history has been unkind to Palestinians. A neutral description of history at some points will always have to be negative about Israel. The same passge in an Israeli book would be called self criical.

        “After the 1967 war, the Israeli Military Authority assumed control over the Palestinian education system. [ … ] . School development and teacher training were very limited, and textbooks became outdated.”

        Reply to Comment