+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

Palestinian reconciliation could work this time. Israel must support it

The current Palestinian reconciliation agreement looks like it could actually hold, largely due to regional and internal changes over the past few years. What does this bode for the peace process? A former minister in the Palestinian government explains.

By Ashraf al-Ajrami

Hamas Chief Ismail Haniyeh speaks to the press upon his arrival at the Rafah border crossing from the Egyptian side following reconciliation talks with Fatah mediated by Egyptian intelligence, Gaza Strip, September 19, 2017. (Abed Rahim Khatib/ Flash90)

Hamas Chief Ismail Haniyeh speaks to the press upon his arrival at the Rafah border crossing from the Egyptian side following reconciliation talks with Fatah mediated by Egyptian intelligence, Gaza Strip, September 19, 2017. (Abed Rahim Khatib/ Flash90)

This is not the first time the two large Palestinian political movements, Fatah and Hamas, have come to a reconciliation agreement. There is a great deal of skepticism about whether it will succeed, particularly following the failure of previous reconciliation agreements. However, many feel that this time the two parties are serious, and success is possible.

This is based on a number of reasons, first and foremost the recent change in Hamas’ leadership. In its most recent internal elections, the movement chose a young leadership composed of charismatic and influential figures, among them several who spent time in Israeli prisons, like Yahya Sinwar, who was elected to party’s top post in Gaza. One of the first things the new leadership did was to take a hard look at reality in the Gaza Strip. It came to the conclusion that the Hamas regime has failed: living conditions are impossible; the situation cannot last much longer and may even end in conflagration. These leaders have a patriotic and pragmatic way of thinking vis-a-vis the population of Gaza.

Moreover, the situation in the Arab world has changed dramatically following what was deemed the “Arab Spring.” The rise and fall of political Islam was followed by the demise of the Muslim Brotherhood’s regime in Egypt, the failure of the Ennahda in Tunisia, and the developments in Syria following the victory of Bashar al-Assad and his allies, Russia and Iran.

Hamas agrees to two states

The regional problems have an influence on the states who supported radical Islamist groups in Syria and other places (such as Egypt) — first and foremost Qatar. Furthermore, Turkey has its issues with the United States, the Kurds, and with the EU, the latter of which refuses to allow it into the union. The dominant axis in the region is currently led by Egypt, the Emirates, and Saudi Arabia, with Egypt playing a significant role.

Donald Trump’s ascent to the White House is yet another change on the international stage. The American president will not reconcile with political Islam, nor will he try to form an alliance with Islamist movements, as the Obama administration did. On the contrary, he views these movements as enemies that must be fought, and it seems he will support regimes that go to war against them. During his visit to Riyadh, Trump named four organizations on his terrorism list, Hamas among them. This was probably enough for the movement to re-think the issue of international legitimacy. The international legitimacy it craves can only be achieved through the Palestinian leadership, led by President Mahmoud Abbas, as well the moderate currents of the Arab world, and with the consent of the United States.

U.S. President Donald Trump with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas during a welcome ceremony in the West Bank city of Bethlehem, on May 23, 2017. (Flash90)

U.S. President Donald Trump with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas during a welcome ceremony in the West Bank city of Bethlehem, on May 23, 2017. (Flash90)

Hamas likely made a strategic decision to let the Palestinian Authority rule the Strip. It seeks to maintain its power on the sidelines without interfering with the ruling powers, while upholding the interests of its civil servants — an issue that is to be resolved by a new committee. The decision was made based on Hamas’ failure in Gaza, and the movement’s concern that the situation will explode. This is why many believe reconciliation will work this time. The Hamas leadership’s flexibility during talks in Cairo show that the movement has unequivocally accepted this decision, despite the latent skepticism left over from previous failed attempts at reconciliation.

Palestinian reconciliation can do much to move the peace process along — if Israel decides to advance toward a deal and end the conflict based on two states along pre-1967 borders, that is. The Israeli government constantly uses the inter-Palestinian split as an excuse not to move forward on negotiations. It claims that President Abbas does not represent all Palestinians, and it argues that Israel cannot withdraw from the West Bank due to the possibility of a Hamas takeover, which would endanger Israeli security.

Now there is a reconciliation process, specifically around a general agreement on the establishment of a Palestinian state along pre-1967 borders. Hamas has signed on to that — to the two-state solution. If the Israeli government supports a peace process based on two states, it must support Palestinian reconciliation and returning the PA to Gaza — it cannot just remain silent or make negative statements that cast doubt on the value of the process just because it is worried about what the U.S. and Egypt might think. Any positive development on this issue must be praised, and we should not gamble on its failure or try to torpedo the process.

Ashraf al-Ajrami was the minister of prisoners affairs for the Palestinian Authority between 2007 and 2009. This post was first published in Hebrew on Local Call. Read it here.

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article

    * Required


    1. Timothy Porter

      You mean they’ll stop throwing each other off of roofs?

      Reply to Comment
    2. Itshak Gordin Halevy

      Does the Hamas recognize Israel as a Jewish State. Does it accept the the Jews can live in the Judea and Samaria? Or do these areas be Judenrein?

      Reply to Comment
      • Mark Shor

        Fatah-Hamas government requires land free of Jews.
        Therefore, Israeli demands are legitimate and forced:
        1. To divide National Insurance for Jews and Arabs, by forming the funds from taxes collected separately from Jews and Arabs.
        2. To employ only the Arabs, who will replace Israeli citizenship to the status of Israel’s residents.
        3. Deductions from wages ( income tax and health tax) of Arab residents to transfer to the Palestinian Authority , of course along with responsibility for health, education , jobs and pensions to all Arabs who wish to remain in Israel.

        Palestinian-Jordanian citizenship to the Arabs, Israeli citizenship to the Jews. Two Nations – Two States – Two Citizenships !
        The only sustainable long term solution is:
        The Arabs should be ruled by the Arab administration and the Jews should be governed by the Jewish government.

        Reply to Comment
        • JeffB


          OK assume that system were put in place.

          1) A week after that system is put in place there is a traffic accident between a Jewish car and a Palestinian car how is it adjudicated?

          2) A Palestinian business needs joint infrastructure. Which government’s regulatory body oversees this project. Is it both or the Israeli one?

          3) A Palestinian business wants to import goods from Italy. Who is the customs agent and what customs law is the agent under?

          4) How is status changed?

          Reply to Comment
    3. Lewis from Afula

      Yes, Israel must reconcile “moderate” Holocaust-Denial Dr who killed & castrated Israeli athletes at Munich TOGETHER with an “extreme” religious nutcase.

      Reply to Comment
    4. Of course Israel won’t support it. Why should anyone expect them to? It would mean that they could no longer say they don’t have a partner for peace.
      And BTW, people ask me: Where’s the Palestinian Mandela? How about Issa Amro? and he’s not the first. I ask them, Where’s the Israeli De Klerk? Just as important, if not more so.

      Reply to Comment
      • JeffB


        Where’s the Israeli De Klerk?

        Yitzhak Rabin, Ehud Barak, Yossi Beilin, Tzipi Livni, Ehud Olmert. They made multiple offers and were refused. Refusals often accompanied by violence. Their credibility and the credibility of their objectives were destroyed in the process. Today you have people like Stav Shaffir who could play that role if there was a desire to reach a deal. If Abbas wanted to prove a deal was reachable he could negotiate one with her, or heck just update the Geneva Initiative, and she could definitely get it to the floor.

        Reply to Comment