+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

Palestinian hunger striker to remain handcuffed to hospital bed

The Beersheba District Court also ruled that Bilal Kayed, who has been hunger striking for 58 days, will be prevented from seeing his doctor, citing ‘adequate’ treatment he receives at Ashkelon’s Barzilai hospital.

A Palestinian man wearing the likeness of hunger striking Palestinian journalist Muhammad al-Qiq lies shackled to a bed. Al-Qiq has been on hunger strike for 83 days in protest of his administrative detention. Bil’in, February 19, 2016. (Oren Ziv/Activestills.org)

A Palestinian man wearing the likeness of hunger striking Palestinian journalist Muhammad al-Qiq lies shackled to a bed. Al-Qiq has been on hunger strike for 83 days in protest of his administrative detention. Bil’in, February 19, 2016. (Oren Ziv/Activestills.org)

The Beersheba District Court decided in a precedent ruling that Bilal Kayed, a hunger-striking Palestinian administrative detainee, would be prevented from seeing his doctor.

The court also ruled that he would remain handcuffed to his bed, and accused Physicians for Human Rights (PHR), the organization that represented him, that they petitioned in bad faith.

 Kayed, 35, was jailed in 2002, during the second intifada, for attempted murder. Last June, when he was slated to start his parole, he was handed an administrative arrest warrant, on the grounds that as a member of the Popular Movement for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), he posed a security risk.

Kayed went on a hunger strike 58 days ago to protest his extrajudicial detention, which could be extended indefinitely. On July 17, he was hospitalized at Ashkelon’s Barzilai Medical Center after his health deteriorated.

In hospital, despite his poor health, he was handcuffed to his bed and guarded 24/7. In addition, he made a request to see his own doctor, but was refused by the Israel Prisons Service (IPS). Kayed’s unsuccessful petition was against these two provisions. His lawyers said he would appeal.

Hidden agenda

The court upheld IPS’ assessment that he might escape or be smuggled out, because the window in his ground-floor room has no bars.

In coming to assess the detainee’s risk, the court relied in this case – as in all administrative detentions – on classified reports, to which the detainee and his lawyers have no access. It was to protest this injustice that Kayed started hunger striking.

As for Kayed’s request to see his doctor, the judge ruled that it would be unnecessary because he receives “adequate” medical attention. He stated that Barzilai’s medical staff are “experienced” in treating Palestinian hunger strikers, and that he receives regular visits of the Red Cross. On this basis, the judge ruled that a second opinion is not indispensable.

“It is hard not to believe that the petition wasn’t motivated by a genuine concern for the petitioner’s health, but a hidden agenda that does not belong in court,” he wrote. “I have come to the conclusion that the request to see a private doctor was not made in good faith.”

“During the hearings, the IPS claimed that PHR are driven by a hidden agenda that has nothing to do with the petitioner’s health,” says Amani Dayif, the head of the organization’s prisoners department. “They didn’t say what that agenda might be, and we didn’t give these allegations a second thought because they clearly didn’t stand up, and in any event are irrelevant to his request. But to our surprise they were upheld by the judge.”

“PHR has campaigned for hunger strikers for years, and this is the first time a judge casts doubt on the legitimacy of our defense of prisoners,” she added. “This is a sign of how democracy in Israel is being eroded.”

“It should be noted that neither we nor Bilal ever claimed his medical treatment was not up to scratch,” she further said. “We only insisted on his lawful right to consult his own doctor. It’s also the first time it’s been claimed that the presence of a doctor on behalf of the Red Cross makes a prisoner’s request to see his own doctor redundant. The Red Cross is prevented from going public or seeking legal aid if a patient’s rights have been violated. The Red Cross themselves say they are no substitute for ongoing medical treatment.”

Subordinating medicine

“With every hunger striker we see to what extent the state apparatus encroaches on the basic rights of people who don’t even know why they are in custody,” said Ola Shtewi, a lawyer for PHR.

She added that Kayed’s health prevents him from carrying out basic functions, let alone escape his guards.

“IPS’ absurd claims reveal the simple truth: the purpose of Bilal’s handcuffing is to break his spirit, and sadly the court chose to play along by subordinating medical treatment to this charade,” she said.

Dozens of Palestinian detainees have been hunger striking in Israeli prisons, many of them in solidarity with Kayed. Israel detains hundreds more without trial, including a clown and a journalist.

This article was first published in Hebrew on Local Call. Read it here.

Newsletter banner

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article
  • LEAVE A COMMENT

    * Required

    COMMENTS

    1. Ben

      This case like so many others illustrates how the military, the military and civilian courts and their judges, the legal system, the civil administration, the government, the military censor, and the vast majority of the Israeli press together form a seamless interlocking system of totalitarian oppression. This is, vis a vis the Palestinians, a fundamentally totalitarian system dressed up as a “democracy.” With all the cruelties that naturally follow. We might as well be in Soviet East Germany as far as the Palestinians are concerned.

      Reply to Comment
      • R5

        Ben: Israel doesn’t pretend to run a democracy in the West Bank, just a military occupation, which even as occupations go, is far from totalitarian. Do you know what that word means? Because daily life in Palestinian cities goes on without Israelis even being present there. Are you quite young? Just checking because I would feel bad arguing with a kid.

        Reply to Comment