+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

Numbers for the president: Israeli attitudes toward Obama

An examination of Israeli public opinion toward U.S. President Obama and the two-state solution. The picture isn’t as bleak as the mainstream media might lead you to believe.

Prime Minister Netanyahu, President Obama and Israeli ambassador to Washington Michael Oren at Ben Gurion airport, March 20 2013 (photo: Government Press Office)

As President Obama continues his meetings in the region today, making the rounds to Ramallah and then back to Jerusalem, it is useful to keep in mind some trends regarding public opinion. Here are two specific themes that are relevant for this trip – attitudes towards the two-state solution to which he and his main interlocutors are so committed, and attitudes towards him.

Regarding the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, the Joint Israeli Palestinian Polls by the Truman Institute at Hebrew University show that Israeli and Palestinian public has very little hope for any sort of peace agreement: over 60 percent on both sides do not believe there is a chance of reaching such an agreement at this stage. The full data is available here from the Truman Institute at the Hebrew University.

The survey also tested the “whole package,” by asking respondents separately about specific clauses of an agreement, based mainly on the Clinton/Geneva parameters regarding final borders and territorial exchange, a demilitarized Palestinian state, refugees, security, Jerusalem, and the “end of conflict” clause. Here are the results:

•  Among Israelis, a 56 percent majority supports the plan and 40 percent are opposed – this is almost the same data as the previous year.

•  Among Palestinians, a majority of 53 percent opposes the plan and 46 percent supports it – a significant change from last year, when the population was split, but 50 percent supported it. Apparently somewhere between Operation Pillar of Defense and the UN bid, which hasn’t changed much so far, Palestinians lost some motivation for the two-state plan along the way.

However, another study shows the Israeli public is losing patience with some aspects of the permanent conflict for internal reasons. In an internet survey commissioned by a grassroots movement called “Electing a social budget” just prior to the January elections, respondents were asked about the extent of spending cuts they would recommend for a number of areas, in order to cut the country’s deficit. The survey was from 2-6 January, had 591 respondents, and 4.1 percent margin of error.

•  By a very wide margin, the highest support for the largest cuts (cuts were ranked on a scale of 0-5, with 5 as the greatest spending cut) was for the settlement budget: fully 63.4 percent of the sample selected very large cuts to the settlement budget.

•  That number is 50 points higher than the second-ranked answer for the highest spending cuts. But interestingly, second place went to the security budget (14.8 percent chose to cut spending), which is actually tied (within the margin of error) for the third-ranked “large cuts” item: infrastructure such as train tracks (14.6 percent).

When considering the average from the 0-5 ranking of the extent of cuts to the budgets – the settlement budget obviously had the highest score, with 4.2 (remember, “5” denoted the largest cuts). But this was also true among those who identified themselves as right wing: the average score was 3.8, but this was higher than the average for any other item among the Right.

‘Why Did Obama Throw Israel Under the Bus?’ The Israeli answer – he didn’t.

The myth that Israelis dislike Obama tends to be based on media surveys that are either shoddily conducted or interpreted, like the following Maariv poll by Ma’agar Mohot (Hebrew ) from the day before the president’s visit. The article never mentions sample size or margin of error – those minor details. It refers to a poll of the “Israeli public,” without specifying whether this is a “representative sample” (i.e., includes Arabs) or Jews only, which is also common.

•  The article reports that 38 percent think Obama is hostile to Israel, while one-third (presumably around 33 percent, but the article does not specify) think he is friendly and 14 percent say he is indifferent. If it’s not clear: A minority thinks he’s hostile.

•  The article specifies that only 10 percent love Obama, while three times as many (32 percent) don’t love him but respect him. Well. Do Israelis really have to love him?

However, it is true that Israelis have held suspicious, mixed and changing views during Obama’s first term, and questions about whether he was more loyal to Palestinians or Israelis sometimes favored the former. Nathan Jeffay gave a good review of the data and speculations about their meaning – back in 2009. But by April 2012, Israelis were evenly divided about which side he was one (one-quarter each thought he was more pro-Israeli or pro-Palestinian), and the plurality thought he was neutral (36 percent).

But the latest Peace Index survey from Tel Aviv University and the Israel Democracy Institute (n=600, 11-14 March, representative sample) asks questions with more substance and depth, and the picture is quite different. When the survey asked if people thought President Obama’s attitude toward Israel was friendly or not:

•  42.5 percent believe he is friendly (very-somewhat).

•  Only 37 percent of the Jewish respondents say he is friendly to Israel, but that’s more than three times as many as those who think he is hostile (10.5 percent).

•  The large plurality, 44.5 percent of the total public, thinks he is “professional/neutral.”

The survey then asked the controversial question about whether Obama sides more with Israelis or with Palestinians.

•  One-quarter (25 percent) actually believe he is more pro-Israel, compared to 18 percent who think he is pro-Palestinian.

•  It is true that among Jewish Israelis, just 18 percent think he is pro-Israeli and 23 percent view him as pro-Palestinian.

•  Yet in both cases (Jews and total population), the majority believe that Obama is neutral (over 50 percent), which is not exactly a bad thing for someone who is supposed to be an honest broker.

•  If only Palestinians felt that way; they don’t. Although the sample is too small to be certain, the trend is also very strong: Seventy percent of Arabs in Israel in this same survey think that he is more pro-Israeli, 6.6 percent view him as pro-Palestinian and under one-fifth view him as neutral.

Here’s the final question from the Peace Index that is indicative: “To what extent do you currently trust or not trust U.S. President Barack Obama to consider Israel’s interests and safeguard them?” The response from the general public is solid, and a far cry from the throwing-under-the-bus myth:

•  A 52 percent majority say he can be trusted (greatly or somewhat); 46 percent do not trust him (somewhat or “not at all” – but the latter is just 12 percent).

•  Among Jews, 45 percent trust  him to consider and safeguard such interests, compared to 53.5 percent who do not. Again, among Jews who do not trust him, 40 percent give a moderate answer (“not so much”) and just a minority – 13.5 percent – say “not at all.”

Still, one is led to wonder what maintains the suspicion lingering among many Israeli Jews. His government isolated itself to vote against a Palestinian state in the U.N. He helped Israel deal with the crisis at the embassy in Cairo; insisted on maintaining massive foreign aid to Israel at the toughest of times. It is painful to think that the vague suspicion is linked vaguely to his middle name; but surely the strong show of friendship on the first day of Obama’s visit is likely to yield some changes in the next numbers we’ll see.

Correction appended: 40 percent of Israelis are opposed to the “whole package” plan, not 50%.

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article

    * Required


    1. XYZ

      I have heard some of what Obama has said here in Israel and it has surprised me by its tone of friendliness and support. Whether or not he really means it is irrelevant, because it is infuriating the Palestinians and their supporters. Juan Cole got upset because Obama mentioned the ancient Jewish roots in Israel which Cole denies, for example.
      The problem is that Israelis have not forgotten what happened in the past. Obama was apparently given very bad advice at the beginning of his Presidency which said that he could separate American Jews from supporting a right-wing Israeli gov’t because they supposedly don’t like the settlements, settlers and the Orthodox Jews who are identified with the settlements and the Likud gov’t. Thus, he gave the Palestinians a free “settlement freeze” while seeing them pocket it and give nothing in return and have the refuse to negotiation with Israel. Then there was the Cairo speech which ignored the Jewish connection with the Land. Then there is Obama open support for the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, Syria, and related parties in Turkey, while he turns his back on secular moderates in those countries. These things have not been forgotten by Israelis, and the consequences of his support for radical political Islam in the Middle East (which he seems to believe is on the ‘right side of history’ whatever that means) will have far-reaching consequences, of which the terrorist attack in Benghazi and the murder of the US ambassador there which Obama’s regime tried to cover up, is just the first installment.

      Reply to Comment
      • aristeides

        More lies from XYZ. Cole doesn’t “deny the ancient Jewish roots” in Israel, he puts them in historical context. Being, you know, a historian.

        Reply to Comment
    2. American

      Having become only fairly recently interested in these topics, I wonder if you Israelis believe what you see on American television? Do you think that Obama is the “victim of white racism”, so therefore he possesses some imagined superior virtue? Do you think that he ever has any thought whatsoever about doing the “right thing” or keeping his word?

      All politicians lie, but some people do it just because that’s their inescapable nature. Obama stabbed his own grandmother in the back (though she raised him) by calling her a “racist” in order to further his personal ambitions during his first election campaign. What do you think he’s eventually going to do to you?

      Reply to Comment
      • American

        Here’s an example of a story which you would never see on an American network, from today:
        “Barbs of racism, anti-Semitism in NY school clash”
        (Ultra-Orthodox Jews on a school board are accused of racism by blacks and Hispanics.)

        Neither Obama nor his black racist Attorney General Eric Holder will go near this story, because it would break the mold that only whites are racist.

        Well, your own Jewish media might cover that one, but never this one:
        “Florida Atlantic Univ. student claims he was suspended for not stomping on Jesus”

        Note the misleading use of the word “claims” in the title. In reality, the suspension is admitted as so: “[a university] official defended the decision, telling WPEC that the Jesus-stomping was part of a classroom exercise from a textbook: “Intercultural Communication: A Contextual Approach, 5th Edition.”

        Anyone stomping on a Muslim or Jewish symbol would likely be arrested for a ‘hate crime’. The ACLU, run mostly by Jewish secular liberals, would demand arrests. But colleges are requiring stomping on the name of Jesus.

        We here know that the establishment power of America is run by reverse prejudice. Yet people who live elsewhere believe the lie that all minorities are always and only the victims of the white hetero Christian male.

        Why do I post this here? Because you have the very unusual situation of Jews having been previously beyond criticism in the U.S. Critics would be branded as “anti-Semitic bigots” and destroyed. Yet now, the Palestinians are eclipsing Jews in victimhood status. Things are going topsy turvy. Apart from any judgement on who is right and who is wrong, the mechanics of political-correctness being unraveled is so interesting to watch.

        Who wants to bet against the prospect of Obama (or his wife) being seen in a Palestinian scarf in the next few years. I’m fairly sure that Hillary once wore one before she decided to run for office in New York state, of course.

        Reply to Comment
        • The Trespasser

          Affirmative Action is the cause, IMHO.

          A group can’t be given any priority based on it’s skin colour.

          Reply to Comment
          • American

            Still, that’s precisely how Obama got elected. In fact, that’s how he got any position he’s ever held in life. America’s past over the last decade or two is your future. The roadmap is there.

            Reply to Comment
          • The Trespasser

            I see what you are saying.

            In Israel in 1990’s there was a kind of affirmative action program, died out in 2000’s though.

            Israeli Arabs are faring pretty well and are having miscellaneous positions without any similar laws.

            Palestinians Arabs are not citizens of the state, and will got going to be in foreseeable future, as 1SS is way off the table, so there can’t be any mechanism to enforce their employment.

            Nowadays it is fashionable among leftist crowd to compare Israel to Jim Crow or whatever, however there is significant difference – USA blacks never tried to exterminate entire white population.

            Reply to Comment
      • The Trespasser

        We don’t see American television in Israel.

        What he’s going to do to us? Dunno really. This comment has been edited for inappropriate content.

        p.s. Obama should have not accepted the Nobel peace prize, that’s for sure.

        Reply to Comment
    3. directrob

      “Among Israelis, a 56 percent majority supports the plan and 50 percent are opposed”

      I assume 40% opposed …

      Reply to Comment
    4. sherban

      Mr.Obama have to speak such kind of speeches in US where 67% of American public is for Israel while only 17%for it hold Palestinian side.When the truth about the right of Palestinians to live in freedom will be completed with the fact that is also just because they had lived here from many,many years enough to be seen as native population then ,maybe,American population will see more balanced what side need support.Then, naturally, Israeli policy will become more realistic and the Israeli right wing will lose its power funded in the lie of the justice for Greater Israel aspiration.Even the left in Israel doesn’t speak about Palestinians right to live in Palestine,but only about the demographic danger of a two nations state.

      Reply to Comment