Appreciate this article? +972 depends on your support.

Click here to help us keep going

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

Nobody should be shocked at the Hebron execution

When Israeli leaders keep pushing the message that killing Palestinian attackers is a laudable act, is it any wonder that the shooters become our national heroes?

WARNING: This post contains a highly graphic video and images.

The actions of an Israeli soldier who executed a wounded Palestinian attacker in Hebron on Thursday have been condemned by politicians from right to left, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon — albeit indirectly — as well as by the Israeli media. Everyone is at pains to stress how far the soldier strayed from the IDF’s values when he shot Abed al Fatah a-Sharif in the head as he lay injured in the street, having already been shot after reportedly attacking a different soldier.

The military itself sprang into action, arresting the soldier in question and opening an investigation against him on suspicion of murder.

But the shock itself is jarring. Since the current wave of increased violence began — set off, arguably, by an Israeli soldier killing Hadeel al-Hashlamon in almost exactly the same spot, almost exactly six months ago — Israel’s ruling coalition has done next to nothing to try and calm down a public that is apparently in favor of extrajudicial killings and has at the same time developed a serious snuff film habit.

The biggest uproar over the issue of Israelis shooting dead Palestinian assailants in recent months was actually caused by IDF Chief of Staff Gadi Eizenkot, who said that he didn’t want to see “a soldier empty a magazine on a girl with scissors.” Eizenkot was swiftly criticized by numerous members of the ruling coalition.

By comparison, when (“centrist”) politicians in government or spiritual leaders have expressed the need to shoot to kill every Palestinian assailant there has been precious little notice taken, while vigilantism is at best half-heartedly advised against and at worst actively encouraged.

The Israeli press bears huge responsibility for this state of affairs as well, using chauvinistic, dehumanizing and vulgar terminology when describing Israeli responses to Palestinian assailants, would-be or actual (and occasionally when no attack has been planned at all).

Israeli shows a tear gas gun he just bought at a gun shop in Jerusalem on October 15, 2015. Arms shop's owners report a rise in demand for wepons and other self deface gear as violance continues around Jerusalem. (photo: Yotam Ronen)

Israeli shows a gun he just bought at a gun shop in Jerusalem on October 15, 2015. Arms shop owners report a rise in demand for weapons and other self-defense gear as violence continues around Jerusalem. (photo: Yotam Ronen)

Words like “eliminated” and “neutralized” are de rigueur when referring to a Palestinian assailant who has been shot by Israeli security forces, and the shot individuals themselves are only ever labeled terrorists, whether they actually managed to carry out an attack or not. In certain cases, you may even see a photograph of a dead Palestinian with the word “eliminated” stamped over it in red.

The soldiers and police officers who pulled the trigger, meanwhile, are lionized in news stories, with detailed descriptions of exactly how and when they opened fire accompanied by glowing commendations from their superiors and peers. They may even be bestowed with an honorific, as was the “Terminator,” a member of an elite IDF unit who shot dead three alleged Palestinian assailants in the space of nine days. His photo and “accomplishments” went viral after being published by the Israeli army.

In October last year, during the opening few weeks of this latest wave of violence, Israel Hayom — a foreign-funded freesheet and the most widely-read paper in the country — published two sets of photographs on its front page. On top was a row of pictures of Palestinians running with knives; underneath, pictures of Israelis running with firearms and aiming their guns at the assailants. The accompanying headline was “Their hatred, and our heroism.”

The message that comes through time and again is that shooting dead Palestinian attackers is a laudable act, and one that may well turn whoever fired the gun into the latest national hero.

A Magen David Adom ambulance attempts to navigate around the body of a Palestinian man who shot in the head by an Israeli soldier in the occupied city of Hebron. The man, who reportedly took part in stabbing another soldier, had already been shot and incapacitated. March 24, 2016. (Screenshot/B’Tselem)

A Magen David Adom ambulance attempts to navigate around the body of a Palestinian man who shot in the head by an Israeli soldier in the occupied city of Hebron. The man, who reportedly took part in stabbing another soldier, had already been shot and incapacitated. March 24, 2016. (Screenshot/B’Tselem)

So why is everyone so shocked? Where were the government voices in the last six months to suggest that, perhaps, killing Palestinians who either carried out or threatened to carry out an attack is not an act of national heroism? Where has been the discussion — save for in a few sparse and reviled corners — of the consistent use of lethal force by the army and police and the almost blanket immunity they enjoy? How often have members of the ruling coalition deviated from the standard line that these kids with guns are heroes, and even more so when they pull the trigger?

The soldier who executed Abed al Fatah a-Sharif on Thursday is rightly being brought before the law. But the far broader and more pressing issue is that he was simply following the example that dozens before him have set, and have been praised for.

As usual when these incidents are caught on camera, however, the “gone rogue” narrative looks likely to prevail, and that is a gift to Israel’s political echelon. That way there’s no systemic issue to grapple with, and everyone can pretend that a portrait of an execution is just an unpleasant reel of film, and not a mirror.

Newsletter banner

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article
  • LEAVE A COMMENT

    * Required

    COMMENTS

    1. Carmen

      Who is shocked? Certainly none of the bystanders in this execution caught on video or any others for that matter. If you go to the comments section in the JPost under the story about this murdering medic being arrested, most of the comments are that this murdering medic is some kind of hero and that the young man he murdered was a terrorist. The IOF are the terrorists, the zionist state is a rogue state founded on terrorism and continuing to this day. The only thing I am shocked by is the fact that the zionist state has yet to be sanctioned, and the ICC has yet to demand netanyahu and his cabinet be tried for crimes against humanity.

      Reply to Comment
    2. Farragut

      Nobody should be shocked that the Left is defending the Arab enemy.

      Reply to Comment
      • Farragut is spot on. All this breast-beating and self-flagellation that blindly ignores the root of the problem which is endemic Arab anti-semitism.

        Reply to Comment
    3. Amanda K

      Which Arab country would ever put a soldier on trial for killing a terrorist? Israel did. The only democracy in the Middle East. You choose to highlight certain facts whilst burying others – totally biased journalism. It is a real shame….

      Reply to Comment