+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

Netanyahu uses illegal settlement affair to teach leftists a lesson

Prime Minister Netanyahu is directing the ‘price tag’ method at NGOs and the judicial system, stating that his government will act against those trying to enforce what little rights the Palestinians have.

In the last couple of years, we’ve witnessed a series of pogroms by settlers or their supporters, directed either at the IDF or, more often, Palestinians. These attacks, which received the common moniker of “price tags”, were orchestrated by several settler leaders, and the concept behind them was that each time the government tried to dislodge a settlement or an outpost, someone else would suffer. Generally, the settler turned the Palestinians into their hostages in order to deter the government and the military from enforcing eviction notices against them.

Just yesterday, a “price tag” attack was committed in Neve Shalom, a mixed Arab-Jewish village, by vandals who identified as opposers of the decision to move Ulpana. Cars were vandalized with messages like “Death to Arabs” and “Regards from Ulpana.”

This week, we have seen Prime Minister Netanyahu embracing the same vengeful method. In his Knesset speech following the Ulpana debacle (the Netanyahu government pledged to build 851 new apartments in the West Bank, as well as uproot and transport the five Ulpana houses, at a staggering cost), Netanyahu said:

I tell those who think they can use the judicial system to hurt settlement, that they are mistaken, because in practice, the exact opposite will occur. Instead of shrinking Beit El – Beit El has expanded.  Instead of hurting settlement, settlement has been strengthened.

A quick overview of the facts is essential. The Ulpana Hill buildings were built on stolen Palestinian land, taken on the basis of fabricated documents. This is uncontested either by the courts or the state. Most of the settlers living there were evidently aware of the land’s shady status, as they did not purchase apartments there, but rather rented. The judicial process demanding the removal of the trespassers has been going on for years. Finally, the High Court of Justice left the government with no alternative but to evacuate the squatters – and now the government will indemnify them for their failed land heist, at the public’s expense.

But Netanyahu goes further. His threat is directed both at the Palestinians and Israeli NGOs: if you try to save individual Palestinians by, lo and behold, asserting their legal rights, then we shall punish the Palestinian collective. We shall deepen our invasion of their lands. The price tag: around 30 new apartments for every one you bring down. There is nothing you can do to stop the settlement process, and if you win a rare and hideously slow legal process, you shall rue the day.

Some people still think Netanyahu in the cocoon, from which a De Gaulle butterfly will emerge. We were told time and time again that Netanyahu is more pragmatic, that his father is holding him back. Well, the father is dead, and now we see the true face of Netanyahu, and – surprise! It’s the one he’s been wearing all along: the settlements and the well-being of the settlers above any other issue.

This comment also shows Netanyahu’s disturbing attitude towards law and law enforcement. Israel claims to be a democracy; perhaps it was, for the short period between the end of the military rule over Israeli Palestinians and the 1967 war. But a democracy is tested by the way its government treats the laws and its court. A prime minister who says that if the courts decide against him, he will make his political opponents sorry, is hardly one living in a democracy.

And the fact that hardly anyone protested this deeply anti-democratic comment says all that needs to be said about Israel’s so-called democracy.

Related:
NYTimes got it wrong: PM opposed bill in order to expand settlements
Knesset vote reveals how weak the settlers truly are 

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article
  • LEAVE A COMMENT

    * Required

    COMMENTS

    1. Rehmat

      Sorry Yossi – you don’t understand the mind track of Bibi, the former American furniture salesperson. Bibi uses new illegal Jewish settlements to rub Washington’s nose – and reminds Americans who really is their Boss.

      In 2010 – Hollywood filmmaker, Oliver Stone, in an interview with British daily Sunday Times – in response to why there was “such a focus on the Holocaust”, had replied: “The Jewish domination of the media. They stay on top of every comment, the most powerful lobby in Washington. Israel has f***** up United States foreign policy for years.”

      http://rehmat1.com/2011/02/20/washington-cannot-say-no-to-jewish-lobby/

      Reply to Comment
    2. I have come to the conclusion that the vanguard of settlers, those actively expanding land control, burning fields, destroying trees, capturing water sources, sometimes firing guns, whose ideology is clearly deep Torah (they don’t go home and read Spinoza), enjoy the implicit approval of the State. Bibi’s comment, above, makes that approval explicit. The intent is to expunge, to erase, from livelihood and memory those prior resident, and religious ideology will be used to that end. Bibi’s stance is denial of ideology while enjoying its fruits; but the ideology attaches to the State.
      .
      This ideology feeds back into Israel proper, for the polity, and government, condemns resident Bank livelihood and resistence for merely being; soldiers can do little if no wrong in support of the People. I believe this ideological backflow is evidenced by the incitment to riot in South Tel Aviv–not just that there was a riot, but that MK’s actively flamed the hatred in South Tel Aviv that very night, bringing in party memebers for the event. I believe that talk by MK’s (one formally of high rank in the IDF) that “leftists” (which seems to mean anyone who has eyes to see harm and pain) should be placed in camps along with African refugees is further evidence of this backflow.
      .
      Bibi’s stance in moving the houses (only pure ideological commitment would motivate such an absurdity), promising 30 times as more new housing in the Bank, is as well a claim that ideology will trump any Court decision. “Those that think they can use the judicial system” (above) implies that the judicial system in itself cannot alter the political landscape; Justices will too be contained if they go too far–they can always be walked around. Bibi did more than threaten “leftists”: he asserted that the judiciary, if it chose on principle to act given a case, will fail.
      .
      Jacob became Israel after wrestling YHWH to a standstill (Genesis 32:23-30). Israel will have to wrestle YHWH again; neither will be the same thereafter–such is the story, and YHWH’s documented limitation.
      .
      Never again. Always remember. These are words the State knows–and is determined to nullify them elsewhere.
      .
      972 makes me despair sometimes. I have thought about “leaving.” I am of no importance, but I believe reason must not be lost. I believe Spinoza was more right than wrong–and at least I can say I would fight for that.

      Reply to Comment