+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

Building a new Mizrahi political home in Israeli politics

Mizrahim, like much of the Jewish-Israeli public, are sinking into a kind of fortress nationalism. The key to change can be found in an alliance with the Palestinians.

Likud party supporters at a rally in support of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, as he and his wife face legal investigations, Tel Aviv, August 9, 2017. (Tomer Neuberg/Flash90)

Likud party supporters at a rally in support of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, as he and his wife face legal investigations, Tel Aviv, August 9, 2017. (Tomer Neuberg/Flash90)

After effectively destroying the Israeli Labor Party by leading it to an unprecedented low in the last elections, chairman Avi Gabbay announced on Thursday that he is quitting politics. Kulanu leader, centrist politician Moshe Kahlon, came crawling on all fours to Prime Minister Netanyahu after he too crashed in the elections. Orly Levy, who broke away from Avigdor Liberman’s right-wing Yisrael Beiteinu to form the centrist Gesher party, didn’t even make it past the election threshold.

The sun seems to have set on three of Israel’s most promising Mizrahi politicians. But do the election results signal the end of Mizrahi politics? Do Mizrahi politics even exist in the first place?

The Mizrahi issue in Israel finds itself in a difficult catch-22: it is a popular topic of heated public debate yet hardly makes a dent come election time. Mizrahi candidates usually view their ethnic background as an electoral asset as long as it helps them to be seen as “of the people” — one of the most exhausting tropes applied to Mizrahim.

Not only the poor

To be fair, Orly Levy’s story is slightly different. She managed to cobble together an excellent women-led, feminist list that included several veteran Mizrahi activists. But Levy is viewed as a Mizrahi politician mainly because she dedicates herself to social issues, which leads to yet another catch-22: the Mizrahi issue is widely seen as synonymous with issues of social class.

Orly Levy at a meeting with Gesher supporters, Netanya. February 26, 2019. (Gili Yaari/Flash90)

Orly Levy at a meeting with Gesher supporters, Netanya. February 26, 2019. (Gili Yaari/Flash90)

This identification, however, is a dangerous and manipulative reduction of Mizrahi discourse. Mizrahi identity is not just about poverty, the periphery and economic oppression — it is first and foremost a political option. Representation is only part of this option, just as adequate gender representation is only one of the components that comprise a feminist worldview. Yet not every woman in a position of power is necessarily a feminist, and the same goes for Mizrahim.

The question of what comprises Mizrahi politics is a complex one, if only because in many ways the category of Mizrahiness itself is an artificial construct forced upon a group of diverse communities by the Ashkenazi establishment in the years after Israel’s founding. One would be remiss, however, to define this category solely through the Ashkenazi gaze. If Mizrahiness wants to become a political alternative, it needs to make room for the positive components of its identity including historical memory, culture, language, and perhaps most importantly, its indigenous Middle Eastern identity, alongside an attempt to create the right conditions to allow each of these elements to be realized and flourish.

Building a political home

The Mizrahi connection to the Middle East should be viewed as an attempt to break down the walls that define the “us” versus “them” dichotomy, which actively nourishes feelings of alienation and hostility between Mizrahim and Palestinians. Without this element, the Mizrahi project turns into a hollow attempt at coexistence over a plate of hummus with some nameless Arab. This is precisely the difference between revolutionary politics and opportunist politics. The Zionist establishment does not care whether Mizrahim and Arabs eat hummus together, as long as the Mizrahi knows which side she stands on when the chips are down.



The sad fact is that, in the broadest sense, there is no political home for Mizrahim to speak assertively about their identity or to understand that identity in a geopolitical context. Mizrahim, as part of the larger Jewish-Israeli public, are sinking into a kind of fortress nationalism that at best can aspire for limited cosmetic changes within the confines of the imagined Zionist villa in the heart of an Arab region. No Mizrahi politician speaks about dismantling the villa walls, and without doing so, the Mizrahi struggle will forever remain relegated to negotiations between the Ashkenazi prison guard and the Mizrahi prisoner.

The Joint List could be that very political home. Unfortunately, the Mizrahi issue is nowhere to be found on the Arab public’s agenda. It is, of course, hard to blame Israel’s Palestinian citizens when taking stock of a reality in which the Arab parties are struggling for survival and the ability to present a united Palestinian front. Moreover, it is hard to demand that a public fighting institutionalized oppression be sensitive to the internal politics of the oppressor.

In a deeper sense, however, the Joint List may be the only significant political platform for Mizrahi politics, the first goal of which must be liberation from the Zionist establishment’s chains that have stripped us of our identity and our connection to this region of the world. It is not unreasonable to assume that after Mizrahim take this important first step, the question of representation will solve itself.

This article was first published in Hebrew on Local Call. Read it here.

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article

    * Required


    1. Lewis from Afula

      More illogical absurdity from Ms Noy, here.
      Regarding de-Israelizing the Mizrachim, does the author not know that at least 35% of young Israelis are of mixed Mizachi-Ashkenasi ancestries ?
      This percentage keeps increasing with each year.
      Moreover, even those of unmixed descent, any diasporan memories and identies have been erased over 70 years of Israeli statehood.

      Ms Noy believes a few well-written articles published in her Leftist Hebrew magazine will surely affect the dismantling of the Israeli Nation. One big, final “intellectual push” and the imagined Israeli villa will definitely implode. Thus, its former inhabitants will be free to scatter into the jungle where they will peacfully “merge” with the awaiting Arab utopias.

      Reply to Comment
      • Rivka Koen

        Did you know 90% of white U.S. Americans are 1/8 Cherokee?

        Reply to Comment
        • Lewis from Afula

          …………………….And that has nothing at all to do with this conversation.

          Reply to Comment
      • Ben

        “the dismantling of the Israeli Nation”

        What are you talking about? You sound like a leftist. The right wing insists there is no such thing as the Israeli Nation, only “the Jewish Nation.” Israel refuses to recognize an Israeli nationality (and that absurd fact says it all). Because those in power want Israel to be a racist ethnic state. “Israeli Nation” would be far too inclusive for the current right wing and center wing and anything-but-left-wing. What is actually needed is an Israeli Nation that unites people of all ethnicities. When one can list “Israeli” as one’s nationality on one’s passport, do call us back.

        Reply to Comment
    2. Joel

      Israeli society has changed. The tensions between Mizrachi and Ashkenazi are largely a thing of the past. I have a work associate, a young man of Libyan Jewish heritage, who didn’t believe the stories of discrimination that his parents and grandparents told him. He thought they were making them up. His experience was very different.

      The Mizrachi-Ashkenazi story is a useful political tool for some, but it has little to do with modern Israel. I am sure Orly is aware of this at some level, but sometimes people need reality to match their vision, rather than have their vision see reality.

      Reply to Comment
      • Firentis

        Shhh. They think it is still 1959 and 50% of Israelis who don’t know a word of Arabic other than ‘waqef walla ana batuchak’ will any minute discover that they are Arabs.

        Also Orly Noy, the Iranian Jewish member of the Palestinian Arab nationalist Balad party is just really really confused.

        Reply to Comment
      • Ben

        They are not a thing of the past. The Likud and Mr. Netanyahu exploit the socioeconomic divisions, wounds and festering resentments constantly. It’s their bread and butter. Who are you kidding and what kind of rah rah blue and white Birthright Disney fairy tale are you trying to sell us?

        Reply to Comment
    3. Eliza

      Perhaps it would be better to go the whole hog on this.

      Firstly, Zionism presents Israel as the villa in the Arab jungle; not region – a nice unemotive word. No, its the Arab jungle presumably peopled by Arab savages. Zionism has used the David and Goliath motif whereby brave little Israel triumphs against the powerful forces of Arabia. So just how can Israel afford to allow Arab Jews any Arabic identity. And if Arabic Jews are acceptable, then why not Arab people who are Muslim or Christian. This cannot be within the Zionist framework. Zionism and Israel is premised on being a Jewish State and it follows that ancestry and ethnic origin must take second place to ‘Jewishness’. Ethnic origin, especially if it is Arabic must be slowly forgotten and replaced with ‘Jewishness’.

      It is not just hard, but impossible to ask the Arabs of the wrong religion within your midst to take up the cause of shoring up the Arabic connection of the Mizrachim when that subset of Israel is as ready as the best of them to oppress non-Jewish Arabs, whether they be within Israel Proper or under occupation in the territories.

      Just how self-entitled do you think you are? It really cannot be the responsibility of the oppressed to care too much about the plight of the people who may occupy the lesser place within the framework of those who combine to oppress them.

      Reply to Comment