+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

'Klinghoffer': New York’s Jewish right goes to the opera

Now that ‘The Death of Klinghoffer’ has opened and people are learning what the opera is actually about, the outraged claims made against it are being exposed as hot air.    

Until Monday night, when the “The Death of Klinghoffer” opened at New York’s Metropolitan Opera, people knew it was being attacked by many Jews for supposedly being anti-Semitic and for defending terrorists, and they didn’t know if the accusations were true or false. But now that the opera has opened, and it’s been widely reviewed, and audience members have been interviewed, it’s becoming clear to the mainstream public that pays attention to such issues – and this controversy has attracted a lot of attention – that these claims are total bullshit.

And what should be clear, though it probably isn’t, is that the protest against the opera, the raging campaign to prevent it from being staged at the Met, was not made by “American Jews” or even “New York Jews,” but by the anti-Muslim, anti-liberal, pro-war American Jewish right based in New York – the same people whose word should never be taken for anything.

As the right-wing Orthodox Jewish Press noted helpfully in an article titled “For Grass Roots Klinghoffer Protest, Jewish Establishment MIA”:

Not one mainstream Jewish organization has lent its name or its resources to this effort. …

The mostly small, and some quite tiny pro-Israel organizations which have been working tirelessly to fight the Met’s decision to stage “Klinghoffer” are (this is all of them): Advocates for Israel, AMCHA, Americans for a Safe Israel, the Bridge Project, Citizens Opposed to Propaganda Masquerading as Art, Catholic League, Christians’ Israel Public Action Campaign, Congregation Oheb Zedek, Congregaton Or Zarua, Endowment for Middle East Truth, Hasbara Fellowship, Human Rights Coalition Against Radical Islam, International Committee for the Land of Israel, Israel Forever Foundation, Israel’s Voice, JCCWatch.org, Jewish Action Alliance, Jewish Political Education Foundation, MERCL, Mothers Against Terrorism, One Israel Fund, Rambam Mesivta High School, Shalhevet High School for Girls, Simon Wiesenthal Center, StandWithUs, Strength to Strength, Westchester Hebrew High School, Zionist Organization of America.

This is not to say, though, that it was entirely a fringe effort; a former New York governor and a few local politicians lent their names to the protest. Ronald Lauder, one of the biggest right-wing machers in the world, was on the podium at the rally across from Lincoln Center. Rudolph Giuliani, possibly this crowd’s single favorite gentile, was the guest of honor, and while he argued against forcing “Klinghoffer” to shut down and didn’t accuse it of anti-Semitism, he complained that it was guilty of “historical inaccuracy and historical damage.” In an article in the Daily Beast, he lamented that the opera, first staged in 1991, was partly responsible for the Oslo Accords.

But the giveaway that the attacks on “The Death of Klinghoffer” were the product of the most closed-minded, ultra-nationalistic, bigoted reaches of organized New York Jewry was that the emcee at Monday night’s protest rally was Jeffrey Weisenfeld. Weisenfeld came to fame a few years ago when he blocked a New York college from giving playwright Tony Kushner an honorary doctorate because Kushner wrote (correctly) that Israel carried out ethnic cleansing in the War of Independence. At the time Weisenfeld said, “My mother would call Tony Kushner a kapo.” He also said Palestinians were “not human” because they “worship death for their children.” A couple of years ago he told me in an interview that it wasn’t enough for Israel to destroy Iran’s nuclear weapons, it had to destroy all its enemies’ conventional missiles, too. ”Israel can’t go on living with 200,000 missiles pointing at it,” he said.

Another star of the protest was, inevitably, “America’s rabbi,” Shmuley Boteach, scourge of Israel’s critics and sycophant to the rich and famous.

In retrospect, it should have been obvious from the names associated with the protest that the claims against the opera were nonsense. Furthermore, even Anti-Defamation League head Abraham Foxman said the opera “is not anti-Semitic” (though he did harrumph that it is “highly problematic and has a strong anti-Israel bias …”) One just has to ask himself: Would New York’s Metropolitan Opera put on an anti-Semitic production? Would it glorify terrorism? And if anybody were going to glorify terrorism, would they do it by showing terrorists on a hijacked cruise ship shooting an old man in a wheelchair and throwing him overboard?

But again, nobody had seen the opera. People were not aware that this wasn’t American Jewry making accusations, this was hysterical right-wing American Jewry making accusations. And finally, the protest was given legitimacy by the moral leadership provided by Leon Klinghoffer’s daughters, Lisa and Ilsa. In a letter included in the playbill given to members of the audience, they wrote that the opera “presents false moral equivalencies without context, and offers no real insight into the historical reality and the senseless murder of an American Jew. It rationalizes, romanticizes and legitimizes the terrorist murder of our father.”

Lisa and Ilsa Klinghoffer’s motives are pure; they’re acting out of personal anguish and whatever they say or do with regard to the opera is understandable and irreproachable. Not so at all for the protest’s rank and file, though, and unfortunately the Klinghoffer daughters’ immunity from criticism was transferred, to a large degree, to the protest itself. Whether or not the Klinghoffer daughters or the protesters intended it, the effect on the public watching the controversy play out was a kind of emotional blackmail: If the victim’s daughters say the opera glorifies terrorism, who am I to say it doesn’t, especially when I haven’t seen it?

But again, this changed after Monday night when the reviews came in, and when audience members who’d actually seen the play (unlike the protesters) began talking about it. Here’s Jordan Hoffman’s review in the Times of Israel, a centrist website:

The [protesters’] problem with the work … seemed to stem from the fact that the opera does not portray the hijackers as mindless bloodthirsty monsters, but dares to give the men and their cause a degree of backstory.

That it also shows these men shooting an innocent elderly man in cold blood and concludes with a heartbreaking aria from his widow didn’t seem to carry much weight with this bunch, nor did any discussion of whether representation in a work of fiction automatically means endorsement.

Here’s Adam Langer in The Forward, a liberal Zionist publication, after seeing a dress rehearsal:

Does the opera, as some protesters have contended, idealize terrorism or condone murder? Of course not. If anything, it seems to be an impassioned and perhaps naive plea for dialogue and mutual understanding.

That’s from the Times of Israel and the Forward, there’s no need to quote New York Times reviewer Anthony Tommasini’s dismissal of the protesters’ claims. But what the hell:

In the libretto, the murder takes place offstage. Here, it is depicted explicitly, which should silence detractors who charge that “Klinghoffer” explains away a vicious murder.

For the reactions of audience members, see here and here. The opening-night performance got “tremendous” ovations at the end, according to the Times. A lot of the people cheering – maybe even most of them – were New York Jews, which is important to remember.

Myself, I didn’t see the opera but I did read the libretto (the words), and I have to say that from that alone, I didn’t understand the opera’s message; the lines are written in lyric poetry, and most of it I couldn’t make heads or tails of. But there were some parts literal enough for me to understand, such as the “heartbreaking aria from [Klinghoffer’s] widow” that ends the opera, and the crudely anti-Semitic remarks spoken by a killer named “Rambo.” Plus, of course, I knew that the opera shows Palestinian terrorists murdering an old Jewish man in a wheelchair. So while I still don’t know what the opera’s message is, I damn sure know what it isn’t.

Related:
Anti-Semitism has no place in Palestine advocacy
A distorted portrait of Palestinian ‘anti-Semitism’

Newsletter banner 6 -540

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article
  • LEAVE A COMMENT

    * Required

    COMMENTS

    1. Richard

      How would +972 leftists react to an opera about the burning alive of a Palestinian teen? What if that Opera opened with an “even-handed” summary of Israeli and Palestinian grievances at the beginning? The guy who shot Klinghoffer in the back of the head wasn’t elected by the Palestinians to express their historical grievances. He was just a piece of shit who murdered a handicapped guy. Drawing any connection between the Palestinian history and this disgusting act is definition, 100% anti-Semitic. It justifies the murder of Jews by the most sadistic and disgusting people on Earth. Use all the euphemisms that you want – that it “humanizes” the Palestinians – THAT’s the real bullshit. You don’t need a Shylock nose and a Jewish octopus onstage to send an anti-Semitic message. That the people who chose to see this revolting spectacle in the FIRST PLACE don’t have a problem isn’t relevant, since there is enormous selection bias. Fire Gelb. Boycott the Met. Anti-Semitism will not be mainstreamed in New York City, no matter how hard Derfner et al try.

      Reply to Comment
      • Weiss

        Fascism is on the Far Right

        Comfortable there?

        How quickly WE Jews forget…

        Reply to Comment
      • Andrew

        “Drawing any connection between the Palestinian history and this disgusting act is definition, 100% anti-Semitic”

        You heard it here first, folks! Context is now officially anti-semitic.

        Reply to Comment
      • Bob

        LOL

        Reply to Comment
      • Brian

        “How would +972 leftists react to an opera about the burning alive of a Palestinian teen? What if that Opera opened with an “even-handed” summary of Israeli and Palestinian grievances at the beginning?”

        It would depend on how well it was handled artistically and morally and thematically. Can we put Weiss in charge of writing the first draft?

        Reply to Comment
      • Josh

        That you Richard, have a problem isn’t relevant, you and your load crying twats won’t stop the Met from doing what they do. And that’s good, freedom of art. But I know that facist alays have a problem with freedom of art.

        Reply to Comment
      • Richard Lightbown

        ‘ the most sadistic and disgusting people on Earth’

        Now that really is against Semites: full on with no holds barred.

        Reply to Comment
      • Lev Avraham

        My favorite part of the piece is the insinuation that people shouldn’t comment until they have seen it only for the author to admit he hasn’t seen it!The title itself (death instead of murder)is enough to suggest the play isn’t a neutral analysis of events.

        Reply to Comment
    2. david h

      What’s it like to be so full of hate and ignorance?

      The opera doesn’t justify the murder at all. It shows it as a barbaric and senseless act.

      Remember when The Satanic Verses was published? A portion of the Muslim world went completely nuts. There were riots, protests, and death threats. This was all over something none of the protestors had ever read. All the hatred and ignorance they had got unleashed on a target which now nobody even cares about. You are one of those people.

      The Death of Klinghoffer isn’t anti-semitic. There’s about a billion reviews – you know, people who have actually seen the opera – attesting to that. I mean, there’s a column right above this that does a good job of showing why it’s not anti-semitic. You can deny this. You can continue to revel in your ignorance and use it as fuel for your hatred. No need to let facts get in the way of blind rage.

      “Everyone who has seen it has said it’s not anti-semitic. I have not seen it but I know for a fact it is.” – That’s you. Sounding stupid.

      Do you ever listen to yourself when you call Palestinians “the most sadistic and disgusting people on Earth”? I’m sure there are many in Palestine who think the same of Israelis. Those people are sick and demented. Just like you.

      Reply to Comment
    3. Richard

      Is that a haiku? Looks like gibberish to me.

      Reply to Comment
      • Brian

        On the contrary, Weiss shows admirable clarity and economy of expression.

        Reply to Comment
        • Richard

          When your understanding of “fascism” is Stalinist, you won’t have much to contribute to any conversation, its true.

          Reply to Comment
          • Brian

            Stalinist understandings of fascism. Check. Are you gonna cover that in your Academy lecture on Skateboarding and The Other, Professor? So much to learn!

            Reply to Comment
          • Brian

            Weiss evidently prefers Jewish understandings of fascism. So do I.

            Reply to Comment
          • Weiss

            Thank you for the rational and civil banter. This is a discussion that needs to be in the forefront of Jewish society.

            Considering my grandfather died at the hands of U-155 and capt Cornelius Penning while delivering oil to help defeat the Nazis… Yes I do understand Fascism from a traditional Jewish standpoint.

            Reply to Comment
          • Richard

            Brian – If you think that arias about shooting Jews in the skull isn’t fascist, you don’t have a Jewish understanding of fascism. You have an anti-Semite’s understanding of reality. You have said nothing remotely original or challenging in any comment, so I am done with you. You can’t think for yourself, and you speak only as a parody of the ideological charlatans you try to emulate. Please have the last word on everything from now on.

            Reply to Comment
          • Brian

            By Peter Beinart:

            http://www.haaretz.com/mobile/.premium-1.622145

            Is Israel’s president an anti-Semite?
            President Rivlin just called Israel a ‘sick society.’ If he was an American politician, he’d be probably forced out of his job.

            …the real test of what gets deemed anti-Israel or anti-Semitic, in other words, often turns less on what is said than on who said it. Which makes a statement’s truth largely irrelevant…

            Reply to Comment
    4. Noe

      I’m busy writing a musical play about the beheading of James Foley. We are going to hear songs about how dirty and murderous imperialist Americans really are and we’re going to have a handsome Jihadi sing about the wonders of beheading Americans.

      I’m sure that will go over very well with Larry. After all, Jihadists are people, too, and they deserve to have their voices heard and understood.

      Reply to Comment
      • Brian

        Oh I get it. Hamas = ISIS. Very clever and original.

        Reply to Comment
        • Noe

          Actually, you didn’t get it at all.

          Let’s hope Larry did.

          Reply to Comment
      • Richard Lightbown

        Better still why not write an opera for Kamal Zugheir who was run over in his wheelchair by an Israeli tank at Jenin? Or quadriplegic Jamal Fayid, also of Jenin, who was crushed to death in the rubble of his home by a 64-tonne armoured Israeli bulldozer? Needless to say both were non-combatants. I’m sure you will better understand the motives of their murderers so that you can more accurately portray their point of view.

        Reply to Comment
    5. Lo

      “Hey, art is art, and free expression is a general good that operates best without narrow, political constraints.”

      “I CANT BELIEVE HOW BIASED AND ANTISEMITIC YOU ARE. CAN WE NOW MAKE AN OPERA ABOUT A KID FORCED TO DRINK GASOLINE AND SET ON FIRE? IS THAT WHAT YOU LEFTISTS WANT?!”

      Personally, I feel that you should go ahead. If you can make a complex, rich piece, all the more power to you. I think you would make a crude snuff flick, but that’s because I think the israel defense force has completely misunderstood Mr. Derfner’s article, as is so unfortunately often the case.

      Reply to Comment
    6. Emma

      The only thing I found more distressing than the opinions expressed in this article was the way it was written. If you would like to be taken seriously as a writer, please make an effort to clean up your sentences.

      Reply to Comment
    7. Click here to load previous comments