+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

Kitsch, death and god at Israel's Education Ministry

The Israeli education minister’s letter to the graduating class of 2014 is evidence of the fact that Israeli education is little more than an ongoing IDF preparatory course.

By Avner Ben-Amos (translated from Hebrew by Miriam Erez)

A letter to the high school class of 2014 published by Israeli Education Minister Shai Piron in the July 24, 2014 issue of Israel Hayom is a worrying wakeup call. A wakeup call because the education minister presents a worldview that rests on distorted, revisionist history. Worrying because this minister determines, directly or indirectly, how our schoolchildren perceive their reality. Even if only a few of them end up reading the letter, written as a farewell to last year’s graduates, it is quite instructive regarding the minister and his positions, and is therefore worth analyzing.

Let’s begin with the headline. “Only our wars are wars of no choice”, states the minister with undisguised glee. It’s a statement reminiscent of the arbitrary one by Elazar Stern, former chief IDF education officer, that, the IDF is “the world’s most moral army,” after obviously studying, measuring, and comparing all of the world’s armies and determining our ethical ranking among them.

Education Minister Shai Piron (Source: Yesh Atid/Wikimedia Commons) December 2, 2012

Education Minister Shai Piron (Source: Yesh Atid/Wikimedia Commons) December 2, 2012

But beyond that, Minister Piron ignores the fact that all of our wars since 1967 – including the most recent one in Gaza – were intended to clinch our control over the occupied territories, all of which make them wars of choice, including the first Lebanon War, whose architect, Menachem Begin, declared it as such. And if we work backward we even find that the 1956 Sinai Campaign was a war of choice that Israel joined together with the declining imperialist powers of France and Britain.

Another wild statement in Piron’s letter is, “We’re the only country that on the day of its founding, did not rejoice in the defeat of its enemies, but rather extended its hand in peace.” Considering that hundreds of thousands of Palestinian refugees expelled by the IDF in 1948 were left on the other side of the border and not permitted to return home, it’s not clear how we extended our hand in peace. This statement also elucidates Piron’s ongoing refusal to allow Arab schools to mention the word nakba in their curricula, referring to the displacement of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians during Israel’s creation. It surely isn’t a cynical plot to erase the Palestinians’ national identity, but rather simple ignorance, which lucky for us, a mere skimming of Benny Morris’ book, The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem, 1947-1949, can remedy.

Moving on, the claim of equal rights granted to the Arab minority, while correct as per Israel’s Declaration of Independence, has remained only ink on parchment. Beyond the inherent discrimination in, for instance, the Law of Return, which grants Jews the world over immediate citizenship, a quick glance at the figures for allotment of resources and socioeconomic positioning shows that the Arab population is at the bottom in all rankings. Piron’s decision to move funds from the Orthodox Jewish sector to the Arab sector – for which he is to be commended – shows that even he is aware of the ongoing systemic discrimination.

Nor can we ignore the cloying, kitschy tone underlying the letter, whose importance should not be minimized. Kitsch, as Milan Kundera explained, is a type of aesthetic “…that denies completely the less-than-pleasant,” i.e., it neatly eliminates any real grappling with difficulties, and blocks skepticism and questioning. Thus we read in Piron’s letter of “the weeping eye” and the other eye “that believes in the good to come”; of King David, who was “a warrior, yet who gently plucked the strings of his harp, which calmed his mood”; and of “the courageous commanders who display sensitivity toward an elderly man in need of assistance.”

What does Piron’s kitschy attitude hide? It is now clear that the minister who introduced the civic studies theme, “The other is me” as the theme of the past school year, is now demonstrating his blindness to the Palestinian “other,” who lies outside his close circle. Piron doesn’t hesitate to throw around clichés about the “eternal Jewish people” and “our eternal Land,” all while ignoring the fact that since 1967 we have subjugated another people who sees “our eternal Land” as its land, too.

Moreover, beyond an oblique reference to “superfluous hatred and bigotry among us and between us and our neighbors,” there is no explicit mention in the letter of the rabid hostility against both Arabs and Jewish leftists that permeated the country this summer following the murder of three Jewish teens in the West Bank, not to mention calls on the parts of politicians and rabbis to crush, flatten, destroy and wipe out Gaza ahead of and during the war. And not a word, of course, about the destruction and killing wrought by the IDF in Gaza even as those words were being penned.

Yet what’s most worrying of all is the blindered horizon that the minister sees for the class of 2014: he reinforces all those who claim that our school system is nothing but an IDF prep course. That prep course, of course, includes the internalization of the lesson of force “taught” by the Holocaust, which now begins as early as preschool with an introduction to the evil Hitler – brought to your preschooler by none other than Piron’s program – and ends with high school study trips to Poland and IDF officers brought into schools as guest teachers in civics classes.

Piron sees our 2014 grads as nothing but soldiers in uniform patrolling Gaza; “thousands of them, fueled with a sense of mission and driven by mutual responsibility.” He addresses them directly: “in Bible class, you learned of our battles to conquer the Land.” That’s right: welcome to the Book of Joshua and verses such as, “those in the ambush also came out of the city against them, so that they were caught in the middle, with Israelites on both sides. Israel cut them down, leaving them neither survivors nor fugitives” (Joshua 8:22).

Piron, who loves to quote from scripture, ends his letter to the soldiers-to-be with the Prayer for a Safe Journey. In normal times, it could be viewed as an innocuous ending, even natural for someone who wears a yarmulke – except these are not normal times. When Givati Brigade Commander Ofer Winter defined our latest war as a battle against “the Gazan terrorist enemy who curses, abuses and reviles the god of the hosts of Israel,” he transformed a national conflict into a religious one, conferring upon the rabbis the ultimate authority in all things battle-related.

This phenomenon dovetails neatly with the proposal in the “Basic Law: Israel: State of the Jewish Nation,” to make Jewish law the “inspiration” for our legal system, as well as Piron’s cockamamie idea to assign rabbis to schools as “spiritual instructors.” It’s an ambitious vision, and unfortunately one that’s far from delusional: shaping the three main entities that are controlled by the state – the army, the schools and the legal system – into entities controlled by clergy. While I’m not convinced that Piron would want it, it’s directly where we’re headed, and he’s at the forefront of the march.

Prof. Avner Ben-Amos is a lecturer in the history of education at Tel Aviv University. This article was first published in Hebrew on Haokets.

Related:
Student’s ‘political persecution’ of teacher reaches national stage
WATCH: From Holocaust to revival – shaping the IDF’s future conscripts

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article
  • LEAVE A COMMENT

    * Required

    COMMENTS

    1. Pedro X

      Readers need to understand that Prof Ben-Amos has held views consistently outside the Israeli consensus of the left, center and right. He has supported lecturers and students refusing IDF duty. He has called for the international community to send a force to stop Israel from its occupation of the West Bank. He has supported organizations for BDS. He supported full freedom of movement by Palestinians inside Israel despite security risk thereof. He belongs to organizations which lobby against Israel.

      Given his background, it is not surprising to see him write that all of Israel’s wars have been ones of choice. He said:

      “all of our wars since 1967 – including the most recent one in Gaza – were intended to clinch our control over the occupied territories, all of which make them wars of choice…”

      In 1967 Israel specifically told Jordan to keep out of the war, and if it did, it would not be attacked. If Israel intended this war to obtain control of territory, this was a strange method of doing so.

      The 1973 war was not about gaining territory. Israel was attacked by the Arab world again. As in 1948 this was an existential war.

      The 1982 war was a war of choice. The choice was invade Lebanon and drive out or destroy the PLO army which was conducting a war of attrition against northern Israel and sending terrorist into Israel or allow the PLO to continue to carry out terrorist attacks against Israel.

      The intifada wars were wars to stop Palestinians from killing Israeli citizens.

      The 2006 war was a war started by Hezbollah and had nothing to do with Israel consolidating control over the West Bank or Gaza. Israel had left Gaza completely in 2005.

      2008, 2012 and 2014 were all wars of aggression started by Hamas. In all three wars Israel warned Hamas of the consequences of continuing with rocket fire on Israel. In 2008 and 2014 Hamas did not heed the warnings. In none of the three wars did Israel attempt to retake Gaza and impose its control on its citizens.

      Given his anti-IDF service background, it is not surprising that Ben-Amos would also attack any program which or speaker who teaches the Israeli view of history of its state and wars with its neighbors. In 2011 he attacked a school plan to link Israeli students to Jewish history by visiting and taking care of Jewish cemeteries and monuments.

      Reply to Comment
      • sh

        Disingenuous Pedro X to have stirred clashes that Israel itself called “operations” or “campaigns” into the mix. Standard Hasbara Ministry technology.

        All the clashes with Hamas, for instance have been operations (not wars) that were given kitschy names to prove it; they were battles in a much larger war that has been going on since 1948, against a historical fact that is unfortunately true, i.e. that Palestinians were coerced by the new Israel, using means predominantly foul, to “persuade” them to flee their villages in 1948, and weren’t allowed back.

        Which leads us back to Shai Piron’s kitschy, deadly and uneducational letter to high school graduates.

        Reply to Comment
    2. Average American

      Ok let’s say all you say about the author is true. Now tell me what’s this about “conquering the Land” (capital L), is Piron talking about “The Land Of Israel”? That’s a Zionist phrase. Netanyahu talks about that too. What is The Land Of Israel? What does it look like on a map? Isn’t it alot bigger than the current State of Israel? Begin showed us on his Irgun posters. And what’s this about halaka law being the law of the Land? That’s a Zionist concept too, right?

      Reply to Comment
    3. ***If Israel intended this war to obtain control of territory, this was a strange method of doing so.***

      Strange or not, that this so-called ‘pre-emptive attack’ was in fact a premeditated act of land theft is self-evident today: the WB is still occupied and increasingly colonised, the Golan Heights are de facto annexed by Israel.

      ***He belongs to organizations which lobby against Israel.***

      …is hardly a counter-argument. You belong to organizations which lobby for Israel. What good for the goose…

      Reply to Comment
    4. Piron’s vision for the education of Israel’s youth on ‘Start Up Nation’s’ own Genesis and its subsequent trajectory to this day is not surprising and not particularly unique to Israel either.

      Even here in Britain, so many decades after that fact, entire mythologies are being peddled re. Britain’s part in WW II, despite a well documented body of evidence presented by excellent British historians that paints a far more nuanced picture.

      Nationalism depends in good part on kitchy versions of reality, whether that Nationalism was Nazism, British Nationalism or Zionism…

      Reply to Comment