+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

J14 activists launch political party, radical by Israeli standards

The party has been defined the “parliamentarian branch” of the struggle for social justice, and its initial platform includes promotion of direct democracy, public control over natural resources and the financial system, and an end to the military regime in the occupied territories and all other forms of discrimination.

J14 protesters burn government reports that weren’t implemented, Tel Aviv, July 7, 2012 (photo: activestills.org)

Some 200 activists gathered in a south Tel Aviv warehouse last Thursday to launch the “parliamentarian branch” of the J14 movement for social justice in Israel – i.e., a political party. Following the event, a new (Hebrew) website was put up with the party’s very initial guidelines for an agenda, and activists are now planning to get more people to join and develop the platform further.

In mapping out the different parts of J14, one can say that the people behind this initiative are the more radical and independent faction, the one which strongly opposes the focus given by other groups only to the suffering of the middle class. It also calls for solidarity instead of militarism in the matter of “equal burden-sharing” of military service, and with those activists who declared their refusal to serve in the army due to the economic state of affairs. It is also the faction that has been steering away from both the more mainstream Labor (Avoda) and Yair Lapid party events, while at the same time keeping a careful distance from its more immediate partners in Hadash (the front that includes the Communist Party).

Roughly speaking, this is the faction that successfully led several thousand people out into the streets on leaderless marches mainly in Tel Aviv’s streets, without funding or speakers. It seems safe to say that it includes people from various backgrounds (though all are Jewish) who have undergone political radicalization over the past year by way of collective learning from the harsh social reality, and who have not found their place within the existing political system. Confrontations were more than once reported between this group and Hadash and Meretz activists who brought their party signs to demonstrations.

Now, however, it seems that activists are ready to try changing the system from within, or as they put it in their platform: “To enter the Knesset in order to disperse it and bring about popular elections for a democratic-federal constitution to change the system of government, social organization and the economy in Israel.”

J14 protest in Tel Aviv assembling in Habimah Square, June 23, 2012 (photo: activestills.org)

Attempts at a new political discourse

The preliminary platform and other texts available on the movement/party’s site suggest a radical worldview, at the same time making use of concepts that are new to Israeli political discourse. For example, while no mention is made of the word “occupation” and no solution is offered to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the platform does suggest the notion, revolutionary in local terms, that “equality will apply to every person living under Israeli rule.”

Similarly, touching on the question of the “Jewish-democratic state,” activists go to lengths to explain the changes they see as necessary for the political system, while essentially pronouncing the end of Zionism as we know it and promising collective rights for Jews (and all other national or religious collectives). This notion I shall soon elaborate on in a separate post.

The platform also doesn’t offer any kind of step-by-step plan for the economy, yet speaks clearly about public control (as opposed to state control) of natural resources and the financial system, and about democratization of work places, including sharing profits with workers. In all three examples above, writers of the platform use simple wording, and insist on demonstrating how these principles are the required outcome of any position of equality and social justice.

The party’s positions are not easy to place within the current political map of Israeli society. First of all, because much like the Pirate parties in post-crisis Europe, it puts great emphasis on changing the entire system of governance, promoting transparency and direct democracy, and shifting to social modules based on “open source” techniques.

In addition, the party tends towards a very libertarian discourse, focusing on complete freedom for the individual, yet escapes the capitalist-individualist nature of most such agendas by stressing the notion of strong community-based networks and high levels of equality, to be protected by the system. In this sense, it is most certainly a radical left party. In a way, one can say the new party echoes prominent elements from the Western “occupy” movements (such as the resistance to any recognizable leaders) while mixing them with unique local political conditions.

Kikar Hamedina - March of Million - 3.9.11 -4

Will they reach the masses of last year? Kikar Hamedina – March of Million – 3.9.11

 A promise with many challenges

I think that the basic platform currently put forward by the still nameless party does a good job at capturing the spirit of the very first days of J14 from last summer, as I and others tried to lay out at the time. It redefines the notion of “the people” in this land, and challenges the existing political system with a new discourse that successfully avoids leftist elitism and that is very communicative to the Israeli public. In that sense, this is a very promising step.

However, at the same time, one cannot ignore the massive barriers standing in this movement’s way. It will have to overcome the growing hostility to J14 by the once protest-friendly mainstream media; to re-ignite optimism and a belief in the future within the hundreds of thousands (or even millions) who trusted in the possibility of change last summer and now are more skeptical; and more than anything else it will have to tackle the greatest challenge in the Israeli left: to build bridges of cooperation between Palestinians and Jews against the prevailing racist hegemony without losing ground and relevancy within the wider Jewish public.

These are heavy tasks to take on, with few chances of success, yet they are without a doubt important ones, which, dealt with properly, might contribute greatly to the development of Israeli civil society.

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article

    * Required


    1. Ben


      Thanks for informing the world about this event. I am really curious to know what the similarities and differences are between this currently nameless party and Meretz and Hadash. If there are no Arabs in this party it seems there is more similarities with Meretz, but I am open to your thoughts. What kind of social policies are they striving to change? You did not mention housing, cost of living in general, though you are concerned with the occupation here somewhat, though I imagine the issue is infinitely more divisible that housing and other social issues. Plus, it would be interesting if some of these supporters are from the “shtahim” like Maa’le Adumim or Alfei Menashe, which, let’s face is–are not going to be part of any “return” anyway.

      Reply to Comment
      • niv

        good question

        Reply to Comment
    2. Aaron

      This seems like a smart idea. A political party is very helpful for a movement.
      If you want to “build bridges of cooperation between Palestinians and Jews,” though, my advice is to drop the slogans about “equality will apply to every person living under Israeli rule.” If I were a Palestinian, I’d be pretty worried about slogans like that.

      Reply to Comment
    3. Prometheus

      It was rather obvious that sooner or later some political party will arise to actually try and make some changes.
      The problem, however, that the most important issues which are untouchable by now, will remain so and the party won’t be able to do much besides some populist moves.
      Within foreseeable future (10-15 years at least I’d say) they won’t be able to do anything with bodies like Electric Company, Mekorot or Elit, nor will they be able to really lower any prices on the market, neither implement equal draft to all citizens.
      Simply – they won’t have enough support. Arabs and religious Jews certainly won’t vote for them, Russians probably will not as well… neither will population of cities such as Beer Sheva or Atlit – there is nothing to offer them but some social programs, which will cost a lot without any benefits.
      It’s not that I would not want to see some changes – I’d love to, but it ain’t gonna happen, definitely not until the establishment of the Palestinian state and couple more very important events.

      Reply to Comment
    4. XYZ

      When I hear about political themes like those written above, I automatically am reminded of George Orwell’s “Animal Farm”.
      For example, what does it mean that there is going to be “public control of natural resources”? Who represents “the public”? During the 1950’s, the political slogan was “In Israel, the working class rules”…which meant the MAPAI-MAPAM and Histradrut political machines controlled the country and, in the end, this lead to massive fraud and the theft of millions of dollars of the people’s money. Or take the old, unlamented USSR…the Communist Party also claimed to rule in the name of “the people”, or “the proletariat”. The USSR ultimately collapsed from internal rot and in Israel, much of the real working class supported the right-wing Likud.
      Regarding the control of natural resources…let’s look at the natural gas finds out in the Mediterranean. If the wealthy Mr Teshuva and his partners had not invested a lot of money in exploration and experimental drilling, “the public” wouldn’t even know there is any gas there, so what is wrong with Mr Teshuva and his partners getting the profits, as long as they pay a fair share in taxation? Being rich is not a crime…it is the rich people who invest money and create jobs and scaring them into leaving the country by draconian taxation or regulation will harm everyone. Capitalism has proven to work better than state control of industry AS LONG as there is fair competition, fair taxation of profits and fair treatment for their workers who have the right to organize for everyone’s benefit.

      I also get nervous when political platforms talk about “overturning the whole system and building up a new one from scratch”. Parliamentary democracy is, as Churchill said, the worst form of government except for all the others. While there is room for tinkering with the system (for example, going to a constituency system for electing the Knesset instead of using the current party-list proportional system will make the MK’s more responsive to their voters), making giant upheavals always makes things worse.

      In any event, Israel’s foreign policy and security dilemmas will always be the main issue until the Mashiach will come and they will be the main driving force in the elections. The Left is badly divided between anti-Zionists, post-Zionists and pro-Zionists who can’t agree on these basic issues, so such a movement as described above will never get much traction.

      Reply to Comment