+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

Israel's double standard on cross-border loyalties

The arrest of journalist Majd Kayyal is a troubling example of Israel’s fear of ties between its own Arab population and the Palestinian Authority, while claiming the right to have similar ties with Jews around the world.

The main segment in the Shin Bet’s (Israeli Security Agency) official comment on the detention of journalist and activist Majd Kayyal for nearly five days, without the possibility of meeting his lawyers and under a strict gag order, reads as follows:

In his interrogation it became clear that [Kayyal] left for Lebanon in order to attend a convention of the Lebanese newspaper As-Safir, all the while knowing that it is an enemy state that Israeli citizens are forbidden to enter. The subject has even sought the assistance of the Palestinian Authority in Ramallah, which he contacted for [travel] documentation to Lebanon, in spite of his being an Israeli citizen. The subject entered Lebanon using the Palestinian documentation he was given.

As Dimi Reider mentioned in his post, and as Einat Fishbein claims in her interview with Israeli journalist Itay Engel [Hebrew], the mere passage of Israeli citizens, mainly journalists, into what is legally defined as “enemy states” is not an irregular action, and is most commonly overlooked by authorities. So what is different about Kayyal’s case? It isn’t just that he is Palestinian, but rather the fact that as a citizen of Israel he chose to obtain a second passport – a Palestinian one from the Palestinian Authority – and used it to enter Lebanon. (Entering Lebanon with an Israeli passport is completely impossible.) The story, then, is the wounding of Israel’s national pride, its feeling of hampered sovereignty over its “subjects,” as Kayyal is called in the Shin Bet’s comment.

This knee-jerk reaction is not uncommon in Israel. It is most commonly seen in East Jerusalem, where authorities crack down on anything that smells remotely of PA involvement, including a children’s puppet theater. Recently, we’ve seen it in the extreme political and public sensitivity regarding the unfulfilled promise to release Palestinian prisoners with Israeli citizenship as part of negotiations. Time and time again the issue of sovereignty is brought up as a reason to prevent all ties between Palestinians in Israel and the PA; it is also in part the basis for Netanyahu’s insistence on recognition of Israel as “a Jewish State.” (Well, that and his will to maintain the status quo for as long as possible.)

However, at the same time that the state and its security forces fight to maintain full and unconditional control over Palestinian citizens and residents, barring the possibility of dual citizenship and cross-border loyalties and affiliations, it also purports to be the sole representative of Jews anywhere in the world. Not only does Israeli law allow anyone with Jewish heritage to gain full citizenship (the kind that Palestinians living their entire lives under military rule can never obtain), the state also funds Jewish and Zionist religious, cultural and political enterprises worldwide, while encouraging Jewish migration to Israel and intervening in the affairs of other countries to protect Jews from anti-Semitism.

The point of all this is not to say that Jews should not be allowed safe refuge or that it’s wrong for Israel to fight racism and violence and support local cultural initiatives across the world. But taking all of that into account, how can it still resist the right of the Palestinian Authority to support the interests of Palestinian citizens of Israel?

Related:
Arab journalist freed after being held incommunicado by Israel
Why a Jewish state cannot fully protect its non-Jewish citizens

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article
  • LEAVE A COMMENT

    * Required

    COMMENTS

    1. Samuel

      “how can it still resist the right of the Palestinian Authority to support the interests of Palestinian citizens of Israel?”

      For the record, it is not the right of the PA that Israel curbed. It curbed the right of it’s own Israeli citizens to interact with the PA. There is a huge difference.

      Spot the difference …

      Although right now there is no hot war, Israel is in a formal state of war with it’s neighbours. Lebanon AND the PA. Neither has signed a peace treaty yet and the way things are going they are unlikely to do so for a long time to come.

      Israel is in peace with all the countries where Jews live so there should be no reason to criminalize Jews who have ties with Israel.

      That is why the comparison in this article misses the mark entirely.

      Reply to Comment
    2. Rehmat

      I must admit I was treated well at Jordan-Israel crossing when I went to Jerusalem in 1995. But my fellow engineer from Jordan was not that lucky. May be, because, I’m a non-Palestinian Canadian, while my friend was born into a Palestinian family which escaped Zionist terrorists in 1948.

      http://rehmat1.com/2013/12/01/un-condemns-israel-six-times-in-one-day/

      Reply to Comment
    3. Rab

      Glad to read 972 writers who openly support Lieberman’s desire to shift Israel’s borders by placing them to the west of a number of large Arab villages. Indeed, if the Palestinian Authority cares for the interests of Israeli Arabs as if they were their own (while ignoring Lebanese and Syrian Arabs of Palestinian descent whose conditions are 20 times worse than any Israeli Arab’s), then why not move that imaginary border line over a little bit and allow the two sides to become one again?

      Reply to Comment