+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

Israelis' xenophobia, in their own words

Israel’s most widely circulated newspaper covers the growing tide of hate for asylum seekers. Israelis try to portray these “foreigners”, who number 0.4% of the country’s population, as a dangerous burden, but it seems refugees fleeing genocide have more to fear from Israelis than the other way around

Yedioth Aharonoth, Israel’s most widely circulated newspaper, is covering, for the second day in a row, the tidal wave of racism which is gripping the country. The tone of coverage is strangely ambiguous in a nation where every sentence seems to end with an exclamation mark. It is as if the editors want to stop this terrible trend, yet at the same time know that many of their readers are part of the problem, and do not want to alienate them.

Yesterday, the newspaper courageously combined numerous cases of exclusions: of asylum seekers, of Israeli Arabs, of Jewish Ethiopians, and even of disabled people. On the other hand, it also published on its front page an appalling op-ed by Yair Lapid, one of their columnists, an evening news presenter, and the son of a former government minister, with political aspirations of his own. In the article, Lapid lamented the extra burden asylum seekers add to already impoverished localities in Israel, amplified by the fact that the government completely neglects these refugees and does not provide them even with the most basic services.

His solution was not, god forbid, to treat asylum seekers better or invest in those localities (a good idea regardless of the refugee situation). He did not even suggest housing refugees in lucrative neighborhoods, like the one where he resides (although, actually, some of them are already there – you just don’t hear about it, because that would spoil the narrative). Instead, he insisted they should be kept out. Lapid, like his late father, combines a penchant to obsessively mention the holocaust with complete amnesia about this event’s most important lessons.

Today, the coverage is similarly conflicted, although leaning in a better direction (perhaps the reaction to yesterday’s stories was not as bad as the editors feared?). The inner pages include stories that are predictably obsessed with the need to keep out and kick out as many refugees as possible, as if it is obvious that Israel is collapsing under the burden of 30,000 people of a population of 7.6 million (not even including occupied Palestinians. Hey, why don’t we send refugees there?). Eilat mayor, Meir Yitzhak Halevy, suggests closing up the city, and if the fence on the Egyptian border makes no progress, perhaps, he proposes, we should just build a fence and gates around Eilat to prevent further “infiltrators” from entering the city.

The front page, on the other hand, tells a different story. It features an op-ed, including an accompanying picture, written by a Sudanese refugee, and titled “Do not be afraid of me”. It is a moving and compelling appeal, and the very decision to publish it, with such emphasis, is commendable.

However, it is the immediately succeeding pages where the most important story unfolds. First, there is a short article comparing claims by the police that crime in the asylum seekers population is increasing, with an analysis by the Knesset Research Center, based on police data, showing that crime rates are actually substantially lower than among the general population.

The immediately adjacent person-on-the-street interviews confirm the impression that fear of asylum seekers is not connected to any actual crimes, but to blatant xenophobia. The following are some choice quotes from Israel 2010 (good thing this year is ending). All the emphases are mine.

Ana, a 13 year old from the southern town of Arad:

I am afraid of them. I heard they tried to rob someone and ended up beating him to death. Who knows what they can do?They should be expelled from the town.

A cop in Ashdod (where five refugees just barely escaped with their lives after an arson attack):

There are no unusual cases of violence or vandalism, but our feeling is that everything is terribly explosive here.

Moshe, Ashdod, says the neighborhood kids no longer come out of their homes in the evenings:

Now their parents won’t let them anymore… Suddenly there are hundreds of foreigners here. It is true they do not hurt anyone and are overall good people, but it is still unpleasant.

A Tel Aviv resident tells the story of a Jewish father to a baby:

After five or six times that they sat in front of his house and made noise, and he called the police and went out and asked them to be quiet – he became desperate. One night he [the Israeli] went out with a springboard and just beat the crap out of them [the asylum seekers]. It is a miracle none of them [the asylum seekers] drew a knife or a bottle and killed him [the Israeli].

Are we not all truly grateful no harm befell the stick-wielding maniac violently assaulting people because they make noise?

Now, you tell me, who is dangerous and who should be afraid?

Read more on racism and intolerance in Israel from +972:

Netanyahu warns against out of control racism in Israel, by Joseph Dana

How the mayor (of a Nazareth suburb) stole Christmas, by Yuval Ben-Ami

We came to protest racism & wound up keeping a city Jewish, by Yuval Ben-Ami

Israeli MKs impotent in the face of racism, by Mairav Zonszein  

Fear and loathing in Israel 2010, by Ami Kaufman

 

 

 

 

 

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article
  • LEAVE A COMMENT

    * Required

    COMMENTS

    1. David

      If Israel is such a terrible place to live in for Muslims as you claim, than why do Muslim Sudanese come here in the first place and not settle down in one of the Arab states closer to home?

      U paint a bleak picture. but they still come and desire to settle down here.

      Perhaps they should read your hateful articles more often

      Reply to Comment
    2. Mark

      Why is criticism of Israel always described as hateful or anti-semitic? I find this stange. Surely if Israel wants to be seen and accepted as a democracy with equal rights for all it’s people then it should also be criticised for when they treat non-Jews in this manner? Racism in Israel exists and simply calling the article hateful without addressing the issues raised does not bode well for an Israel that wants to portray itself as a democracy that upholds and respects human rights for all people irrespective of their religion.

      Reply to Comment
    3. Y.

      Roi usually write solidly (if usually not describing the entire picture), but here I believe he strays a bit far:

      A. According to the Knesset’s report[1], the complete burden (Roi’s term) is 220,000 (3%) and not 30,000 (0.4%). Roi is counting the number of asylum seekers alone (though the actual number of that is a bit higher than 30k), but the debate is on a larger group.

      B. Ergo, the vast majority of people talked about are not refugees according to any standard.

      C. Lastly, maybe if some people on the Left side didn’t exploit this issue for other purposes, like say, changing the definition of the state[2], maybe there’d be less worry.

      P.S. There’s a lot of exclusion in Israeli society, but curiously, you omit Yediot’s mention of the exclusion practiced by your social group** vs the Ultra-Orthodox.

      [1]
      http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-3999018,00.html

      [2]
      (Look at the signs in the back)
      http://rotter.net/User_files/forum/4d03ae9e0c17d8091.jpg

      ** I don’t know Roi, I’m just using his self-description in his second last article.

      Reply to Comment
    4. @Y. :
      (1) sorry, but putting anyone in a concentration camp regardless of why they came to the holy-land is not a holy-act. fact is that they’re receiving the treatment they are because they aren’t jewish and that is known as racism (or should i call “people-ism” since we are the ‘jewish people’?)
      other fact is that there is a group inside of them that have escaped war-torn countries and we don’t seem very bothered about that like someone who studied our history might think we would be.
      (2) shas is using them to argue for a theocracy, liberman is using them to argue for a fascist state, so why isn’t it ok for the left to use them to argue for their own agenda?

      Reply to Comment
    5. Y.

      Tahel:

      First, there are no “concentration camps” here, and this nonsensical use trivializes the holocaust.

      Second, sure, exploit them for your own agenda but don’t get shocked when the backlash sets in and targets both them and your side. I do note you are using Shas and Lieberman as a moral authority**.

      Third, I do notice you accept my argument that we are not speaking over only 30,000 people.

      ** Ironically, I’ve never heard anything from Shas using the immigrants to argue for theocracy and same respectively from Lieberman, but I’ll be glad to be enlightened.

      Reply to Comment
    6. David

      @Mark The word “hateful” is not stronger than the rhetorics used in this article

      Saying “Racism in Israel exists” is true i guess, This is somewhat a common issue when you have people around, and writing an anti racism article is like writing an anti-glacier book (to paraphrase Vonnegut)

      The facts are that Israel’s policy in this matter is fully aligned with international law, some people have difficulty with their new neighbors, a surprise indeed

      Reply to Comment
    7. […] מבחינת המסיתים ומבחינת המוסתים כאחד, אין הבדל בין הפליטים ובין הערבים. שניהם זרים ושניהם מאיימים – תודעתית, אם לא במציאות. רועי מאור מביא שורה של ציטוטים מצוינים בנושא. […]

      Reply to Comment
    8. Shenhav

      Yes Roi. Xenophobia is awful. But I wonder why you always talk about Israelis’ xenophobia, but refrain from mentioning Palestinians’ xenophobia, especially against Jews. I am expecting your answer.

      Reply to Comment
    9. […] developed world. This can lead to some paradoxical situations. For example, as Roi Maor of Bimkom points out, the wave of xenophobia in Israel is far more dangerous to the African refugees than they are to […]

      Reply to Comment