Appreciate this article? +972 depends on your support.

Click here to help us keep going

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

Israel won't become part of the Middle East until the occupation ends

The chance of Israel’s re-admittance to the Middle East lies in its ability to show initiative, originality and flexibility of thought. Only by attempting sincerely to solve the Palestinian problem will it have a chance to become a public and recognized player.

Prof. Elie Podeh

A few months ago, former Justice Minister Tzipi Livni traveled in secret to New York to a meeting attended by the foreign ministers of several Arab countries, Arab League officials and European foreign ministers. The topic of the meeting was the formulation of a regional coalition, or cooperation, against ISIS. Participation of an official Israeli representative of such a call marked a significant achievement in Israel’s foreign policy, and confirms that the post-Arab Spring developments in the region have created an opportunity for Israel to forge new alliances and coalitions with regional actors. Recently, it has been revealed that Foreign Minister Liberman secretly met Arab and Palestinians officials in Paris with the aim of promoting a regional initiative. In light of the diplomatic impasse, this is good news.

Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman (photo: Yotam Ronen / activestills)

Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman. Why won’t Israel’s leaders hold public meetings with their Arab counterparts? (photo: Yotam Ronen / activestills)

The bad news is that these exchanges are held in the dark. This once again highlights the fact that Israel is still suffering from a “mistress syndrome” in the Middle East— relations with her must be kept a secret.

Since its existence, Israel has conducted secret contracts with individuals and countries in the Middle East. Common interests led to occasional cooperation, which needed to be hidden so as not to endanger the collaborators. Jordan’s King Abdullah and his grandson King Hussein held many talks with Israeli leaders. Abdullah even paid with his life for secret contacts that almost led to the first ever peace agreement with an Arab country. Even ties in the late 1950s and early 1960s between Israel, Turkey, Iran, Ethiopia and perhaps Sudan—the so-called “Periphery Alliance”—were kept secret.

Cooperation in the 1950s was designed to combat the threat posed to the Middle East by the pan-Arab ideology under the leadership of Egypt’s Gamal Abdel Nasser. Thus, for example, Israel was covertly involved in the Yemeni civil war of the 1960s, in which it helped royalists in their struggle against the republican regime backed by Nasser. Israel also secretly helped the Kurds in Iraq in their fight against the Ba’ath regime in the mid-1960s.

Israel later aided the Maronites in Lebanon, although when that cooperation came to light in the Lebanon War in 1982, the Maronites were alienated. Even the Egyptians and Palestinians held many secret talks with Israeli before any formal agreements were signed. And since publishing of the Arab Peace Initiative of 2002, there have been scattered clues of meetings between Israeli and Saudi representatives.

Read: 100 ex-generals tell Bibi to reach peace agreement now

The only period in which Israel managed to escape the “mistress syndrome” was following the signing of the Oslo Accords in 1993. The decade of the 1990s was a golden age in Israel’s relations with countries in the region; it had diplomatic relations at various levels not only with Egypt and Jordan, but also with Morocco, Tunisia, Mauritania and a host of states in the Persian Gulf. Cooperation between Israel and Turkey reached its peak during that time, and a number of regional economic conferences brought public meetings between Israeli and Arab businessmen.

Though there were still many in the Arab world who refused to see Israel as part of the Middle East, the Oslo Accords broke the barrier of fear and allowed many Arabs to have public relations with Israel and Israelis. Yet this positive development was reversed with the failure of the Oslo and the outbreak of the Second Intifada. Israel was then relegated back to its traditional status of the concubine of the Middle East in public.

The Nobel Peace Prize laureates for 1994 in Oslo. (From right to left) Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, Foreign Minister Shimon Peres and PLO Chairman Yasser Arafat. October 12, 1994. (Photo by GPO/Ya’acov Sa’ar)

The Nobel Peace Prize laureates for 1994 in Oslo. (From right to left) Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, Foreign Minister Shimon Peres and PLO Chairman Yasser Arafat. October 12, 1994. (Photo by GPO/Ya’acov Sa’ar)

Israel has suffered from this syndrome for most of its existence; it dovetailed with the Jewish history of living in the ghetto (in Eastern Europe) or the mellah (in Morocco). However, this is not an act of fate. The history of the Oslo Accords in the 1990s shows that Israel is not doomed to isolation and boycott, but rather that isolation and boycott are also the result of its actions. No progress on the Palestinian problem, the insensitivity shown by the decision-makers in continuing settlement activity, and particularly the rejection of the Arab Peace Initiative – all these actions damage Israel interests in the Middle East.

The chance of Israel’s re-admittance to the Middle East lies in its ability to show initiative, originality and flexibility of thought. Only by attempting sincerely to solve the Palestinian problem will Israel have a chance to become a public and recognized player. It is unclear how Balaam’s biblical curse, “They are a people that shall dwell alone, and shall not be reckoned among the nations” (Numbers 23:9) has become the motto of so many in Israel. A more worthy motto comes from Israel’s second Prime Minister, Moshe Sharett, who said that “Israel shall not be a people that dwells alone, not in the Middle East and not among the nations of the world.” This should be the guiding light of Israeli policy-makers.

Professor Podeh teaches in the Islamic and Middle Eastern Studies Department at the Hebrew University, and is a Board Member at Mitvim – The Israeli Institute for Regional Foreign Policies. A Hebrew version of this article first appeared in Haaretz

Related:
The hand that holds the status quo together
Security Council’s election message to Israelis: Keep ignoring the occupation

For additional original analysis and breaking news, visit +972 Magazine's Facebook page or follow us on Twitter. Our newsletter features a comprehensive round-up of the week's events. Sign up here.

View article: AAA
Share article
Print article
  • LEAVE A COMMENT

    * Required

    COMMENTS

    1. Mikesailor

      The problem is that Israel can never allow the occupation to end. The reasons are two-fold: 1) Any real negotiation would entail a certain amount of respect and goodwill among the participants which Zionism essentially refutes; every deal must be a zero sum gain for the Zionists who will continue to seek ways to undermine whatever agreement is reached. Racial superiority is the name of the game therefore any deal is purely transactional in nature and can be changed at any time. Look at the Geneva Conventions and the prohibition into moving civilian populations into “occupied territories”, to see Israel’s adherence to any international convention. And: 2) without the “existential” threat, there would be nothing holding the Jews together as a group. Jewish cohesion requires an anti-assimilationist reason for being. Why do you think the constant harping on the Holocaust occurs? Why is there a “Holocaust” industry? Read any Jewish newspaper and at least once per week a “new” Holocaust story will appear, accompanied by a screed on “antisemitism”. If the Jews within Israel or their fellow travelers in the Diaspora really tried to end the fear, there would be nothing left.

      Reply to Comment
    2. Tomer

      Who wants to be part of the crazy Arab Middle East?

      Hezbolla (shiite fanatics) are fighting IS (sunni fanatics). Libya, Syria, Iraq, Yemen are in a state of Bloody Civil War. Egypt, Lebanon are in semi-civil war.

      Israel needs to AVOID joining these Middle East countries.

      Reply to Comment
      • Schwartz

        Good. Stop trying to “join” Palestine and Syria. Get out of the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem and the occupied Golan.

        Reply to Comment
      • Bryan

        If you don’t want to be part of the Middle East there is surely a simple solution – go back to New York, or Ottawa, or Melbourne, or Johannesburg, or Paris, or wherever you came from: its easier for people to move to different regions than it is for countries to move to different continents. Besides you’d be a lot safer, probably more prosperous, find that the cost of housing and chocolate puddings was cheaper, you wouldn’t have to serve in a conscript army or be ruled by religious nutters, and you could live with your conscience.

        Reply to Comment
    3. Bar

      Ah yes, I remember well how Israel was warmly embraced by the Middle East prior to 1967. My eyes are watering from the nostalgia.

      Reply to Comment
      • Mike Panzone

        …yes it’s hard to imagine what Israel did before ’67 to make her people so despised by so many around the world.

        Reply to Comment
    4. C. C. DeVille

      “Any real negotiation would entail a certain amount of respect and goodwill among the participants which Zionism essentially refutes; every deal must be a zero sum gain for the Zionists who will continue to seek ways to undermine whatever agreement is reached.”

      I’m not sure about that. See the Egyptian peace agreement for details

      Reply to Comment
    5. Mikesailor

      C.C.: If the US wasn’t bankrolling the Egyptian military regime, both Mubarak and al-Sissi, the ‘peace’ would have ended long ago. Actually, why do you think the Egyptians screw over the Palestinians at every opportunity? It’s called money. If the US pulled the money from Egypt because it is a military dictatorship; and Israel because it is a religious and racist ethnocracy; I wonder how long each of them would last? Each of them violate what the US claims it stands for. $3.5+ billion to the Israelis and $2.1 billion to the Egyptians. I would say, if you really want to test it, have both countries renounce all US aid, both overt and indirect (through the US tax system). Then we can see what kind of peace there will be between these two “good” friends. Or you really don’t believe it yourself?

      Reply to Comment
© 2010 - 2017 +972 Magazine
Follow Us
Credits

+972 is an independent, blog-based web magazine. It was launched in August 2010, resulting from a merger of a number of popular English-language blogs dealing with life and politics in Israel and Palestine.

Website powered by RSVP

Illustrations: Eran Mendel