+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

Israel media survey: Iran deal, not so bad after all?

A number of senior columnists and reporters say that Israel should be pleasantly surprised by the deal struck between the P5+1 and Iran over the latter’s nuclear program. Netanyahu — and his mouthpiece — digs in his heels.

EU High Representative Mogherini and Iranian Foreign Minister Zarif address reporters following negotiations, April 2, 2015. (State Dept. photo)

EU High Representative Mogherini and Iranian Foreign Minister Zarif address reporters following negotiations, April 2, 2015. (State Dept. photo)

Although the pushback from the Prime Minister’s Office was immediate and unchanged, many senior figures in the Israeli media appeared to be pleasantly surprised by the details of the Iranian nuclear deal Thursday night and Friday morning.

Ron Ben-Yishai, the senior military analyst for Israel’s most mainstream newspaper, Yedioth Aharonot, penned a column early Friday morning in which he said the deal was better than expected. Urging caution going forward, Ben-Yishai said that if the current framework reflects the final agreement, “even Israel could learn to live with it.”

“We could not have achieved a better outcome even if Israel, the United States, and other countries had carried out military strikes on the nuclear sites in Iran,” Ben-Yishai.

Haaretz diplomatic correspondent Barak Ravid wrote that Israel will have a hard time fighting the agreement, the comprehensiveness of which caught many in Jerusalem by surprise.

“In contrast to the messages conveyed in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech at Congress, the Israeli government’s public position over the last two years and the Pavlovian response that came out of Jerusalem on Thursday night, the framework agreement is not a bad deal at all,” Ravid wrote.

The newspaper’s Washington correspondent, Chemi Shalev, meanwhile, suggested that it might be worthwhile for Netanyahu to reassess his strategy of opposition to the deal.

Prime Minister Netanyahu and his mouthpiece, however, appeared to be digging in — at least initially, at least publicly.

Sheldon Adelson’s staunchly pro-Netanyahu newspaper, Israel Hayom, ran a top headline on Friday’s edition reading: “The Iran Deal — A Historic Mistake”.

Netanyahu’s bureau published a readout of his conversation with President Obama early Friday morning, led by a quote: “A deal based on this framework would threaten the survival of Israel.”

“Such a deal would not block Iran’s path to the bomb. It would pave it,” Netanyahu said.

Labor party leader Isaac Herzog and political partner Tzipi Livni put out a cautious but conciliatory message following the framework deal. Saying that Israel must now move on to the next stage of tackling the Iranian nuclear threat, the two said in a statement: “We must ensure that the final deal being put together at the moment reverses the Iranian nuclear program, prevents them from attaining a nuclear weapon, and protects Israel’s security interests.”

Joining the naysayers, Ma’ariv columnist Ben Caspit denounced the deal but suggested it could bring about a unity government with Netanyahu and Herzog.

Newsletter banner

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article

    * Required


    1. Jello

      Obama sold out America’s allies. Iran gets to keep its nuclear program and gets sanctions relief. Not a single facility is closing down. Iran keeps every centrifuge. Iran continues the military aspects of its program in Parchin. If only Obama wasn’t so desperate to surrender.

      Reply to Comment
      • Khaled

        Jello, Iran has the LEGAL undeniable right to a nuclear program. The measures taken by the IAEA to keep watch on Iran’s program is unprecedented. Iran has signed the non proliferation treaty and there no proof they are trying to build a bomb. Israel on the other hand, has nuclear weapons, is not a member of the IAEA nor has signed up to the non prolif. treaty.. Hypocrisy in action

        Reply to Comment
    2. Lo

      Likud is pissed they won’t get their war on for at least a few years. They care so much about this issue; they’re willing to fight to the last American.

      Reply to Comment
      • Jello

        Yes, that is why the Americans did everything possible to prevent an independent Israeli strike on Iran. Jackass.

        Reply to Comment
        • Lo

          A unilateral strike by Israel against Iran would do nothing to stop Iran’s nuclear program.

          However, it would require the Americans to get involved after Israel is hit by the inevitable Iranian retaliation. The US (and its partners) didn’t want the Israelis to strike because it is a catastrophically stupid idea.

          The only people advocating for it were Likud and its coterie of derranged allies in the US.

          Reply to Comment