Appreciate this article? +972 depends on your support.

Click here to help us keep going

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

Israel inching closer to a war nobody wants

Increasingly hawkish rhetoric directed at Hezbollah, along with providing humanitarian aid to Syrian rebels, may lead Israel into a war no one wants. Israel’s interest is a stable Middle East, but it won’t happen without an end to the occupation.

By Asher Kaufman

Illustrative photo of soldiers at the Israeli - Lebanese border (Hamad Almakt/Flash 90)

Illustrative photo of soldiers at the Israeli – Lebanese border (Hamad Almakt/Flash 90)

At the annual Herzliya Conference last week, the head of the Israeli Military Intelligence Directorate, Maj. Gen. Herzi Levi, told the crowd that “Iran, the Assad regime, and Hezbollah — these are the main threats in the region… and a major threat to the State of Israel.” Levi added that “one can clearly see Hezbollah building a military industry with Iranian knowledge, creating weaponry and transferring them to southern Lebanon.” At last year’s conference, Levi, along with military officials and politicians, made similar comments about the threat posed by the Iran-Assad-Hezbollah axis, adding that another round of fighting between Hezbollah and Israel is an inevitability.

Hassan Nasrallah does his part and threatens Israel morning and night, warning that during the next, inevitable war, all of Israel’s territory will be exposed to Hezbollah’s rockets, and that the organization may even manage to conquer parts of the north. In a speech delivered on “Quds Day,” Nasrallah added that thousands of Muslim volunteers from across the world will join the fight against Israel. It seems that both sides partake in a ritual of lobbing threats back and forth over the coming war, which will lead to the ultimate demise of the other side. Even though neither side have an immediate interest in going to war — Hezbollah is still neck-deep in the Syrian Civil War, and Israel is happy to maintain more than a decade of quiet in the north – wars rarely break out due to careful calculations on the part of one of the sides.

The cost of Israeli involvement in Syria

The latest spillover in the Golan Heights makes clear the danger on Israel’s northern border. Much of the border with Syria across the Golan Heights is still in the hands of the opposition, and in the last months the Assad regime and its allies have been diverting some of their military resources to take control of the area. Despite the fact that Israel officially repeats the mantra that it does not get involved in the Syrian Civil War, it is an open secret that it provides aid to some of the opposition groups near the Golan Heights. Recently, Fursan al-Julan, one of the heads of the opposition, was quoted saying that without Israeli aid, his organization would not have been able to survive the war.

It seems that in the wake of increased Israeli aid to Syrian groups in the area, the chances of heightened military conflagration between Israel and the Assad regime — and its allies — only grow. Although the Syrian army does not constitute a significant strategic threat to Israel, its alliance with Hezbollah and Iran may turn a momentary, local deterioration into a regional war that will realize the recurring threats between Israel and Hezbollah.

The Syrian Civil War and its regional repercussions raise many questions vis-a-vis Israel. What began as an internal Syrian struggle for control over the country long ago turned into a complex system of regional conflicts that cross borders, with global extensions in Europe, Africa, and beyond. Will Israel be able to prevent the war from spilling over into its territory? And if so, for how long? Will Israel be able to take specific steps to lessen the chances of violence on the northern border? How is the Syrian war related to, and how does it affect, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict?

A UN observer looks at a lookout point as smoke rising at a Syrian village near the Israeli-Syrian border in the Golan Heights during fights between the rebels and the Syrian army, June 25, 2017. (Basel Awidat/Flash90)

A UN observer looks at a lookout point as smoke rising at a Syrian village near the Israeli-Syrian border in the Golan Heights during fights between the rebels and the Syrian army, June 25, 2017. (Basel Awidat/Flash90)

The Israeli interest is, of course, to ensure the country stays out of the regional cycle of violence. Yet the aid Israel provides to Syrian organizations opens the way for increased Israeli intervention in the war. Although it does not seem that Hezbollah has an interest in currently opening a front against Israel, should Israel get directly involved, it would allow the organization to define its military struggle in Syria as part of its strategic resistance to Zionism. The civil war may be far from over, but it seems that the opposition is currently fighting its final battle. Hezbollah always deemed the war a struggle between the axis of resistance to the West and Zionism, and the reactionary forces that support Israel. Now, at this point in the war in Syria, it seems that more direct Israeli involvement will bolster Hezbollah’s attempt to paint the war in Syria as part of its resistance.

Israel’s double challenge

What should Israel do to lessen the possibility of a violent outburst in the north? First, lessening its hawkish rhetoric is a simple and necessary step. Limiting aid to Syrians on the border to humanitarian cases only may also decrease the potential for conflagration. This will require a wider regional strategy; herein lies not only the Syrian challenge, but also the challenge of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The current Israeli government, as well as many Israelis, will claim that there is no relationship between the two. The war in Syria is an inter-Arab or inter-Muslim issue, while the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is the internal issue between two nations related to the struggle over control over the country.

Protesters demonstrate in solidarity with Syrians, Tel Aviv, December 18, 2016. (Keren Manor/Activestills)

Protesters demonstrate in solidarity with Syrians, Tel Aviv, December 18, 2016. (Keren Manor/Activestills)

While this perception is not groundless, it ignores the wider picture of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and the fact that it goes unresolved only feeds regional tensions and conflicts, providing legitimacy to anti-Israeli tendencies. Imagine the power of Hezbollah should Palestinians and Israelis reach an agreement over sharing the land. Hezbollah needs the conflict to continue; the more it intensifies, the more legitimacy the organization has to continue its struggle against Israel.

Thus, Israel is faced with two security challenges that, at the end of the day, are interrelated. One is Hezbollah and Iran, which at its core is a military challenge that may lead to a kind of war that Israeli society has never yet deal with. The second one is the Palestinians, a challenge that is seen is Israel as security-based, yet cannot be compared to the military threat posed by Hezbollah and its Iranian patrons. The Palestinians — including Hamas in Gaza — do not have the military tools that could pose a strategic and existential challenge to Israel. In fact, Israel’s greatest enemy vis-a-vis the Palestinians is Israel itself. The continuation of the occupation and the gradual erosion of democratic rule are the primary enemy of Israeli society.

The Palestinians are part of the equation

The prevailing view in Israel, a continuing war in Syria will work in favor of Israel. Syria, which once was at the forefront of the struggle against Israel, has essentially dissolved and no longer poses a threat to the state. Returning the Golan Heights to Syria is no longer on the table and no longer interests the international community. As Syria, Yemen, and Libya crumble, and in the face of forming regional rivalries between Iran and Saudi Arabia, the status quo of Israel’s continued control of the Palestinian territories and the Golan Heights could continue indefinitely. This approach, however, is short-sighted inasmuch as it based on assumption that continued regional chaos serves Israeli interests.

Israeli interests, like international ones, must seek to bring an end to the fighting in Syria and stabilize the political situation in the Middle East. Unfortunately there are local, regional, and international forces interested in inflaming conflicts. The UN and the international community face immense pressure, which lessen the chances of constructive intervention to bring about the end of the fighting in Syria and the beginning of its rehabilitation. At the end of the day, Israel will be left with the same challenges, which although may seem unrelated, are entirely interconnected. It will be impossible to solve the challenge of the conflict with the Palestinians without also dealing with the Iran-Hezbollah axis in Syria and Lebanon. One is the conflict with the Palestinians. The other is the challenge of the Iran-Hezbollah axis in Syria and Lebanon. One will not be resolved without the other.

Professor Asher Kaufman is the head of the Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies. He focuses on Syria, Lebanon, and Israel. This post was originally published in Hebrew on Local Call.

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article
  • LEAVE A COMMENT

    * Required

    COMMENTS

    1. Firentis

      Israel’s interest is to keep Hezbollah and Iran away from the Golan Heights. Iran is the country that last week had its annual ‘destroy Israel’ demonstrations and Hezbollah is Iran’s loyal proxy in Lebanon. The idea that Israeli security will be best maintained by letting these two actors set up bases on the Northern border is ludicrous. The idea that a fundamentalist Islamist government in Iran will stop being hostile to Israel were it to make peace with one faction of the Palestinians is equally ludicrous. The idea that Hezbollah which lost thousands of fighters in Syria fighting enemies other than Israel requires the legitimization that comes with confronting Israel is, again, ludicrous. The idea that Israel can avoid the consequences of the Syrian war by meekly standing by is, say it with me, ludicrous.

      Reply to Comment
      • Jm

        Firentis
        Both logical and factually correct comments that don’t support the propagandist view of 972 are not welcome. Please refrain from such action in the future.

        Reply to Comment
      • The Golan Heights belongs to Syria. This is not in doubt anywhere on this planet except amongst Hasbara trolls. For proof, look no further than the UN Security Council president reminding Bibi of this fact last year. For further proof, see UNSCR 497.

        Reply to Comment
    2. Paranam Kid

      This article, while seemingly objective, is written in the spirit of “how can israel, a peace-loving country, survive when countries around it are either at war or threatening israel directly”. Existential threat – same old story. Moreover, certain facts are twisted into alternative facts to fit the israeli narrative.

      “The Israeli interest is, of course, to ensure the country stays out of the regional cycle of violence.”
      “The war in Syria is an inter-Arab or inter-Muslim issue, while the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is the internal issue between two nations related to the struggle over control over the country. While this worldview is not groundless, it ignores the wider picture of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and the fact that it goes unresolved only feeds regional tensions and conflicts, providing legitimacy to anti-Israeli tendencies. Imagine the power of Hezbollah should Palestinians and Israelis reach an agreement over sharing the land. Hezbollah needs the conflict to continue; the more it intensifies, the more legitimacy the organization has to continue its struggle against Israel.”
      “The Israeli-Palestinian conflict…”

      Israel is not staying out of it, and does not want to, it is meddling as much as the US, if not more. Hezbollah & Iran are depicted, as usual, as the villains intent on destroying israel, when only israel has done the destroying.

      As for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, it is NOT a conflict. the word “assumes that the parties involved have comparable access to resources (including material resources, freedom of movement, freedom to express oneself, as well as the forces of violence), but that they clash because their interests are mutually incompatible”. Rather, “one is dealing with an occupation, which consists in one party controlling, militarily or otherwise, the territory, time, liberty, and other resources deemed to be under the rightful control of the other party”. It is a 1-sided subjugation by a racist country of a defenseless people.

      To really get a good idea of what israel is up to, it is worth reading up on the Yinon plan, “A Strategy for Israel in the 1980s” – there is 1 page on Wikipedia. It was published in 1982, but it is amazing, scary really, how it has been taking shape. And while not all of the plan may come to fruition, a lot of it will be accomplished in the not too distant future.

      There is also a 2006 analysis by Linda Heard on Counterpunch here https://www.counterpunch.org/2006/04/25/is-the-us-waging-israel-s-wars/.

      Reply to Comment
      • Kirk Cage

        OF COURSE the issue is about the existential threat to Israel. That existential threat is older even than the State of Israel itself, dating back at least to the Arab Revolt of 1948, led by Haji Amin al-Husseini, who put a bounty on the head of every Jewish man, woman and child.
        The same dictators and terrorists groups that have been trying to destroy Israel over the past 80 years and the same dictators and terrorist groups that have made the lives of the non-Jewish peoples of the Middle East so miserable.

        Reply to Comment