+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

IDF spokesman endorses proposed anti-NGO legislation

Major Peter Lerner, spokesman for the IDF’s Central Command, appears to endorse proposed legislative bills that would, if approved by the Knesset, severely limit funding for Israeli human rights NGOs.

The proposed bills, which received approval from the Knesset Legislative Committee on Monday but have not yet passed a first reading in the Knesset, are, as my colleague Noam Sheizaf explains, highly controversial; in effect, they would amount to a severe limitation on freedom of speech, particularly since the targeted NGOs are critical of the army and the government’s policies. The bills were condemned by Kadima leader Tzipi Livni, head of the opposition, who called them “draconian and anti-Zionist,”  and by Labour leader Shelly Yachimovich. Hadash MK Dov Khenin accused the government of leading an “assault on [Israeli] democracy” (HEB link). The New York Times reports that Prime Minister Netanyahu supports limiting foreign funding for NGOs, but would like to narrow the wording of the bill; meanwhile, three prominent members of Netanyahu’s own Likud party opposed the bills in the ministerial committee vote.

Despite the controversy, IDF spokesman Peter Lerner tweeted two statements in which he appears to endorse this controversial proposed legislation.

In the first, he retweets another blogger’s link to an article headlined “Israel strikes a blow to foreign influence of its policies.”

The piece is published in Israel Today, a magazine founded by German Messianic Jews (also known as Jews for Jesus) who “believe that the existence of the State of Israel is a fulfillment of prophecy and a plumb line for the purposes of God for these times.”

In the second tweet, Major Lerner implies that Israeli human rights NGOs are engaged in subterfuge by failing to reveal the sources of their funding.

In fact, Israeli human rights NGOs routinely list all their sources of funding on their websites. By implying otherwise, Lerner is repeating a far-right canard – ie, that human rights NGOs are pawns of foreign influence and not really “Israeli.”

Since Major Lerner is tweeting in his official capacity as a spokesperson for the Israel Defense Forces, his statements would seem to reflect army policy. If that is the case, then the IDF, which receives at least $3 billion (USD) in foreign aid per annum, is proposing that human rights NGOs like B’tselem and the Association for Civil Rights in Israel be deprived of a few hundred thousand or couple million dollars in grant money for its operating costs. More seriously, he is violating IDF policy by expressing a political opinion in his capacity as a serving officer. Graver still is this: The proposed legislation has not even passed the first of three hearings in the Knesset yet; it is not law, but rather a political opinion. And yet, a serving IDF officer is openly supporting a partisan political position.

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article

    * Required


    1. aristeides

      Given that the primary activity of the IDF is violating human rights and engaging in war crimes, it makes total sense that they would oppose the organizations that have exposed their malfeasance.

      Reply to Comment
    2. RichardNYC

      What can be done?

      Reply to Comment

      Here are some exceprts from Caroline Glick’s column in Jerusalem Post. In them, she shares some of the information revealed in the latest wikileaks release.

      “B’Tselem director Jessica Montell explained what her group wished to achieve by colluding with the UN’s Goldstone Commission’s inquiry into Israel’s handling of Operation Cast Lead. According to the embassy report, Montell said, “Her aim…was to make Israel weigh world opinion and consider whether it could ‘afford another operation like this.’”

      “According to a leaked embassy cable report of the meeting, Radovanitz (former associate director of the New Israel Fund) said “she believed that in 100 years Israel would be majority Arab and that the disappearance of a Jewish state would not be the tragedy that Israelis fear since it would become more democratic.””

      “As for Montell, in a meeting with the US Embassy’s political officer in February 2010, she “estimated that [B’Tselem’s] 9 million NIS ($2.4 million) budget is 95 percent funded from abroad, mostly from European countries.””

      Reply to Comment
    4. Borg

      so why is this news? The US, UK, France, and Germany have laws preventing foreign governments funding political parties? Why should Israel be different

      Reply to Comment
    5. Louis

      Notice: that when hegemonic Israeli Orthodox Judaism wants to berate other forms of Judaism – Conservative, Reform – they always use the same rhetoric… ‘it’s not Israeli’ or ‘its not authentic’ etc., and thus dissenting voices, movements, activists are disenfranchised and are coercively disengaged from the acceptable bounds of hegemonic Israel.

      Reply to Comment
    6. Bronxman

      “…..far-right canard – ie, that human rights NGOs are pawns of foreign influence and not really “Israeli.”

      Any sort of opposition to the regional governments in power – Syria, Lebanon, Iran, Saudi Arabia, for example – is always blamed on foreign influence. No imagination. I get the feeling that most governments consider 100% of their citizens to be totaly naive and believing.

      Reply to Comment
    7. […] לפני כשלושה שבועות כתבתי כאן על ההערות הפוליטיות שהרשה לעצמו רס"ן פטר לרנר, דובר פיקוד מרכז, בחשבון הטוויטר שלו. בין השאר, לרנר כתב על חוק העמותות – שהוא כזכור עדיין הצעת חוק – ש"לדעתי צריכה להיות חשיפה מלאה מצד הארגונים, כדי שאנשים ידעו," כלומר אימץ בפועל את העמדה של "אם תרצו." את הציוץ המקורי של לרנר אפשר לראות כאן. […]

      Reply to Comment