+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

The audacity of unchecked power in Khan al-Ahmar

An entire Palestinian village is facing destruction. What follows will dictate the fate of Palestinian communities all over the West Bank. 

By Hagai El-Ad

File photo of Israeli Defense Minister Avigdor Liberman speaking at the Jerusalem Post Conference in New York, April 29, 2018. (Marc Israel Sellem/POOL/Flash90)

File photo of Israeli Defense Minister Avigdor Liberman speaking at the Jerusalem Post Conference in New York, April 29, 2018. (Marc Israel Sellem/POOL/Flash90)

Defense Minister Avigdor Liberman’s recent op-ed in the Jerusalem Post – designed to whitewash the war crime of the destruction of an entire Palestinian community in the occupied West Bank – is riddled with lies and distortions.

The very premise he posits in his opening sentence is untrue. Liberman writes of “a judicial ruling for the relocation of a small group of squatters from Khan al-Ahmar.” The High Court of Justice’s ruling, however, actually addressed demolition orders, not “relocation.” Moreover, the state assured the court that it is not seeking to forcibly transfer the nearly 200 residents – not squatters – who call Khan al-Ahmar home. By misrepresenting the court’s recent decision, Liberman reveals the true intentions of his government.

Furthermore, contrary to Liberman’s hollow claims, this is a question neither of “the rule of law” nor of “the well-being of these people themselves.” The rule of law, in any meaningful sense, has been absent from Palestinians’ lives in the occupied territories ever since 1967. Israel clings to the letter of the law and creates legal-sounding justifications for its organized state violence. In most of the occupied West Bank, building “legally,” i.e., with a permit, is reserved for settlers — an option Israel denies Palestinians.

As for the “well-being of these people,” Liberman’s arrogance in deciding for them what is best for them epitomizes the occupation and the overarching principle of ruling over another people, deprived of political rights: Israel makes all the decisions. To that end, it has established a completely one-sided planning regime with absolutely no Palestinian representation. This guarantees, in fact, the well-being of a growing settler population at the expense of Palestinians, while cynically claiming to address the best interests of the people whose homes it is about to raze to the ground.



To top it off, Liberman feigns indignation over other countries daring to question Israel’s “internal judicial processes,” ignoring the fact that there is nothing “internal” in what happens to protected people living under prolonged military rule in areas outside Israel’s recognized borders. And there is nothing “judicial” in yet another ruling by Israel’s High Court of Injustice that serves the occupation, in which Israeli justices represent Israeli interests and pave the way for the flagrantly immoral and illegal implementation of Israel’s broad intentions to minimize Palestinian presence throughout Area C, displace local communities, and expand settlements.

In the face of these lies, here are some hard truths.

Liberman’s op-ed follows a recent letter he sent to EU ambassadors regarding Khan al-Ahmar, in which the defense minister accused the Europeans of “a flagrant interference in Israel’s sovereign affairs.”

Israeli forces raid the village of Khan al Ahmar in the early hours of the morning, and demolish several structures that were built by Palestinian activists, in protest of the imminent risk of demolition over the entire village, Khan al-Ahmar, outside Jerusalem, September 13, 2018. (Oren Ziv/Activestills.org)

Israeli forces seen during a raid the village of Khan al Ahmar, outside Jerusalem, September 13, 2018. (Oren Ziv/Activestills.org)

Yet in reality, Europe should do much more. Certainly, it must if it is to effectively back its own policies, protect human rights and stop Israel’s ongoing, systematic, impunity-driven violations.

“[R]espect for human rights and democratic principles” is – supposedly – at the heart of Israel’s close relationship with its largest trade partner, the European Union. Although this is the basis for the EU-Israel Association Agreement, Israel is allowed to undermine these very foundations without suffering any consequences.

The opposite of the rule of law is unchecked power. To quote a recent tweet from Prime Minister Netanyahu’s Twitter account: “The weak crumble, are slaughtered and are erased from history.” Have we come to this? Are we really at the point where the only thing that matters is naked power?

Israeli policemen scuffle with Palestinian demonstrators in the Bedouin village of Khan al-Ahmar, east of Jerusalem, on July 4, 2018. (Flash90)

Israeli policemen scuffle with Palestinian demonstrators in the Bedouin village of Khan al-Ahmar, July 4, 2018. (Flash90)

The international order is under attack these days on multiple fronts. Khan al-Ahmar is an example of one place we must stand strong and insist on the core principles of international law and basic human decency. Palestinian communities must not be abandoned and left to crumble.

An entire Palestinian village is facing destruction. The threat is real and imminent. What follows will dictate the fate of Palestinian communities all over the West Bank. Now is the time for action. If not now, when?

The author is the executive director of B’Tselem, the Israeli Information Center for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories.

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article

    * Required


    1. Bruce Gould

      “U.S. Jewish leaders to Netanyahu: Khan al-Ahmar must not be demolished”


      Jewish community and religious leaders in the US submitted a letter to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu this week to stop the demolition of the Beduin village of Khan al-Ahmar in the West Bank.

      “The demolition – should it take place – will violate the principles of human rights and humanitarian law, to which Israel, as a democratic state, has ascribed,” the letter said.

      Reply to Comment
    2. Ben

      Clearly exposing the fraudulence, arrogance and cynicism of Liberman, Hagai El-Ad captures the whole dishonest basis of the occupation. And from a deeply knowledgeable, authentic, inside perspective.

      It is classic truth telling, illuminating articles like this that make +972 Magazine great. Please donate to +972 Magazine today. You can make a single donation or set up a monthly contribution here:

      Reply to Comment
    3. Lewis from Afula

      I agree with Ben and Bruce.
      These illegal Jordanian trespassers and detrimental squatters need to be shown the door.
      Their relatives some 20 km away in Amman are waiting for them to return home!

      Reply to Comment
      • Ben

        I agree with Hagai El-Ad.

        Hagai El-Ad nicely exposes Liberman’s pretensions about “the rule of law” and “the well-being of these people themselves” (because you know Liberman cares, LoL) but Lewis is Liberman stripped of his pretensions. Behold the naked right wing Israeli. Not a pretty sight.

        Reply to Comment
        • Lewis from Afulal

          Right-wing Israelis represent about 75% of the state’s population.
          They consist of some 90& of the population under 30 years of age.
          You need to face the truth.

          Reply to Comment
          • Ben

            What part of “Behold the naked right wing Israeli. Not a pretty sight“ did you not understand? I’m definitely facing the truth.

            Reply to Comment
          • john

            this is lewis’ cue for ido geller to deny that extremists represent the zionist base in israel today.

            Reply to Comment
          • Ben

            Good point!

            Reply to Comment
      • Yeah, Right

        Geneva Convention IV clearly states that Protected Persons (i.e. the occupied) can not be forcibly transferred except “if the security of the population or imperative military reasons so demand”.

        Which, obviously, is not the case here.

        And even if the occupying power (i.e. the IDF) made the ludicrous claim that there is an “imperative military reason” behind this then GCIV also says “Persons thus evacuated shall be transferred back to their homes as soon as hostilities in the area in question have ceased.”

        Clearly the transfer can not be made permanent, which is what Israel is proposing.

        This is clearly a war crime.

        Reply to Comment
        • Lewis from Afula

          Jews were living in Judea and Samaria LONG BEFORE the Geneva Convention was written. Indeed, Jerusalem’s Jewish Temple existed when Geneva was peopled by illiterate cave dwelling-cannibals. Hence, the convention cannot be applied retrospectively against Judea’s indigenous inhabitants.

          Reply to Comment