+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

In Israel's 'eternal capital,' anti-Palestinian discrimination is built-in

A closer look at Jerusalem’s new construction plans are a testament to the fact that Israel cannot continue lording over hundreds of thousands of Palestinians without infringing on their basic rights.

By Aviv Tatarsky

Israeli military bullldozers demolish a Palestinian four-story building in the East Jerusalem neighborhood of Issawiya. July 11, 2017. (Afif H. Amireh/Flash90)

Israeli military bullldozers demolish a Palestinian four-story building in the East Jerusalem neighborhood of Issawiya. July 11, 2017. (Afif H. Amireh/Flash90)

After a considerably long lull, Prime Minister Netanyahu and Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat have rebooted their plan to build beyond the Green Line in the city. These days, the government is working to build 2,000 housing units in East Jerusalem — and that’s only the beginning. Israeli building in the territories occupied in 1967 is usually tied to Israel’s attempt to thwart all attempts to make East Jerusalem the future capital of the Palestinian state, and thus perpetuate the bloodletting.

But Israeli construction has another angle that we tend to ignore: almost every single plan that was proposed over the past week directly violates the basic rights of Palestinians to live here. Not over “there” in the West Bank, where settlers (not us, that is) are willing to live alongside people without rights; but right here in the democratic state of Israel, and in proximity to the Israeli mainstream. The long list of construction plans proposed last week is yet another reminder of what Palestinian life looks like in our capital. Here are just four examples of basic Palestinian rights that will be violated as a result of these plans.

Equality. Nir Barkat joined the Right’s celebration over the lifting of restrictions on settlement construction, announcing last week plans to build 800 apartments in Israeli neighborhoods beyond the Green Line. “Construction will continue unabated in order to strengthen the capital of Israel.” Barkat also announced that the construction of 114 housing units in the city’s Palestinian neighborhoods “as part of the city’s policy to build in all parts of the city.”

Jeruslaem Mayor Nir Barkat attends a Finance Committee meeting in the Knesset, May 29, 2017. (Yonatan Sindel/Flash90)

Jeruslaem Mayor Nir Barkat attends a Finance Committee meeting in the Knesset, May 29, 2017. (Yonatan Sindel/Flash90)

These are the mayor’s numbers, which according to him are a testament to the equality and fairness with which he runs the city. However, a quick calculation shows that while Palestinians make up 38 percent of the city’s residents, those 114 housing units constitute only 12 percent of the 914 units Barkat is so proud of. Real equality would mean that alongside those 800 “Israeli” apartments, the municipality would plan to build 490 units in Palestinian neighborhoods — more than four times what it has committed itself to. In eight years of Barkat and Netanyahu’s rule, the Jerusalem municipality has approved numerous, detailed master plans for the expansion of Israeli neighborhoods to the tune of 10,000 additional housing units. Meanwhile, not a single master plan has expanded the areas designated for living in Palestinian neighborhoods.

Housing. As part of Barkat’s new plans, there are two plans being promoted by settler organizations, in which existing homes in the East Jerusalem neighborhood of Sheikh Jarrah will be demolished and replaced by larger buildings. Palestinians have been living in the existing homes since before 1967. Ownership over the land was transferred to settler organizations as part of a law that allows settlers to reclaim property that was previously owned by Jews until 1948 and was lost in the war, yet prevents Palestinians in East Jerusalem to do the same over assets they lost in West Jerusalem during that same war.

The Palestinians living in those Sheikh Jarrah homes have protected status that prevents their eviction. However, the settlers are allowed to evict protected residents if they can show that it is necessary in order to enhance the asset. Thus, under the guise of promoting building, the state takes part in the expulsion of more Palestinian families from their homes.

Palestinian residents confront Jewish settlers who have seized Palestinian homes in the East Jerusalem neighborhood of Sheikh Jarrah, September 2, 2011. (Ryan Rodrick Beiler/Activestills.org)

Palestinian residents confront Jewish settlers who have seized Palestinian homes in the East Jerusalem neighborhood of Sheikh Jarrah, September 2, 2011. (Ryan Rodrick Beiler/Activestills.org)

Education. The municipality is also promoting a plan to build a seven-story in Sheikh Jarrah that will serve as an ultra-Orthodox yeshiva, of all things. This, despite the fact that according to the neighborhood’s master plan — which was designed by Israel — the land is marked as “public buildings for the welfare of the local community.” Sheikh Jarrah has not even a single public elementary school. And yet the Israel Land Administration has allocated the area to an ultra-Orthodox organization; suffice it to say that the Jerusalem municipality does not oppose this plan.

Property rights. Last week, Jerusalem Municipality promoted a plan to expand Ramat Shlomo, a large Jewish housing development in northern East Jerusalem, by 500 housing units. Israeli developers who claim to own the property are behind the plan, yet a close look at land registry documents teach us that the land is not owned by the developers. In fact, large swaths of that land are marked to warn that ownership is legally disputed, and that other parts are owned by Palestinians. None of this hindered the city from joining forces with the developers, who submitted the plan to the Jerusalem District Planning and Building Committee, deciding that the plan was worth backing.

A construction site next to Ramat Shlomo, Jerusalem, November 21. 2016. (Sebi Berens/Flash90)

A construction site next to Ramat Shlomo, Jerusalem, November 21. 2016. (Sebi Berens/Flash90)

Sounds like Amona? In Jerusalem there is no need for the “Regularization Bill” to take over Palestinian land. More than that, part of Ramat Shlomo — which is undisputedly Palestinian owned — is designated as a park. That is, the Israeli developers will make money off of the sale of 500 housing units on land they claim to own, while the Palestinian landowners will “donate” their land to a park without seeing a shekel.

This is the Jerusalem the Israeli government is so determined to control exclusively. Disregard for Palestinian rights in the city is not a mistake, nor is it the result of evil. An Israel that wants all of Jerusalem to itself cannot lord over hundreds of thousands of Palestinians without harming their basic rights. When we refuse to see Palestinians as our partners in this city, we give up on the possibility of a life of welfare and peace, as well as the basic rules of fairness and democracy.

Aviv Tatarsky is a researcher for Ir Amim, an Israeli NGO that works for an equitable Jerusalem. This post was originally published in Hebrew on Local Call.

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article

    * Required


    1. Growl

      “Disregard for Palestinian rights in the city is not a mistake, nor is it the result of evil.”

      I disagree. It is the result of evil. Racism, denial of rights, and theft are evil. Not uncommon, but still evil.

      Reply to Comment
    2. Lewis from Afula

      Reptriate the illegal Jordanian squatters. They started the 6 day war. Now, it is our turn to finish it by sending them home.

      Reply to Comment
      • Bruce Gould

        @Lewis: It’s a wee bit more complicated than that:


        But if it’s slogans and collective punishment you want, why not “export the fake Ashkenazic Jews back to Russia”?

        Down here in actual reality, the 6+ milllion Jews and 6+ million Palestinians will live in close proximity to each other…forever.

        Reply to Comment
        • Lewis from Afula

          Who says?
          Transfer of the Jordanians is the only sane solution.
          Its the only solution we have not yet tried.

          Reply to Comment
          • Ben

            The knuckle dragger from Afula represents the intellectual and moral level of the Israeli far right. Behold. Lewis is recommending war crimes and crimes against humanity. But you know, I think we’re past this kind of mindless Judeofascism here. It’s not interesting or informative. It contributes absolutely nothing except to show what low cultural level we are dealing with when we deal with the Israeli right wing these days.

            Reply to Comment
          • Itshak Gordin Halevy

            The right wing is simply not suicidal..

            Reply to Comment
          • Ben

            Well, Halevy, your concept of “suicide” is the relinquishing of your status as Jewish Overlord and Subjugator of Non-Jewish Persons of the Realm, a status that you think “God” bequeathed you as a divine right as hereditary chosen among chosen. I gotta tell you, Halevy, I’m not impressed with your existential angst. When democracy comes your hysterical fainting spells will subside gradually and you’ll get over it. You could take a coping skills class. You poor dear.

            Reply to Comment
          • Lewis from Afula


            My solution is to end the Apartheid, end the Subjugation, end the Oppression, stop ruling over others.
            By implementing the same solution that the Soviet Army did in Koningsberg in 1944-1945.

            Reply to Comment
          • Ben

            There are psychopaths and people at a very low cultural level in every society, Lewis. It doesn’t make you special. That you are loudly signaling that you are one of them and that you are trolling me about opportunistic fantasies with regard to mass rape, looting, murder and ethnic cleansing is of no consequence except to show what it looks like under that rock you crawl out from. By the way the word is Konigsberg. And that you keep misspelling it shows it is not simply a typo and that you exist at a very low educational and cultural level, in a morass of ignorance and moral turpitude. Really, the emanations of your mind do not interest me except as a clinical specimen.

            Reply to Comment
          • carmen

            Actually, the right is. They just choose to drag it out and to continue to steal, murder, rape, torture and provoke the palestinians to give the devil his due. Awesome job Itshat.

            Reply to Comment
    3. Paranam Kid

      This article shows the new depth the israeli depravation is sinking to every day. But there is something even more fundamental:

      1. the author says “….but right here in the democratic state of Israel”.
      israel is NOT a democracy because it is an ethnocracry, and by definition an ethnocracy cannot be a democracy
      2. israel is does not have the right to be in East Jerusalem, is is considerd Palestinian land, which israel has stolen. So even calculations of what would be equitable proportions of Jewish and Arab housing units are meaningless because israel is in breach of international law, which it has been since its fraudulent creation.

      israel knows all this damn well, which is why it is always suppressing criticism & whining about delegitimisation of israel. israel in its current form has NO legitimacy, and it knows it.

      Reply to Comment
      • Paranam Kid

        Not “depravation” but “depravity”. Apologies.

        Reply to Comment
    4. Mark

      We do things quite differently in my country. We provide housing for poor people in tower blocks and then, at great public expense, upgrade to make them more visually appealing with cladding that is not only inflammable but releases toxic fumes. Those who escaped the building with nothing but their night clothes are denied access to donations from the community, or do not claim them for fear that they might be deported.

      Throughout the middle east “unwanted” people, aka refugees, are housed in camps with the full intention of NEVER integrating them into the local community, or left to their own devices.

      I don’t know US too well, but seems they house poor folks in substandard housing and provide substandard health care and education.

      Before castigating IL, I think we should all be wary of pot calling the kettle black.

      Reply to Comment
      • Ben

        @Mark: A string of bogus analogies. Nothing more.

        Reply to Comment