+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

IDF: Nothing illegal in Gaza strike that killed three journalists

The chief military prosecutor investigates the IDF’s killing of three journalists and finds that ‘the [mortar] fire was carried out in accordance with Israeli and international law,’ in response to intensive fire toward IDF troops.

By Oren Persico

A destroyed quarter in Shujaiyeh neighborhood in the east of Gaza City, during a ceasefire, July 27, 2014. (Photo by Anne Paq/Activestills.org)

A destroyed quarter in Shejaiya neighborhood in the east of Gaza City, during a ceasefire, July 27, 2014. (Photo by Anne Paq/Activestills.org)

IDF Military Advocate General Danny Efroni decided not to open a criminal investigation into the killing of three journalists, among others, during Operation Protective Edge last summer, according the IDF prosecutor.

On July 30, 2014, IDF forces shelled the market area of the Shejaiya neighborhood in Gaza. Rami Rayan, 26, who reportedly worked as a cameraman for Gaza-based news agency PNJM, was killed on the spot in the shelling. Muhammad al-Diri, 26, who also worked as a cameraman for the same news agency, was wounded and died a few days later. Same al-Ariyan, 28, who worked as a presenter on Hamas’s television station Al-Aqsa, was also wounded in the shelling and died hours later.

Since the end of “Protective Edge,” the IDF General Staff, led by Gen. Noam Tivon, has been reviewing various incidents in which it is suspected that IDF soldiers broke the law. Roughly six months ago, the IDF Prosecutor announced [Hebrew] that the General Staff had examined a different incident, in which Gaza journalist Hamed Shaheb was killed, and reached the conclusion that there was no evidence Shaheb indeed worked as a journalist. It added that his vehicle was bombed because it was transporting weaponry.

At the same time, the Meir Amit Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center (ITIC) identified the journalists who were killed during the operation and reached the conclusion that some of them were terror operatives [Hebrew]. However, also according to the ITIC, the three journalists killed by IDF shelling on July 30 in the market area of Shejaiya were working as journalists at the time they were hit. Additionally, despite the fact that one of them was employed by a Hamas media organization, there was no evidence found that the three were involved in terrorism.

Gazans flee Shejaiya after Israeli tanks invaded the area, bombarding it heavily, July 20, 2014. (Anne Paq/Activestills.org)

The IDF Prosecutor this week published the findings of the General Staff review of the events of July 30. The findings show that the three journalists were not killed while documenting civilians shopping in the market, as was reported in the Palestinian media. Instead, the review found, they were bombed as they arrived to film the bombing of a family home adjacent to the market. According to the IDF’s General Staff review, the strike on that home led to the deaths of seven people and a crowd civilians and journalists subsequently gathered around the house. Then the house was hit again and a number of those gathered were also killed.

According to the IDF Prosecutor’s announcement, the attack took place as the IDF was responding to mortar fire it identified as targeting its troops, and which wounded one soldier. In order to prevent harm to civilians the IDF held its fire for around an hour, during which the mortar fire continued. When the IDF ultimately returned fire, according to the Israeli military review, it was very restrained because it feared high “collateral damage.” IDF forces fired five mortar shells toward one of the identified sources of fire, and roughly 18 minutes later, when the mortar fire didn’t stop, it fired another 10 rounds at the same area.

“The [IDF] forces assumed at the time of the incident that the probability they would hit civilians was low,” the IDF Prosecutor’s announcement said:

Before the start of the ground incursion in [Shejaiya], a widespread warning to evacuate had been provided, which, according to the information in the force’s possession, had resulted in the evacuation of the vast majority of the civilian population in the neighborhood. An additional warning to evacuate was made two days prior to the incident, on 28 July, in order to keep the civilian population at a distance from the area of hostilities. Moreover, during the ongoing aerial surveillance carried out in the area in the period leading up to the incident, no civilian presence was identified on the roads and in the open areas of the neighborhood – which are the areas in which the danger posed by mortar shells is generally greater than the danger to those inside a building. In real time, no aerial surveillance capabilities were available to the forces. Thus, even if the possibility of civilian presence in the area had not been entirely ruled out, in consideration of the assessment that most of the population had evacuated and that no civilian presence was identified in the area prior to the incident, the understanding was that the risk of harm as a result of the limited fire was low.

After the event, by comparing the actions taken by IDF forces with the allegations contained in the complaint received by the MAG Corps, it can be concluded that one of the shells from the first round of fire carried out by IDF forces apparently struck the roof of the Al-Salak family, at a time when the family was on the roof, and killed seven family members; and that two shells from the second round of fire carried out by IDF forces apparently struck the crowd which had gathered next to the Al-Salak house in the wake of the first strike. At the same time, the possibility that the harm to civilians during this incident resulted from a misfire by a Palestinian terror organization has not been ruled out, in light of the extensive enemy mortar fire emanating from the area at the time.

The chief IDF Prosecutor, as communicated in the announcement, reached the conclusion that, “the [mortar] fire was carried out in a manner that accorded with Israeli domestic law and international law requirements,” because, “the fire was aimed towards mortars and their operators, with the aim of neutralizing their capacity to continue carrying out ongoing and intensive fire on IDF forces, who found themselves in a situation of clear and present mortal danger.”

Later in the announcement it says that:

The MAG found, that in the incident in question, there occurred a number of coincidences and series of events that a military commander should not be expected to predict – the shell that resulted in the first instance of extensive harm to civilians (members of the Al-Salak family) landed on a roof, at a time where there was a group of people on the roof (while the chance that the shell would penetrate the building and cause similar harm to persons inside, was lower); and the second instance of extensive harm was caused to a group who had gathered outside the house of the Al-Salak family, in the wake of the previous strike. At the time when the decision was made to carry out the second round of fire, IDF forces were not aware of the hit on the Al-Salak house as a result of the first round of fire, nor of the crowd which had gathered outside the Al-Salak house.

In light of the above, the MAG found that the commander’s assessment that the collateral damage expected from the strike would not be excessive in relation to the military advantage anticipated from it, was not unreasonable under the circumstances, in light of the information that was at his disposal at that time. As such the MAG found that there had been no misconduct on the part of IDF forces in regards to the incident in question, and that even though the ultimate outcome of the action was tragic, it does not affect the legality of the fire post facto.

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article

    * Required


    1. Weiss

      Visions of the Warsaw a Ghetto…

      Version 2.0

      Reply to Comment
    2. Pedro X

      Visions of Paradise or how to get a Darwin Award

      Hamas, Islamic Jihad and Fatah leaders often claim that Palestinians love death more than life and therefore use their civilians as human shields in their military and terrorist operations against Israel. However some Palestinians by acts of incredible stupidity justly qualify for a Darwin Award. On July 30, 2014 Palestinians in Shuja’iyya neighborhood qualified for a group award.

      In Shuja’iyya, a widespread warning to evacuate had been provided, which, according to the information in the IDF force’s possession, had resulted in the evacuation of the vast majority of the civilian population in the neighborhood. On July 28, 2014 Israel renewed their warning. On the same date during battles in the Shati camp, Hamas rockets misfired and killed 13 Palestinian civilians including 11 children. Still, some Palestinians decided not to evacuate but to remain in the middle of an urban battlefield established and being actively used by Hamas and Islamic Jihad.

      Maybe some Palestinians were afraid to leave. However some Palestinians instead of taking precautions not to be caught up in the fighting, did their best to qualify for a Darwin award by incredible acts of stupidity during active war operations going on around them. One family of seven gathered on the roof of their building during intense shelling of Israeli positions by Hamas emanating from their very neighborhood. Instead of hunkering down in the basement of their building they congregated on the roof tops observing and cheering the Hamas fireworks. Did they think that Israel would not defend itself by returning lethal fire or were they just too busy cheering on the Hamas troops?

      Now if this was not bad enough, hundreds of other Palestinians tried to get in on the Darwin award surely to be awarded to the Palestinian family on the roof. As Hamas continued to bombard the Israeli position from the Shuja’iyya neighborhood, Palestinians congregated in the theater of war where the Palestinian family home was hit and from which Hamas was firing. Any one with a modicum of common sense would have reasoned because Hamas fired mortars at Israeli soldiers who responded with mortars back at terrorist positions, that additional Hamas shelling would be met with additional Israeli mortaring of the Hamas position. Indeed this is what happened. Israel fired 10 more mortars at the terrorists firing on the Israeli forces. The Israeli mortars took out the Hamas squad shooting mortars and killed six of their members. Other Palestinians who had congregated in the theater of war were also killed and up to two hundred injured. Apparently three Palestinian journalists were killed during the mortar fire. They exhibited no more common sense than their fellow Gazans.

      Meanwhile in Israel, because Israelis love life more than death, Israeli civilians including journalists actively sought cover as Gazans fired thousands of rockets and mortars against Israeli civilian centers. Israel built bomb shelters, protective rooms in their houses and fortified school roofs in an effort to avoid injury and death as a result of Hamas’ and Islamic Jihad’s rocketing of Israeli urban centers.

      Reply to Comment
      • Mike Remes

        offensive…racist…mendacious. change the record. at least the idf went to the issue of concocting this fantastical account to cover the market place shelling massacre.

        Reply to Comment