+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

Hundreds of Israelis urge the UN to release ‘settlement blacklist’

The petition, by a group of prominent Israelis, is a cry for help to the international community, asking it to insist on seeing the Green Line no matter how hard the Netanyahu government works to erase it.

Construction workers begin work on the new settlement called Amichai, meant to resettle the evacuees of Amona, in Shilo Valley, West Bank, on June 20, 2017. (Yonatan Sindel/Flash90)

Construction workers begin work on the new settlement called Amichai, meant to resettle the evacuees of Amona, in Shilo Valley, West Bank, on June 20, 2017. (Yonatan Sindel/Flash90)

Over 400 Israelis, including a former attorney general, retired diplomats, ex-members of Knesset, and prominent intellectuals, sent a petition to the UN urging it to release a list of companies that do business in or with Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank.

Israel is reportedly doing “everything [it] can to ensure that this list does not see the light of day.” The UN Human Rights Council began compiling the list of companies last year and it was due to be published in March 2017, although political pressure at the time resulted in the publication date being delayed until December.

The database, or list of companies, has been referred to as a blacklist, and was one of the primary motivators behind the anti-BDS legislation currently making its way through the U.S. Congress.

The petition, authored by the Policy Working Group, points to the UN Security Council Resolution 2332, which called on the international community “to distinguish in their relevant dealings, between the territory of the State of Israel and the territories occupied since 1967.”

“As loyal citizens of Israel,” the petition begins, “[we] believe that the international community has a crucial and urgent role to play in order to redress the Israel/Palestine fast deteriorating conflict. We believe that to serve that end, it is essential that the international community will act against the settlement policy of the Government of Israel, which bars any resolution of this conflict.”

Crowdfunding campaign banner

“We strongly support the decision of the Human Rights Council to publish a list of companies carrying out business with the settlements,” continues the letter to UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Zeid bin Ra’ad al Hussein, which was also sent to the UN secretary general. “We hope that the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights will not relent in the face of any pressure to avoid the publication of such lists.”

All settlements are illegal under international law, a position that was reiterated by the UN Security Council in its resolution on the matter in late 2016.

Among the signatories are former attorney general Michael Ben-Yair, former director-general of the Israeli Foreign Ministry Alon Liel, former Israeli ambassador to South Africa Ilan Baruch, former IDF chief education officer Mordechai Bar-On, at least eight recipients of the Israel Prize, and hundreds of other prominent Israelis.

The rationale behind pursuing an international policy of calling out companies that are engaged in business with Israeli settlements, explained Policy Working Group chairman Ambassador Ilan, is that “such business relations enhance the environment which sustains human rights violations and stand in contrast with the interest of peace in the Middle East.”

Whether it is possible to differentiate between Israel and its settlements is itself a matter of debate, however. Israeli officials are deliberately chipping away at the very idea that one can boycott or divest from Israeli settlements without harming Israel and its economy.

“If you want to divest from the West Bank – Judea and Samaria – you have to divest from Israel, which means you boycott Israel completely,” Israeli diplomat Ron Brummer said last month, according to a report in Mondoweiss. Strategic Affairs and Public Security Minister Gilad Erdan told the AP last month that a settlement boycott equals a boycott of Israel.

Israel has good reason to fear a settlement boycott. As I wrote a year ago:

[N]ot only is the settlement economy virtually inseparable from the Israeli economy, the occupation is part of the Israeli economy. Blurring whatever remains — or once existed — of the line distinguishing the two has been one of the Netanyahu government’s greatest projects.

The truth is that Israel’s settlements are not only an inextricable part of the Israeli economy, they have become an inextricable part of Israel, at least as far as the current leadership sees things. Israeli leaders see the idea of a limited boycott of the settlements alone as a farce because they know it would bleed right through the Green Line they’ve been working so hard to erase.

The Israeli government’s “you’re either with us or against us” approach to countering the boycott movement, or any accountability for the occupation for that matter, is becoming starker at an almost dizzying pace. One new law denies entry into Israel to foreign nationals who support the Palestinian-led boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) movement. Just in the past few days, the head of Netanyahu’s governing coalition introduced legislation that would make supporting BDS a crime punishable by seven years in prison. The list goes on.

Nearly all of the anti-BDS legislation introduced in Israel in recent years — as well as legislation introduced by its proxies and friends in other countries — deliberately erases any distinction between those who might boycott all of Israel and those who limit their boycotts to Israeli settlements.

The aim of erasing that differentiation is to delegitimize the worldview that believes Israel can (or even should) end the occupation of Palestine, without which the settlements cannot exist. The Israeli Right wants to create a binary, zero-sum equation in which one cannot support Israel while opposing its settlements, and by extension the occupation, even if that means losing a significant number of its supporters along the way.

In their petition to the United Nations, these 430 Israelis are demanding that the world not fall into the Israeli Right’s trap. They are asking the international community to insist on seeing the Green Line, no matter how hard Israel works to erase it.

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article
  • LEAVE A COMMENT

    * Required

    COMMENTS

    1. Vinnie

      Nice…if those companies are revealed it would be a great portfolio for investment purposes..! There are muslime only cities and predominately islamic countries, we need the same for the Jewish and Buddhist religions. If it’s good for muslimes in saudi arabia it will be ok for the Jews, Hindus and Buddhist

      Reply to Comment
    2. Lewis from Afula

      I totally agree with Vinny !!!

      Reply to Comment
    3. Ben

      And ‘Vinnie’ is not simply dismissable as a barely coherent anti-Arab-Semite, because calling Jews ‘Jewslimes’ would of course not be anti-Jewish-Semitic, either, right?

      Reply to Comment