Appreciate this article? +972 depends on your support.

Click here to help us keep going

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

How Israel is turning one Arab party into a security threat

Balad isn’t the first political party in Israel to be suspected of violating campaign finance laws. But it is the first one to have its members arrested in overnight, commando-style raids.

Joint Arab List members Jamal Zahalka (L), Haneen Zoabi (R) and Basel Ghattas at the weekly Joint List meeting in the Knesset, February 8, 2016. (Yonatan Sindel/Flash90)

Joint Arab List members Jamal Zahalka (L), Haneen Zoabi (R) and Basel Ghattas at the weekly Joint List meeting in the Knesset, February 8, 2016. (Yonatan Sindel/Flash90)

There are two possible ways to describe the dramatic, highly-publicized arrest of dozens of activists and senior members of the Balad party earlier this week:

“The police opened a wide spreads investigation against Balad over suspicions of fraudulently transferring millions of shekels to the party’s coffers during the 2013 elections.”

Or: “In an overnight operation security focus raided the homes of dozens of Palestinians, arresting them for pro-Palestinian activism.”

Most Hebrew-language media outlets that reported on the story chose a variation on the first headline. In my eyes, however, the second headline is far more accurate for a number of reasons.

Firstly, I have no idea how Balad’s election fundraising campaign functioned, whether in 2013 or in general. As a supporter of the party, I want to believe that nothing illegal was done. However, what I do know for a fact is that there is hardly a single party in Israel that was not been suspected or convicted of violating Israel’s campaign finance law. I am also sure that the members of these parties were not arrested in the middle of the night, as if in a top-secret commando operation. Not even when suspicions were far greater and more severe — not even when the suspects were high-level officials. This isn’t the “language” in which Israel functions in the political-civil sphere. In Israel, night raids and arrests are a “natural” response to security threats.

It’s no coincidence, of course: the State of Israel has for years attempted to remove Balad from the political arena and turn the party into a security threat. Lacking the desire or even the ability to deal with the kind of discourse Balad promotes — perhaps the only party that has consistently presented a detailed vision for a real democratic future for this country — Israel prefers to turn it into a threat.

Think about how many times the words “terrorists,” “traitors,” or “spies” come up in the context of Balad. Not just from talkbackers on the Internet, but from ministers and MKs in the Knesset plenum. The sentiment behind every single attempt to delegitimize the party, from the repeated attempt to have the Knesset Ethics Committee ban its members from running in the elections to their suspension for meeting with families of Palestinian attackers, is one: Balad is not a legitimate political voice, but rather a threat to the very existence of the state.

MK Haneen Zoabi addresses the Central Elections Committee during a hearing over her disqualification from Knesset elections, February 12, 2015. (Screenshot)

MK Haneen Zoabi addresses the Central Elections Committee during a hearing over her disqualification from Knesset elections, February 12, 2015. (Screenshot)

Even hints about the source of the money — “cash that came in suitcases from Qatar” — were intended to raise the national anxiety levels. “Arab money,” as opposed to, say, money that comes from evangelists with anti-Semitic tendencies, is code word for “shady deals that endanger the state.” Thus it does not take much for this to turn into a military-style operation, reminiscent of the kind of things that occur regularly in the occupied territories.

One must wonder, then, why the state would want to define a political party as a threat while stripping it of its legitimacy rather than accepting it, if only to maintain a facade of democracy. It seems that beyond the banal response, “because it can,” which reflects the Right’s absolutist hold on power, which allows it to “remove its gloves,” there are two additional explanations:

Israel simply does not have the tools to deal with a non-violent national-civil struggle by Israel’s Palestinian citizens. Therefore it prefers to mark them as struggles that threaten state security and escalate them. When the state deems nonviolent actions, such as the Gaza flotillas or the BDS movement, as terrorism that subvert the state’s existence, it moves them from the civil sphere into one in where it writes all the rules: the security sphere.

Defining Balad as a security threat exempts Israel from the need to deal with the party’s legitimate national and civil demands. In this way, Sunday’s arrests achieved their goals, even if they are only making a mountain out of a molehill.

The second point is that Balad is the group most actively opposed to the deal Israel seeks to “sell” its Palestinian citizens: benefits afforded to citizens in exchange for erasing their national identity. Want culture? We’re happy to provide it. Culture Minister Miri Regev will promise to double the budget for Arab culture, as long as its representatives pledge allegiance to the flag. But should an Arab theater put on a play about Palestinian national identity, it could be subject to closure.

Israeli police carry away documents and computers from offices of the Northern Branch of the Islamic Movement, November 17, 2015. (Photo by Israel Police Spokesperson)

Israeli police carry away documents and computers from offices of the Northern Branch of the Islamic Movement, November 17, 2015. (Photo by Israel Police Spokesperson)

As long as its relationship is based on this “deal,” the state is willing to act with largesse, such as the case of the plan to transfer billions of shekels over to Arab authorities in order to minimize the discrimination against Israel’s Arab public. But what happens when some of the representatives of this public are unwilling to minimize their demand vis-a-vis this deal, and demand the right to influence the definition of the state itself so that it expresses their national identity as well? That’s when they turn from political opponents into a real threat, and must be dealt with as necessary.

A little under a year ago, the state outlawed the northern branch of the Islamic Movement, the largest Arab movement in the country. This measure was preceded by several calculated steps that turned the movement into a “security threat” and made it possible to convince the public that it needs to be outlawed. This included raiding the movement’s offices, arresting its officials, and more. The draconian decision passed without even the slightest opposition. All that was needed were the magic words: “security threat.”

If there is good reason to suspect Balad of fraud, then the issue must be investigated and those responsible must be held accountable. But years of harassment and persecution show that this goes way beyond issues of money handling. Step by step, Israel is turning Balad into a veritable security threat, ready for the final act in which it expels the party from the political arena. The outlawing of the Islamic Movement was proof that this is possible, at almost all costs.

This article was first published in Hebrew on Local Call. Read it here.

Newsletter banner

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article
  • LEAVE A COMMENT

    * Required

    COMMENTS

    1. i_like_ike52

      The bottom line is that it is the Israeli public that will make the decision whether to conduct a withdrawal from the West Bank which will enable the establishment of an independent Palestinian state. The Arab party, particularly Balad and Zoabi go out of their way to say that the Arabs will never, ever agree to make peace with Israel under any conditions, so one can credit them with the ongoing situation that the Palestinians prefer continuation of the “occupation” to obtaining an independent state. They make it clear that an independent state without unrestricted “right of return” of the Palestinian refugees is completely unacceptable. Thus, I repeat Balad and Zoabi work overtime to allow continuation of the occupation. I give them credit for telling what they truly believe, that the oppose peace. So be it.

      Reply to Comment
    2. Bruce Gould

      I_Like_Ike: You’ve won! Netanyahu has won, Israel has won. In this interview with Tom Friedman on Israeli TV, Friedman points out that Israel owns it all – all of Eretz Israel is under the control of the IDF, the settlements have gone too far to be reversed, the settlers won’t leave. So we’ve got a de facto one state with two equally large ethnic groups. All 6-6.5 million Palestinians are under Jewish control. The water, the land, the air, it’s all one state. You win!

      http://news.nana10.co.il/Article/?ArticleID=1209813&sid=126

      Reply to Comment
    3. Ben

      Ike you have a difficult relationship with the truth. Balad supports a binational state of all its citizens, and supports the two state solution based on ’67 lines and its position on the RoR is that Resolution 194 be implemented. You and I know that in any workable two state final status arrangement the language of 194 will allow for creative solutions satisfactory to both sides. Balad is not keeping Israel from making peace. Israel is keeping Israel from making peace. Balad and Zoabi are not working to sustain the occupation. You invert the truth. Hanin Zoabi is not forcing you to occupy Ariel or East Jerusalem and I think you do know that but you will never admit it. No reply needed. Thanks.

      Reply to Comment
      • AJew

        Ike is the one who is telling the truth. What Zoabi is asking for is a two stage NOT a two state solution.

        Stage 1: Let’s have two states. Israel should have both Arabs and Jews and it should accommodate the return of the descendants of refugees.

        Let’s also have an Arab state, called Palestine, in which no Jews are allowed to live.

        Stage 2: The Arabs of Israel whose numbers would be inflated with the return of the “refugees”, together with the help of the new Arab state and their allies world wide, would overthrow the Jews and expel large numbers of them, thereby realising their age old dream of implementing yet another Arab Muslim country in the Middle East and getting rid of the only Jewish state in the world.

        Hey, it isn’t a secret. They have been voicing such sentiments since the beginning of the last century. They have been saying that the Jews of Israel are foreign colonisers.

        Reply to Comment
        • Ben

          AJew, everything you write is like the first slide of a Peace Now presentation where the narrator displays a typical hackneyed settler talking point and then proceeds to dismantle it step by step:

          “We’ve all heard the arguments of the religious and political right-wing on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Filled with finalities and absolutes, they categorically rule out options, deny possibilities, and imply that believing otherwise is naive, foolish, and irresponsible. They argue that pro-Israel can mean only one thing: endorsing their hard-line views….”
          http://peacenow.org/page.php?id=103#.V-NSOTRHanM

          Reply to Comment
          • AJew

            No point in arguing with Ben. He is a fanatic hater of Israel and Jews.

            Reply to Comment
          • Ben

            Pure anti-Semitizing ad hominem slander, AJew. You’ve got nothing else. You stand revealed.

            Reply to Comment
          • AJew

            “ad hominem slander”

            He continually slanders an entire people and a religion but he complains about being slandered. You got to hand it to Ben, he has Hutzpa.

            Reply to Comment
    4. Average American

      There was no wide-spread investigation of the Shas party and arrests of its members when Ariyeh Deri was convicted and jailed (not just suspected) for taking bribes while Minister of the Interior. Why the difference of treatment of Shas and Balad?

      Reply to Comment